Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERKOL v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-2 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 50172/06
• EGMR, 04.09.2019 - 50172/06

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 56568/00

  Y c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 50172/06

  In Turkey, as is the case in a significant number of Contracting States (see Y v. Norway, no. 56568/00, § 41, ECHR 2003-II (extracts)), an acquittal or suspension of criminal proceedings does not preclude the establishment of civil liability in relation to the same facts.
• EKMR, 06.10.1982 - 9295/81

  X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 50172/06

  The Court has already held that while an acquittal in respect of criminal liability ought to be maintained in subsequent compensation proceedings, it should not preclude the establishment of civil liability to pay compensation arising out of the same facts on the basis of a less strict burden of proof (see, mutatis mutandis, X v. Austria, no. 9295/81, Commission decision of 6 October 1992, Decisions and Reports (D.R.) 30, p. 227, and M.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 11882/85, decision of 7 October 1987, D.R. 54, p. 162).
• EKMR, 07.10.1987 - 11882/85

  C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 50172/06

  The Court has already held that while an acquittal in respect of criminal liability ought to be maintained in subsequent compensation proceedings, it should not preclude the establishment of civil liability to pay compensation arising out of the same facts on the basis of a less strict burden of proof (see, mutatis mutandis, X v. Austria, no. 9295/81, Commission decision of 6 October 1992, Decisions and Reports (D.R.) 30, p. 227, and M.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 11882/85, decision of 7 October 1987, D.R. 54, p. 162).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 50172/06

  Further, there were no formal declarations of the applicant's guilt which could prejudge the assessment of the facts by the competent judicial authority (see in regard to prosecutors, Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, ECHR 2000-X; see, mutatis mutandis, Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, § 41, Series A no. 308).

• EGMR, 28.08.2012 - 4062/07

  FAZLI DIRI v. TURKEY

  In its judgment of 19 April 2011 the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 2 of the Convention on account of the language used by the Trabzon Labour Court (see Erkol v. Turkey, no. 50172/06, §§ 41-42, 19 April 2011).

  I could not follow the majority for the reasons explained in Erkol v Turkey, no. 50172/06, 19 April 2011.