Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 08.02.2001

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2002,23881
EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,23881)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.04.2002 - 46726/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,23881)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. April 2002 - 46726/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,23881)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,23881) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (41)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74

    SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1) (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99
    The Court reiterates that non-pecuniary damage is to be assessed with reference to the autonomous criteria it has derived from the Convention, not on the basis of the principles defined in the law or practice of the State concerned (see, mutatis mutandis, The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (Article 50), judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 38, p. 17, § 41, and Probstmeier v. Germany, judgment of 1 July 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1140, § 77).
  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99
    In that connection, the Court reiterates that the object and purpose of the Convention, which is an instrument for the protection of human beings, requires its provisions to be interpreted and applied in such a way as to make their stipulations not theoretical or illusory but practical and effective (see, for example, Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, pp. 15-16, § 33; United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 30 January 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 18-19, § 33; and Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 100, ECHR 1999-III).
  • EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

    MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99
    In their internal legal orders the Contracting States make the rights to vote and to stand for election subject to conditions which are not in principle precluded under Article 3. They have a wide margin of appreciation in this sphere, but it is for the Court to determine in the last resort whether the requirements of Protocol No. 1 have been complied with; it has to satisfy itself that the conditions do not curtail the rights in question to such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness; that they are imposed in pursuit of a legitimate aim; and that the means employed are not disproportionate (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, p. 23, § 52; Gitonas and Others v. Greece, judgment of 1 July 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, pp. 1233-34, § 39; Ahmed and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2384, § 75; and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 201, ECHR 2000-IV).
     
  • EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

    CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99
    In that connection, the Court reiterates that the object and purpose of the Convention, which is an instrument for the protection of human beings, requires its provisions to be interpreted and applied in such a way as to make their stipulations not theoretical or illusory but practical and effective (see, for example, Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, pp. 15-16, § 33; United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 30 January 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 18-19, § 33; and Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 100, ECHR 1999-III).
  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 26103/95

    VAN GEYSEGHEM c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99
    The Court considers, like the Government, that no causal link has been established between the alleged pecuniary loss and the violation found (see Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 40, ECHR 1999-I, and Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 73, ECHR 1999-II).
  • EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

    JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99
    The Court reiterates that, in order for costs to be included in an award under Article 41 of the Convention, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and reasonable as to quantum (see, among many other authorities, Nikolova, cited above, § 79, and Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 112, ECHR 2000-IX).
  • EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 24159/22

    GU?MUNDUR GUNNARSSON AND MAGN?S DAV?? NOR?DAHL v. ICELAND

    While the margin of appreciation in this area is wide, it is limited by the obligation to respect the fundamental principle of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, namely "the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature" (see Hirst, cited above, § 61; Tanase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7/08, § 157, ECHR 2010; Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt, cited above, § 54; and Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II).
  • EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 14305/17

    Menschenrechtsgerichtshof fordert Freilassung von Selahattin Demirtas

    There is room for "implied limitations", and the Contracting States have a wide margin of appreciation in this sphere (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt, cited above, § 52; Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II; Sadak and Others, cited above, § 31; and Kavakçi, cited above, § 40).
  • EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 74025/01

    HIRST c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 2)

    The Court reaffirms that the margin in this area is wide (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt, cited above, p. 23, § 52, and, more recently, Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 63, ECHR 1999-I; see also Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 201, ECHR 2000-IV, and Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.02.2001 - 46726/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,34430
EGMR, 08.02.2001 - 46726/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,34430)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.02.2001 - 46726/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,34430)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Februar 2001 - 46726/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,34430)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,34430) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

    MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2001 - 46726/99
    Lesdites conditions ne doivent toutefois pas réduire les droits électoraux au point de les atteindre dans leur substance même, elles doivent poursuivre un but légitime, et les moyens employés ne doivent pas se révéler disproportionnés (cf. arrêt Mathieu-Mohin et Clerfayt c. Belgique du 2 mars 1987, série A n° 113, p. 23, § 52).
  • EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

    PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2001 - 46726/99
    En particulier, un recours inapte à prospérer en temps utile n'est ni adéquat ni effectif (cf. arrêt Pine Valley Developments Ltd. et autres c. Irlande du 29 novembre 1991, série A n° 222, p. 25, § 47).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht