Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DMITRIY ROZHIN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 4265/06

  However, even in the absence of these, where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for or diminishing his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III, with further references).
• EGMR, 26.07.2005 - 73316/01

  SILIADIN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 4265/06

  In this regard, the question whether an applicant can claim to be the victim of the violation alleged is relevant at all stages of the proceedings under the Convention (see, among other numerous authorities, Siliadin v. France, no. 73316/01, § 61, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 4265/06

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 4265/06

  However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

  VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  43710/07, 6023/08, 11248/08, 27668/08, 31242/08 and 52133/08, § 138, 17 January 2012; and Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia, no. 4265/06, § 53, 23 October 2012), freedom of movement afforded to inmates and unobstructed access to natural light and air (see, for example, Shkurenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 15010/04, 10 September 2009), and relative lengthy daily periods for outdoor exercises and freedom of movement within the prison building (see Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no. 22635/03, §§ 48-52, 16 July 2009).
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 4963/06

  KURUSHIN v. RUSSIA

  The applicant's stay in both facilities was relatively short and the Court recently found no violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the brevity of the applicants" stay in the cramped conditions (see Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia, no. 4265/06, § 52, 23 October 2012, eleven days in a disciplinary cell with less than two square meters of personal space; and Fetisov and Others v. Russia, nos. 43710/07, 6023/08, 11248/08, 27668/08, 31242/08 and 52133/08, § 138, 17 January 2012, nineteen days in a cell with two square meters of personal space).
• EGMR - 34646/06

  ZHAKIYANOV v. RUSSIA

  Was there a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the belated correction of the prison regime (see Somogyi v. Hungary, no. 5770/05, §§ 22-28, 11 January 2011, and Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia, no. 4265/06, § 61, 23 October 2012)?.