Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF ST PETERSBURG AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) read in the light of Article 11 - (Art. 11) Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Church of Scientology of St Petersburg and Others v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 38178/97

  SERIF c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  They maintained that the applicable standard should be the one that favours religious pluralism, even where there is religious tension and division within society (they referred to Serif v. Greece, no. 38178/97, § 53, ECHR 1999-IX, and Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 72881/01

  BRANCHE DE MOSCOU DE L'ARMEE DU SALUT c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  The Court observes that the grounds for refusing the registration of the applicant group were not consistent throughout the time the applicants were attempting to obtain registration (compare Church of Scientology Moscow, cited above, § 88, and Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, § 78, ECHR 2006-XI).
• EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02

  CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  The Court reiterates that, in the absence of a European consensus on the religious nature of Scientology teachings, and being mindful of the subsidiary nature of its role, it must rely on the position of the domestic authorities in the matter and determine the applicable Convention provision in the light of it (see Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 79, ECHR 2009, and Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147/02, § 64, 5 April 2007).

 
• EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 40825/98

  RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  The Austrian system gave rise to the Court's finding of a violation in Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria (no. 40825/98, § 79, 31 July 2008), the Latvian 1995 Law on Religious Associations did not contain any such requirements, and in Romania the waiting period is relevant only to attaining the status of a "religious denomination", a special form that enjoys certain public-law privileges including State subsidies.
• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01

  KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  The Court reiterates that, in the absence of a European consensus on the religious nature of Scientology teachings, and being mindful of the subsidiary nature of its role, it must rely on the position of the domestic authorities in the matter and determine the applicable Convention provision in the light of it (see Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 79, ECHR 2009, and Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147/02, § 64, 5 April 2007).
• EGMR, 20.09.1994 - 13470/87

  OTTO-PREMINGER-INSTITUT v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  The Government justified the interference as having been necessary in a democratic society for suppressing manifestations of religious discord (they referred to Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, and Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, 20 September 1994, § 50, Series A no. 295-A).
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  They maintained that the applicable standard should be the one that favours religious pluralism, even where there is religious tension and division within society (they referred to Serif v. Greece, no. 38178/97, § 53, ECHR 1999-IX, and Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A).

• EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08

  ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Thus, the status afforded to unregistered public associations significantly restricts the right to freedom of association of the founders and members of such an association (compare Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2009; Church of Scientology of St Petersburg and Others v. Russia, no. 47191/06, § 38, 2 October 2014; and Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow and Others, cited above, §§ 102 and 103, all concerning refusals to register religious organisations).
• EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 72874/01

  UNION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  70945/11, 23611/12, 26998/12, 41150/12, 41155/12, 41463/12, 41553/12, 54977/12 and 56581/12, § 45, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Church of Scientology of St Petersburg and Others v. Russia, no. 47191/06, § 32, 2 October 2014).