Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 6)
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 10 Violation de l'art. 6-1 (indépendance et impartialité du Tribunal de l'état-major) Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 6 (autre grief) Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédures nationale et de la ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERGIN v. TURKEY (No. 6)
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6-1 (independence and impartiality of the General Staff Court) Not necessary to examine Art. 6 (another complaint) Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention and domestic proceedings ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
- EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 47533/99
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23556/94
CEYLAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
The Court has previously dealt with cases which raised similar issues to those of the present case, and in which it found violations of Article 10 of the Convention (see, among other judgments, Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos. - EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93
ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
The Court has previously dealt with cases which raised similar issues to those of the present case, and in which it found violations of Article 10 of the Convention (see, among other judgments, Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos. - EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 29900/96
SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
However, it would point out that its task is limited to assessing the specific circumstances of the case; it does not consider that it can conclude that a case no longer has a valid legal interest for the applicant on the ground that there have been changes in domestic legislation since the material time (see Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 38, ECHR 2001-VIII).
- EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 38784/97
MORRIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
The Court reiterates that the Convention does not prohibit military courts from ruling on criminal charges against military personnel, provided that the guarantees of independence and impartiality enshrined in Article 6 § 1 are respected (see Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 38784/97, § 59, ECHR 2002-I; Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 106, ECHR 2003-XII; and Hakan Önen v. Turkey, (dec.), no. 32860/96, 10 February 2004). - EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 43928/98
KARKIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 27528/95
KIZILYAPRAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 48843/99
COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
The Court reiterates that the Convention does not prohibit military courts from ruling on criminal charges against military personnel, provided that the guarantees of independence and impartiality enshrined in Article 6 § 1 are respected (see Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 38784/97, § 59, ECHR 2002-I; Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 106, ECHR 2003-XII; and Hakan Önen v. Turkey, (dec.), no. 32860/96, 10 February 2004). - EKMR, 16.05.1977 - 7050/75
ARROWSMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
Moreover, the context in which the opinions were expressed can be distinguished, as regards their potential impact, from that of the Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom case, in which the applicant, a pacifist activist, had distributed a leaflet inciting servicemen to desert at a military camp occupied by troops who were shortly to be posted to Northern Ireland (see Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission's report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 19, p. 5).
- EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 40426/98
MARTIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
It is, however, a different matter where the national legislation empowers a military court to try civilians on criminal charges (Ergin v. Turkey (No. 6), no. 47533/99, § 41, 5 May 2006).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 47533/99, 37033/03, 56827/00, 4211/02, 65344/01, 70335/01, 2458/12 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERGIN CONTRE LA TURQUIE (N° 6) ET 6 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERGIN AGAINST TURKEY (No. 6) AND 6 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99
- EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 47533/99, 37033/03, 56827/00, 4211/02, 65344/01, 70335/01, 2458/12
Wird zitiert von ...
- EGMR, 28.11.2019 - 1230/17
MUSTAFA c. BULGARIE
D'autres éléments pertinents concernant la situation internationale dans le domaine du jugement des civils par des tribunaux militaires sont relatés dans les arrêts Maszni c. Roumanie (no 59892/00, §§ 27-33, 21 septembre 2006) et Ergin c. Turquie (no 6) (no 47533/99, §§ 20-25, CEDH 2006-VI (extraits)).Toutefois, il en va différemment lorsque la législation nationale habilite ce type de juridiction à juger des civils en matière pénale (Ergin c. Turquie (no 6), no 47533/99, § 41, CEDH 2006-VI (extraits), et Maszni c. Roumanie, no 59892/00, § 43, 21 septembre 2006 ; paragraphes 17-20 ci-dessus).