Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 45959/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (5)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITROV v. \
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITROV v. \
[MAC] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITROV v. \
[ALB] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITROV v. \
[MAC] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITROV v. \
[SLV] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MITROV v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 45959/09
- EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 45959/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 28169/08
VASILKOSKI AND OTHERS v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 45959/09
There is nothing to indicate that if the applicant had lodged such requests in respect of the investigating judge, Judge V.D. or the lay judges, the president of the court would have decided otherwise (see, mutatis mutandis, Vasilkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 28169/08, § 46, 28 October 2010). - EGMR, 15.06.2000 - 25723/94
ERDOGDU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 45959/09
As to whether it was possible to make a similar representation to other competent bodies, the Court notes that this remedy is not directly accessible to the accused (see, mutatis mutandis, Erdogdu v. Turkey, no. 25723/94, § 34, ECHR 2000-VI). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 45959/09
However, having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its finding of a violation of the applicant's right to a hearing by an impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 42095/98
DAKTARAS c. LITUANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 45959/09
In this connection, the Court reiterates that the objective test mostly concerns hierarchical or other links between the judge and other protagonists in the proceedings (see Morice, cited above; Fazli Aslaner v. Turkey, no. 36073/04, § 41, 4 March 2014; Hirschhorn v. Romania, no. 29294/02 26 July 2007, §§ 74-78 and Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, § 36, ECHR 2000-X).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 45959/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITROV AGAINST \
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITROV CONTRE « L'EX-RÉPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACÉDOINE »
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 45959/09
- EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 45959/09
Wird zitiert von ...
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 21571/05
MINDADZE AND NEMSITSVERIDZE v. GEORGIA
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Articles 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaints (see, among many other authorities, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references, and also Mitrov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 45959/09, § 58, 2 June 2016 ).