Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 18.10.2001

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,25875
EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,25875)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.12.2004 - 50385/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,25875)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Dezember 2004 - 50385/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,25875)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,25875) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 30, Art. 36, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 2 en ce qui concerne le manque à protéger le droit à la vie Violation de l'art. 2 en ce qui concerne l'absence d'enquête effective Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MAKARATZIS v. GREECE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 30, Art. 36, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the failure to protect the right to life Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the lack of an effective investigation Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 2005, 3405
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (220)Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    This, however, does not exclude in principle an examination of the applicant's complaints under Article 2, the text of which, read as a whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 75, ECHR 2000-VII).

    The Court's case-law states at the same time that, in exceptional circumstances, physical ill-treatment by State agents that does not result in death may disclose a violation of Article 2 (see paragraphs 43-44 and 51-52 of the judgment; see also Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, 1 March 2001, and Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 76, ECHR 2000-VII).

    The Court has reiterated in Tekin v. Turkey, ([GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII) and Ä°lhan v. Turkey (judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV) that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity and that this assessment depends on all the circumstances of the case, namely the duration of the treatment, its physical or moral effects and the state of health of the victim.

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47).

    In these circumstances, while we welcome the improvements in the law governing the carrying and use of firearms by police officers which were introduced in Greece in July 2003 (see paragraph 27 of the judgment), we have not found it to be either necessary or appropriate to examine in the abstract the compatibility with Article 2 of the legislative provisions in force at the relevant time (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 47, § 153) or to base our conclusion on any deficiency in those provisions.

  • EGMR, 01.03.2001 - 22493/93

    BERKTAY c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The Institute acknowledged that the Court had already extended the applicability of Article 2 to cases where the applicant was not killed, but regretted the fact that it had limited the scope of its scrutiny to "only exceptional circumstances" (see Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, 1 March 2001).

    The Court's case-law states at the same time that, in exceptional circumstances, physical ill-treatment by State agents that does not result in death may disclose a violation of Article 2 (see paragraphs 43-44 and 51-52 of the judgment; see also Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, 1 March 2001, and Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 76, ECHR 2000-VII).

  • EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

    GÜL v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

    PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The circumstances in which deprivation of life may be justified must therefore be strictly construed (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

    Jens Söring

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The Court itself recognised that, in certain circumstances, a merely "potential" or "virtual" victim of a violation was entitled to take action under the Convention (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161).
  • EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

    KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    It observes that there was a judicial determination of the facts of the instant case at domestic level (see paragraph 19 above) and that no material has been adduced in the course of the Strasbourg proceedings which could call into question the findings of fact of the Athens First-Instance Criminal Court and lead the Court to depart from them (see Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, pp. 17-18, § 30).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
    The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 86, ECHR 1999-IV).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

    MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93

    KILIÇ v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98

    VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE

  • EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

    REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  • EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

    ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02

    BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court will begin by noting that although only one of the present applications, brought by Ms Budayeva, concerns the death of a family member, the circumstances of the case in respect of the other applicants leave no doubt as to the existence of a threat to their physical integrity (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 52-55, ECHR 2004-XI).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98

    NATCHOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

    In cases concerning the use of force by State agents, it must take into consideration not only the actions of the agents of the State who actually administered the force but also all the surrounding circumstances, including such matters as the relevant legal or regulatory framework in place and the planning and control of the actions under examination (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 46, § 150, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 56-59, ECHR 2004-XI).
  • OLG Nürnberg, 19.10.2010 - 2 Ws 227/10

    Keine Anklage gegen Polizeibeamte im Fall Tennessee Eisenberg

    Es ist nicht erkennbar, dass die oben unter B II 1.1) dargestellten Ermittlungen nicht im angemessenen Umfang oder mit nicht geeigneten Mitteln geführt worden wären ( EGMR , NJW 2005, 3405).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 50385/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,47153
EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 50385/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,47153)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18.10.2001 - 50385/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,47153)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18. Oktober 2001 - 50385/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,47153)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,47153) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

    GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 50385/99
    Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, ECHR 1999-I, p. 98, § 28).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht