Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KACPRZYK v. POLAND

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 50020/06

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII, and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.

  In particular, the Court considered that the remedy was capable both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 36-42).

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 50020/06

  The Court recalls that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention were stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI; and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04

  BAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 50020/06

  Having regard to the foregoing and noting that the offences with which the applicant had been charged, even though they carried a severe penalty, were not violent crimes and that the case did not belong to the category of organised crime (compare Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)), the Court concludes that the grounds given by the domestic authorities could not justify the overall period of the applicant's detention.

• EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 1127/06

  HAJOL c. POLOGNE

  La Cour rappelle qu'il ressort de nombreuses décisions prononcées dans des affaires polonaises qu'aux fins de l'épuisement des voies de recours internes, un requérant n'est pas tenu de faire appel contre chaque ordonnance portant sur la prolongation de sa détention provisoire (voir, notamment Kacprzyk c. Pologne, no 50020/06, §§ 27-31, 21 juillet 2009, ou, a contrario, Bronk c. Pologne (déc.), no30848/03, 11 septembre 2007).