Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 45563/04 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Wolters Kluwer
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ASSOCIAZIONE NAZIONALE REDUCI AND 275 OTHERS v. GERMANY
Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
Papierfundstellen
- NJW 2009, 492
Wird zitiert von ... (21) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 22860/02
WOS c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 45563/04
Insbesondere bei der Entscheidung, wie und an wen Wiedergutmachung für solches Unrecht zu leisten ist, hat der Staat einen großen Ermessensspielraum (…siehe sinngemäß von Maltzan u.a. ./. Deutschland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerden Nr. 71916/01, 71917/01 und 10260/02, Rdnr. 74, ECHR 2005-...; Wos ./. Polen , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 22860/02, Rdnr. 72, ECHR 2006-...).In dieser Rechtssache befand der Gerichtshof, dass der Beschwerdeführer die Voraussetzungen erfüllte und daher zumindest einen vertretbaren Anspruch auf Entschädigung hatte (siehe Wos ./. Polen [Entsch.], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 22860/02, 1. März 2005, am 8. Juni 2006 durch Urteil des Gerichtshofs bestätigt, a.a.O.).
- EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98
Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 45563/04
Obgleich die Anwendung von Artikel 14 eine Verletzung dieser Bestimmungen nicht voraussetzt und er insoweit autonom ist, kann es Raum für seine Anwendung nur geben, wenn der in Frage stehende Sachverhalt unter eine oder mehrere dieser Bestimmungen fällt (siehe Hans-Adam von Liechtenstein ./. Deutschland [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 42527/98, Rdnr. 91, ECHR 2001-VIII). - BVerfG, 21.10.1987 - 2 BvR 373/83
Teso
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 45563/04
Dies gilt auch für die rechtliche Situation der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, die als Rechtsnachfolgerin des Deutschen Reiches gilt (siehe die Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts 2 BvF 1/73, Urteil vom 31. Juli 1973, Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (BVerfGE), Band 36, S. 1 ff, 15-16, und 2 BvR 373/83, Entscheidung vom 21. Oktober 1987, Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (BVerfGE), Band 77, S. 137 ff, 154-156). - EGMR, 02.03.2005 - 71916/01
Entschädigungs- und Ausgleichsleistungsgesetzes über die Wiedergutmachung von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 45563/04
Insbesondere bei der Entscheidung, wie und an wen Wiedergutmachung für solches Unrecht zu leisten ist, hat der Staat einen großen Ermessensspielraum (siehe sinngemäß von Maltzan u.a. ./. Deutschland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerden Nr. 71916/01, 71917/01 und 10260/02, Rdnr. 74, ECHR 2005-...;… Wos ./. Polen , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 22860/02, Rdnr. 72, ECHR 2006-...). - BVerfG, 31.07.1973 - 2 BvF 1/73
Grundlagenvertrag
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 45563/04
Dies gilt auch für die rechtliche Situation der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, die als Rechtsnachfolgerin des Deutschen Reiches gilt (siehe die Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts 2 BvF 1/73, Urteil vom 31. Juli 1973, Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (BVerfGE), Band 36, S. 1 ff, 15-16, und 2 BvR 373/83, Entscheidung vom 21. Oktober 1987, Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (BVerfGE), Band 77, S. 137 ff, 154-156).
- EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00
Andrejeva ./. Lettland
Moreover, it was Latvia that was a victim of the Soviet aggression and the Court has normally drawn a distinction between States or regimes which have caused suffering and States which of their own good will, free from any obligation, have decided to compensate, at least partly, for the damage caused (see, mutatis mutandis, Associazione Nazionale Reduci dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007, in which Germany was not attributed responsibility for the damage caused by the German Reich, and Wos v. Poland (dec.), no. 22860/02, ECHR 2005-IV, in which partial compensation for slave labour during the Second World War did not create an additional obligation on Poland). - EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 31438/06
KADLUCZKA v. POLAND
This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007; and Ernewein and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 14849/08, 2 May 2009) but it is even more relevant for third States, like Poland, who bear no responsibility in connection with wrongs inflicted by a foreign occupying force or another State (see, mutatis mutandis, Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 124, ECHR 2004-V; Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos.For details, see the decision in the case Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany, no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007.
- EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 36137/04
KROSTA v. POLAND
This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007; and Ernewein and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 14849/08, 2 May 2009) but it is even more relevant for third States, like Poland, who bear no responsibility in connection with wrongs inflicted by a foreign occupying force or another State (see, mutatis mutandis, Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 124, ECHR 2004-V; Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos.[3] For details, see the decision in the case Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany, no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007.
- EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 24120/06
Weigerung deutscher Gerichte, Nachkommen der Opfer von Waffen-SS-Massaker in …
Der Gerichtshof erinnert daran, dass die Konvention den Vertragsstaaten keine spezifische Pflicht auferlegt, Unrecht oder Schäden, die von ihrem Vorgängerstaat verursacht wurden, wieder gut zu machen (Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione und 275 weitere ./. Deutschland (Entsch.), Nr. 45563/04, 4. September 2007, und E. und andere ./. Deutschland (Entsch.), Nr. 14849/08, CEDH 2009-...). - EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 16778/02
JAKOWICZ v. POLAND
This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007; and Ernewein and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 14849/08, 2 May 2009) but it is even more relevant for third States, like Poland, who bear no responsibility in connection with wrongs inflicted by a foreign occupying force or another State (see, mutatis mutandis, Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 124, ECHR 2004-V; Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos.[5] For details, see the decision in the case Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany, no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007.
- EGMR, 03.09.2015 - 22588/08
SÕRO v. ESTONIA
But the Convention does not impose a specific obligation on the Contracting States to provide redress for wrongs or damage caused under the general cover of State authority prior to their ratification of the Convention (see Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 38, ECHR 2004-IX; Wos v. Poland (dec.), no. 22860/02, § 80, ECHR 2005-IV; Wos v. Poland, no. 22860/02, § 72, ECHR 2006-VII; Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007; Epstein and Others v. Belgium (dec.), no. 9717/05, ECHR 2008-... (extracts); and Preussische Treuhand GmbH & Co. Kg a. A. v. Poland (dec.), no. 47550/06, § 64, ECHR 2008-... (extracts)). - EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 29334/06
KOSTKA v. POLAND
This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007; and Ernewein and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 14849/08, 2 May 2009) but it is even more relevant for third States, like Poland, who bear no responsibility in connection with wrongs inflicted by a foreign occupying force or another State (see, mutatis mutandis, Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 124, ECHR 2004-V; Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. - EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 14849/08
E. u. a. ./. Deutschland
- EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 41285/02
SZAL v. POLAND
This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007; and Ernewein and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 14849/08, 2 May 2009) but it is even more relevant for third States, like Poland, who bear no responsibility in connection with wrongs inflicted by a foreign occupying force or another State (see, mutatis mutandis, Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 124, ECHR 2004-V; Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. - EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 20870/04
BELKA v. POLAND
This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e dalla Guerra di Liberazione (A.N.R.P.) v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007; and Ernewein and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 14849/08, 2 May 2009) but it is even more relevant for third States, like Poland, who bear no responsibility in connection with wrongs inflicted by a foreign occupying force or another State (see, mutatis mutandis, Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 124, ECHR 2004-V; Von Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. - EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 25168/05
CZEKIEN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 9717/05
EPSTEIN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 39162/12
RUIZ-FUNES MONTESINOS ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 06.01.2011 - 14336/05
KAMBUROV v. BULGARIA (II)
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 41367/02
ZGOLA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39590/04
SOKOLOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 47267/16
ARBIB c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14
DA CUNHA FOLHADELA MOREIRA v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 50166/08
CORBLET DE FALLERANS c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 38180/02
PACIEJ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 30745/03
PIRKMAJER v. SLOVENIA