Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07, 50591/12 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TESIC v. SERBIA
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of petition) Pecuniary and non-pecuniary ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Tesic v. Serbia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
TESIC v. SERBIA
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07, 50591/12
- EGMR, 21.02.2018 - 4678/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91
TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07
Concerning the former she specifically referred to the disproportionate nature of the damages awarded, and cited the relevant Strasbourg case-law (such as, for example, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B; and Filipovic v. Serbia, no. 27935/05, 20 November 2007).The Court relies on Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom (13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B).
- EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85
Oberschlick ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07
Moreover, Article 10 protects not only the substance of the ideas and information expressed but also the form in which they are conveyed (see, for example, Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, § 57, Series A no. 204). - EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 46311/99
McVICAR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07
However, account must be taken of the distinction between factual statements on the one hand and value judgments on the other, since the existence of facts can be demonstrated whereas the truth of value judgments is not susceptible to proof (see, for example, Lingens v. Austria, judgment of 8 July 1986, § 46, Series A no. 103; and McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, § 83, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07
Concerning the length of the criminal proceedings prior to their reopening, the Court notes that the Convention had entered into force in respect of Serbia on 3 March 2004 and that by 19 July 2006 these proceedings had been terminated (see paragraph 9 above; see also Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 84, Series A no. 51). - EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93
BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07
The Court has repeatedly upheld the right to impart, in good faith, information on matters of public interest, even where this involved damaging statements about private individuals (see, mutatis mutandis, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.02.2018 - 4678/07, 50591/12 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TESIC CONTRE LA SERBIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TESIC AGAINST SERBIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07
- EGMR, 21.02.2018 - 4678/07, 50591/12
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 11/05
GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELIK v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2018 - 4678/07
11/05/2014. - VK Rheinland-Pfalz, 14.05.2002 - 11/02
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2018 - 4678/07
11/02/2014.