Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 07.06.2001

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2002,21804
EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,21804)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.03.2002 - 46477/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,21804)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. März 2002 - 46477/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,21804)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,21804) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 2 quant aux circonstances entourant la mort du fils du requérant Violation de l'art. 2 quant à l'absence d'enquête effective Aucune question distincte au regard des art. 6 ou 8 Violation de l'art. 13 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 as regards circumstances of the applicant's son's death Violation of Art. 2 as regards the failure to provide an effective investigation No separate issue under Art. 6 or 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ...

  • Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte PDF

    (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (388)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    It is incumbent on the State to account for any injuries suffered in custody, which obligation is particularly stringent where that individual dies (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    The applicants' complaints in this regard are therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52; Kaya, cited above, pp. 330-31, § 107; and Yasa, cited above, p. 2442, § 113).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", also requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see, mutatis mutandis, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 49, § 161, and Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 324, § 86).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2439-40, §§ 102-04; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80, 87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV; Tanrıkulu, cited above, § 109; and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, §§ 106-07, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy providing a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, Salman, cited above, § 106; Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

    MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2439-40, §§ 102-04; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80, 87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV; Tanrıkulu, cited above, § 109; and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, §§ 106-07, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    They cannot leave it to the initiative of the next-of-kin either to lodge a formal complaint or to take responsibility for the conduct of any investigative procedures (see, for example, mutatis mutandis, Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

    GÜL v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy providing a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, Salman, cited above, § 106; Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).
  • EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95

    KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    Furthermore, in the case of a breach of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, which rank as the most fundamental provisions of the Convention, compensation for the non-pecuniary damage flowing from the breach should, in principle, be available as part of the range of redress (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 109, ECHR 2001-V, and Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

    HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
    1778-79, §§ 83-84, and the recent Northern Irish judgments, for example, Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 120, and Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 114, both of 4 May 2001.
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

    KELLY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

    Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 55721/07

    Britische Soldaten sollen Kriegsverbrechen begangen haben

    Le rôle joué par la hiérarchie militaire dans la notification à la section spéciale d'investigation d'un incident appelant une enquête et, ultérieurement, dans le renvoi devant l'Autorité de poursuite de l'armée des affaires examinées par ladite section, n'autoriserait pas à conclure que ces enquêtes ne présentaient pas l'indépendance requise par les articles 2 ou 3 (Cooper c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 48843/99, §§ 108-115, CEDH 2003-XII ; McKerr c. Royaume-Uni, no 28883/95, CEDH 2001-III, et Paul et Audrey Edwards c. Royaume-Uni, no 46477/99, CEDH 2002-II).
  • EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 48939/99

    ÖNERYILDIZ c. TURQUIE

    In this connection, the Court reiterates that Article 2 does not solely concern deaths resulting from the use of force by agents of the State but also, in the first sentence of its first paragraph, lays down a positive obligation on States to take appropriate steps to safeguard the lives of those within their jurisdiction (see, for example, L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, p. 1403, § 36, and Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 54, ECHR 2002-II).
  • EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 25965/04

    RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA

    The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.06.2001 - 46477/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,33360
EGMR, 07.06.2001 - 46477/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,33360)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.06.2001 - 46477/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,33360)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Juni 2001 - 46477/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,33360)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,33360) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht