Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 with regard to body search No violation of Art. 3 with regard to other complaints Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 34 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VALASINAS c. LITUANIE
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 3 en ce qui concerne la fouille à corps Non-violation de l'art. 3 quant aux autres griefs Violation de l'art. 8 Non-violation de l'art. 34 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 44558/98
- EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
Wird zitiert von ... (233) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
La prohibition de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants est absolue, quels que soient les circonstances et les agissements de la victime (Labita c. Italie [GC], no 26772/95, § 119, CEDH 2000-IV). - EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94
TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
Etant donné qu'il ne lui a été soumis aucune pièce de nature à réfuter les affirmations du requérant, mais que certains éléments ont au contraire confirmé les griefs de celui-ci (voir, mutatis mutandis, Timurtas c. Turquie, no 23531/94, § 45, CEDH 2000-VI), la Cour conclut que la fouille a été effectuée de la manière décrite par le requérant. - EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
En outre, en recherchant si un traitement est « dégradant'au sens de l'article 3, 1a Cour examinera si le but était d'humilier et de rabaisser l'intéressé et si, considérée dans ses effets, la mesure a ou non atteint la personnalité de celui-ci de manière incompatible avec l'article 3. Même l'absence d'un tel but ne saurait exclure de façon définitive un constat de violation de l'article 3 (Peers c. Grèce, no 28524/95, §§ 67, 68 et 74, CEDH 2001-III).
- EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
Where treatment humiliates or debases an individual showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see amongst recent authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, (Sect. 3), ECHR 2001-VIII, §§ 24-30, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, (Sect. 3), ECHR 2001-VIII, § 117). - EGMR, 20.10.2016 - 7334/13
MURSIC c. CROATIE
The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him or her to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his or her health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Idalov, cited above, § 93; Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 116; Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, § 178, ECHR 2016; and also, Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 141). - EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05
N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
Where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see amongst recent authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, §§ 24-30, ECHR 2001-VII, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII).
- EGMR, 28.09.2015 - 23380/09
BOUYID v. BELGIUM
Many subsequent judgments have highlighted the close link between the concepts of "degrading treatment" and respect for "dignity" (see, for example, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001-VIII; Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, § 114, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts); and Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 138). - EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 6780/18
ROTH v. GERMANY
In considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of such a purpose does not conclusively rule out a finding of a violation (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67, 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III; and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV c. BULGARIE
The Court observes that although the applicant shared a room measuring 16 square metres with four other residents, he enjoyed considerable freedom of movement both inside and outside the home, a fact likely to lessen the adverse effects of a limited sleeping area (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 103, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 5418/15
Bootsunglück vor Farmakonisi: Griechenland muss Flüchtlinge entschädigen
Des conditions générales de détention - dans lesquelles s'inscrivent les modalités des fouilles imposées au détenu - peuvent s'analyser en un traitement contraire à l'article 3 de la Convention, tout comme une fouille corporelle isolée (idem, § 36, Valasinas c. Lituanie, no 44558/98, CEDH 2001-VIII, Iwanczuk c. Pologne, no 25196/94, 15 novembre 2001, Yankov c. Bulgarie, no 39084/97, § 110, CEDH 2003-XII (extraits), et Lyalyakin c. Russie, no 31305/09, §§ 75, 12 mars 2015). - EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 70204/01
Erniedrigende Leibesvisitation eines Gefangenen
Des conditions générales de détention - dans lesquelles s'inscrivent les modalités des fouilles imposées aux détenus - peuvent s'analyser en un traitement contraire à l'article 3 (voir, par exemple, les arrêts Van der Ven et Lorsé précités, §§ 49 et 61 respectivement), tout comme une fouille corporelle isolée (voir les arrêts Valasinas c. Lituanie, du 24 juillet 2001, no 44558/98, CEDH 2001-VIII, et Iwanczuk c. Pologne, du 15 novembre 2001, no 25196/94 ; voir aussi l'arrêt Yankov c. Bulgarie, du 11 décembre 2003, § 110). - EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 20877/04
TESTA v. CROATIA
Although the purpose of such treatment is a factor to be taken into account, in particular the question of whether it was intended to humiliate or debase the victim, the absence of any such purpose does not inevitably lead to a finding that there has been no violation of Article 3 (Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 06.06.2002 - 53254/99
KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
The relevant domestic provisions regarding the applicant's complaints have been summarised in the Valasinas v. Lithuania (no. 44558/98, 24.7.2001, §§ 92-97, ECHR 2001-VIII) and Puzinas v. Lithuania (no. 44800/98, 14.3.2002, § 15-17) judgments.The Court recalls that there is no obligation under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention to have recourse to remedies which are inadequate (see, Valasinas v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 44558/98, 14.3.2000).
While the detention conditions there, namely the absence of windows and a stroll yard, were established as unsatisfactory by the Ombudsman, the Court considers that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the impugned treatment in that prison attained the minimum level of severity required for it to fall within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention, given in particular the very short duration of that period of detention and the absence of a medical document or other evidence showing a suffering or damage to the health of the applicant as a result of his keeping at the Kaunas Central Police Department Remand Prison (see, mutatis mutandis, Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, 24.7.2001, §§ 100-113, ECHR-VIII 2001).
- EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 4672/02
FARBTUHS c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 2293/03
WIESER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 45603/05
BUDINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 14612/02
WIKTORKO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 50901/99
VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 34393/03
PITALEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 70719/10
ZAMFIRACHI v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 72126/14
CEESAY v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
IACOV STANCIU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 18660/03
MALENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 30628/02
UKHAN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39084/97
YANKOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 47229/12
S.J. c. LUXEMBOURG (N° 2)
- EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00
JANKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 19090/20
FENECH v. MALTA
- EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 49169/09
STELLA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 22635/03
SULEJMANOVIC c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 36898/03
TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 62208/00
LABZOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 53254/99
KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 79857/12
MIHAI LAURENTIU MARIN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17885/04
ORCHOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5774/10
MANDIC AND JOVIC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97
POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 52750/99
LORSE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17599/05
NORBERT SIKORSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 35581/06
POKHLEBIN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 12350/04
WAINWRIGHT c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 23.01.2002 - 48321/99
SLIVENKO ET AUTRES contre la LETTONIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 23226/16
NIKITIN AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 17249/12
SZAFRANSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 41513/12
TSOKAS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 19866/04
ÜRFI ÇETINKAYA c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.09.2010 - 1033/07
XIROS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 73786/01
CENBAUER v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 10511/10
MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 16563/08
JULIN v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 30779/05
MELNITIS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 2889/09
TAGGATIDIS ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 35555/03
CIUPERCESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 15766/03
Oršuš u.a. ./. Kroatien
- EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01
Isolationshaft (Einzelhaft; Kontaktsperre; konkrete Begründung und …
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41220/98
ALIEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 37522/16
VUKUSIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 26746/05
SHISHKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 32133/11
KUMMER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 17892/03
SAVICS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 18280/04
SHISHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 14248/05
TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA (NO. 2)
- EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 1704/06
RAMISHVILI AND KOKHREIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49529/12
SYRIANOS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 25820/07
STEFAN STANKOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 72710/11
YARASHONEN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 64930/09
CIUPERCESCU c. ROUMANIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 23284/04
BORIS POPOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 6813/12
GEORGIOU ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 03.12.2015 - 74820/10
YAROSHOVETS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 24630/10
LINDSTRÖM AND MÄSSELI v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 16133/08
INSANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 15894/09
TZAMALIS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 61365/16
S.E.v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13
ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 36513/12
ENASOAIE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 28825/02
BUGLOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 11463/09
SAMARAS ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 43707/07
KOKTYSH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 41216/13
PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
- EGMR, 27.04.2017 - 34015/07
ZHERDEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 47180/10
REXHEPI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 10662/06
ENACHE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 16870/03
VIKULOV AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5903/10
STRUCL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 34704/08
NISIOTIS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 1555/04
ZAKHARKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04
ONOUFRIOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 10.09.2009 - 15010/04
SHKURENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 72277/01
DVOYNYKH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 11.03.2004 - 42346/98
G.B. v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 39042/97
KUZNETSOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.05.2023 - 13329/21
MITT v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 47603/10
TIREAN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 46546/12
MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 2585/06
DANILOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 33003/11
NECULA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 24402/07
VASYLCHUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 14337/04
RADU POP v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08
JIRSÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 13099/04
LAUTARU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
KHARCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 71572/01
BAZJAKS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 32362/02
VISLOGUZOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 58939/00
KOUZMIN c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 24325/03
GENERALOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 36932/02
BAKHMUTSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 29736/06
DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 22/03
GRIGORYEVSKIKH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 42239/02
STAROKADOMSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 39780/06
KOTSAFTIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 22625/02
MIRONOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 29660/03
STITIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 30323/02
PANDJIKIDZE ET SIX AUTRES c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 57325/00
D.H. ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 16.10.2003 - 55723/00
FADEYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 23968/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 60906/16
NOWAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5471/14
AMARIKYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 9635/13
DEJNEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06
KULYK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 42526/07
G. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 35049/08
SERCE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 31305/09
Russland wegen Erniedrigung eines Rekruten verurteilt
- EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 47775/10
TOMOIAGA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 75985/12
BAHNA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 40514/06
RUDYAK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1574/13
JAEGER v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07
BUTIUC AND DUMITROF v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 30595/09
ALI v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 11871/05
HADADE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 11677/11
NIECIECKI c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49268/10
LONGIN v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 14807/08
MIKHAIL GRISHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 18364/06
GRZYWACZEWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 30671/04
KLISHYN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 31725/04
BADILA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 1066/05
DOROGAYKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 60333/00
SLYUSAREV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 11932/02
MIKHAYLYUK AND PETROV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 4313/04
GORGUILADZE c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08
ALEKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 36941/02
GUBKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19312/06
VERGELSKYY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02
DENISENKO AND BOGDANCHIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 68337/01
BUZYCHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 30997/02
POLUFAKIN AND CHERNYSHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 63955/00
SUKHOVOY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 37810/03
BAGEL v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 76114/01
SOLOVYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 63767/00
PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 27695/03
SERIFIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 16944/03
MIKOLENKO v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2005 - 16308/02
PECHEUR c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 01.06.2004 - 45027/98
NARINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 11.03.2004 - 40653/98
IORGOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 34221/96
D.P. v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41707/98
KHOKHLICH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.04.2003 - 32458/96
SADAY contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 59460/12
PAWELKOWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 14344/13
ALIMOV v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 52160/13
MOXAMED ISMAACIIL AND ABDIRAHMAN WARSAME v. MALTA
- EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 36059/12
BORDENCIU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10
COSTEL GACIU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 51012/11
VALERIAN DRAGOMIR v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 5747/10
JEVSNIK v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 15853/08
VOLOSHYN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 29343/10
EPISTATU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 19730/10
TOMA BARBU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 1777/06
GEANOPOL v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 19619/03
PETRIKS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 5711/10
LALIC AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 20641/04
CHUDUN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.04.2010 - 32940/08
TEHRANI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 37463/04
AKHMETOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 48497/06
DERMANOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 28.01.2010 - 8258/06
BRAGIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 522/04
ALIEV c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 18.11.2008 - 871/02
SAVENKOVAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 3522/04
SALMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 75520/01
KOZINETS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 11801/04
TSALKITZIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 879/02
DEVRIM TURAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 20841/02
DROZDOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 68909/01
KARAKAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 30138/02
NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 39483/98
NAZARENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 38654/97
GORAL v. POLAND
- EGMR - 13383/22 (anhängig)
ÇAY c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR - 9912/23 (anhängig)
KÖSTEK c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR - 33045/19 (anhängig)
ÜRE c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 6739/11
BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 24129/11
O.R. AND L.R. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 257/14
BARBU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2017 - 34515/04
KULIK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 18616/13
TODIREASA v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 13406/06
OSAKOVSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 41358/10
TUROSINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 27359/05
BORTKEVICH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 37298/05
ARAZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 22680/09
TUNCER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 17187/05
RADUCANU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 5203/09
KONDRATYEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 21978/07
JANKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 5767/10
MESIC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 9643/03
GOH v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 22605/03
CZECHOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04
STASZEWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 39364/05
KHIDER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 41653/05
KOCHETKOV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 3027/03
SLADKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 67086/01
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 52697/99
MIKADZÉ c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 10507/03
DOROCHENKO v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 64812/01
ALVER v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 63821/16
WIERZBICKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12
ORLOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 47183/13
RAKUZOVS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 20806/10
CHMIL v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 43543/09
CONSTANTIN TUDOR v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 37538/05
ZNAYKIN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 16437/04
KOBETS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 25948/05
KNYAZEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 19735/02
ATICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 40225/02
SOTIROPOULOU c. GRECE
- EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 34096/02
ZIVULINSKAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 63767/00
PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 53157/99
LEDYAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 44800/98
PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 43008/16
MARCINIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 5358/14
X AND Y v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 7262/06
DANILIUC v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 6682/10
FERENC v. SLOVENIA
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 44558/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2, Art. 10, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 44558/98
- EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 44558/98
The Government recall the Court's case-law (the Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26) whereby it has been established that treatment contrary to Article 3 must include the.