Weitere Entscheidungen unten: EGMR, 27.02.2019 | EGMR, 04.09.2003

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,59706
EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,59706)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.09.2004 - 50222/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,59706)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. September 2004 - 50222/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,59706)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,59706) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA

    Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
    Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (53)

  • EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 22978/05

    Gäfgen - Folter bei polizeilicher Vernehmung; Kindesentführung; Geständnis trotz

    Weitere Faktoren sind u.a. der Zweck, zu dem die Behandlung erfolgte, die dahinterstehende Absicht oder die Beweggründe dafür (vgl. u.a. Aksoy ./. Türkei, 18. Dezember 1996,Rdnr. 64, Berichte 1996-VI; Egmez ./. Zypern, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 30873/96, Rdnr. 78, ECHR 2000-XII; und Krastanov ./. Bulgarien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 50222/99, Rdnr. 53, 30. September 2004), sowie der Kontext, in dem sie erfolgte, z.B. in einer sehr angespannten und emotional aufgeladenen Atmosphäre (vgl. z.B. Selmouni, a.a.O., Rdnr. 104 und Egmez, a.a.O.).
  • EGMR, 30.06.2008 - 22978/05

    Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren (Fortwirkung von Verstößen gegen die

    Die Befragung dauerte jedoch nur etwa 10 Minuten und, wie in dem Strafverfahren gegen die Polizeibeamten festgestellt wurde (siehe Rdnr. 46), fand sie in einer sehr angespannten und emotional aufgeladenen Atmosphäre statt, was darauf zurückzuführen war, dass die völlig erschöpften und unter hohem Druck stehenden Polizeibeamten glaubten, sie hätten nur ein paar Stunden, um J.s Leben zu retten; diese Merkmale können als strafmildernde Faktoren angesehen werden (vgl. Egmez , a.a.O., Rdnr. 78, und Krastanov ./. Bulgarien , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 50222/99, Rdnr. 53, 30. September 2004).
  • EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 17828/05

    OCHELKOV v. RUSSIA

    In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

    The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).

    The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).

  • EGMR, 24.07.2008 - 41461/02

    VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIA

    In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

    This is so because, if the authorities could confine their reaction to incidents of wilful ill-treatment by State agents to the mere payment of compensation, while not doing enough to prosecute and punish those responsible, it would be possible in some cases for agents of the State to abuse the rights of those within their control with virtual impunity, and the general legal prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment, despite its fundamental importance, would be ineffective in practice (see, among many other authorities, Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 60, 30 September 2004, and mutatis mutandis, Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74; Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV; Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000; Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001; Avsar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII).

  • EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 3933/04

    KOPYLOV v. RUSSIA

    Any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by the detainee's own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

    The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).

  • EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 37679/08

    BURES v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    Wilful ill-treatment of persons who are within the control of agents of the State cannot be remedied exclusively through an award of compensation to the victim (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 60, 30 September 2004, and Kopylov v. Russia, no. 3933/04, § 130, 29 July 2010).

    In respect of persons deprived of their liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by their own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

  • EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 20756/04

    ISAYEV v. RUSSIA

    In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

    The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).

  • EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 33470/03

    ANTIPENKOV v. RUSSIA

    In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

    The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).

  • EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 9297/02

    NADROSOV v. RUSSIA

    In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

    The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).

  • EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 28847/08

    GLADOVIC v. CROATIA

    In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

    The Court reiterates that in respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (Ribitsch, cited above, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

  • EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 43239/04

    RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 36220/02

    BARABANSHCHIKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 5742/02

    AKULININ AND BABICH v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09

    DURDEVIC v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 30033/05

    POLONSKIY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 19072/08

    HABIMI AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  • EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 32133/11

    KUMMER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  • EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 22663/06

    GRIGORYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 41833/04

    YEVGENIY ALEKSEYENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03

    GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 43233/02

    MAKSIMOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 14612/02

    WIKTORKO v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 64418/10

    MIHHAILOV v. ESTONIA

  • EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 20546/07

    MAKHASHEVY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20212/05

    ALCHAGIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 46793/06

    BULDASHEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 14146/02

    ARTYOMOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 15526/10

    V.D. v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 14030/03

    SHCHUKIN AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  • EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 22485/05

    FILATOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 38047/04

    SHUVALOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 10393/04

    NIKOLAY FEDOROV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02

    ELDAR IMANOV AND AZHDAR IMANOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 2807/04

    GLADYSHEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 34027/03

    DUR v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08

    BASENKO v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 34108/07

    SOHBY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 22867/05

    ABLYAZOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 3937/03

    KONDRATISHKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 1926/03

    STOJNSEK v. SLOVENIA

  • EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 1748/02

    BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 29766/03

    KARATEPE AND ULAS v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 14166/02

    ESER CEYLAN v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 77092/01

    NECDET BULUT v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 18293/03

    PELECKAS v. LITHUANIA

  • EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 36672/97

    KURNAZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 24129/11

    O.R. AND L.R. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 34140/07

    KIRINS v. LATVIA

  • EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 41250/02

    MIRCEA c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 17044/02

    ZHOVTAN v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 21533/07

    KRYAT v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04

    SHANIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 51083/09

    REILLY v. IRELAND

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02, 51284/09, 69138/01, 18059/05, 31365/02, 61275/00, 53121/99, 55061/00, 50222/99, 7888/03, 46317/99, 57883/00, 47905/99, 14383/03, 42027/98, 48130/99, 43531/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,4049
EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02, 51284/09, 69138/01, 18059/05, 31365/02, 61275/00, 53121/99, 55061/00, 50222/99, 7888/03, 46317/99, 57883/00, 47905/99, 14383/03, 42027/98, 48130/99, 43531/08 (https://dejure.org/2019,4049)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.02.2019 - 34805/02, 51284/09, 69138/01, 18059/05, 31365/02, 61275/00, 53121/99, 55061/00, 50222/99, 7888/03, 46317/99, 57883/00, 47905/99, 14383/03, 42027/98, 48130/99, 43531/08 (https://dejure.org/2019,4049)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. Februar 2019 - 34805/02, 51284/09, 69138/01, 18059/05, 31365/02, 61275/00, 53121/99, 55061/00, 50222/99, 7888/03, 46317/99, 57883/00, 47905/99, 14383/03, 42027/98, 48130/99, 43531/08 (https://dejure.org/2019,4049)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,4049) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ANGEL VASKOV ANGELOV CONTRE LA BULGARIE ET 16 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ANGEL VASKOV ANGELOV AGAINST BULGARIA AND 16 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 34805/02
  • EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02, 51284/09, 69138/01, 18059/05, 31365/02, 61275/00, 53121/99, 55061/00, 50222/99, 7888/03, 46317/99, 57883/00, 47905/99, 14383/03, 42027/98, 48130/99, 43531/08
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)

  • EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 39630/09

    El Masri klagt gegen Mazedonien

    Further factors include the purpose for which the treatment was inflicted together with the intention or motivation behind it (compare, inter alia, Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996-VI; Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XII; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31365/02

    GEORGI DIMITROV c. BULGARIE

    De même, dans le domaine des opérations programmées de la police, les autorités ont l'obligation de prendre des mesures appropriées de nature à minimiser les dommages pour toutes les personnes concernées (voir, mutatis mutandis, Rehbock c. Slovénie, no 29462/95, § 72, CEDH 2000-XII, ainsi que Rashid c. Bulgarie, no 47905/99, § 51, 18 janvier 2007).

    Les autorités avaient donc l'obligation de prendre les mesures nécessaires pour procéder à cette arrestation de façon à minimiser les dommages pour toutes les personnes concernées (Kurnaz et autres c. Turquie, no 36672/97, § 55, 24 juillet 2007, et Rashid c. Bulgarie, no 47905/99, § 51, 18 janvier 2007), ce qu'elles n'ont apparemment pas fait.

  • EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 29612/09

    MARTYNETS v. RUSSIA

    The term "final decision", which is a starting point of the six-month period, refers to the final decision resulting from the normal frame of exhaustion of domestic remedies in accordance with the generally recognised rules of international law (see De Becker v. Belgium, no. 214/56, Commission decision of 9 June 1958, Yearbook 2, p. 214 at p. 242, and Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 7888/03, 13 March 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 50222/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2003,49262
EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 50222/99 (https://dejure.org/2003,49262)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.09.2003 - 50222/99 (https://dejure.org/2003,49262)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. September 2003 - 50222/99 (https://dejure.org/2003,49262)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,49262) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht