Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZHEREBIN v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 51445/09
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09
• EGMR - 51445/09 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  The respondent State remains free, subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions set out in the Court's judgment (see, among other authorities, Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  Finally, the Court reiterates that its judgments serve not only to decide those cases brought before it but, more generally, to elucidate, safeguard and develop the rules instituted by the Convention, thereby contributing to the observance by the States of the engagements undertaken by them as Contracting Parties (see, among other authorities, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 154, Series A no. 25; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 86, Series A no. 39; and Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 26, ECHR 2003-IX).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I).

 
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  Finally, the Court reiterates that its judgments serve not only to decide those cases brought before it but, more generally, to elucidate, safeguard and develop the rules instituted by the Convention, thereby contributing to the observance by the States of the engagements undertaken by them as Contracting Parties (see, among other authorities, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 154, Series A no. 25; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 86, Series A no. 39; and Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 26, ECHR 2003-IX).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  In determining the length of detention pending trial under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, the period to be taken into consideration begins on the day the accused is taken into custody and ends on the day when the charge is determined, even if only by a court of first instance (see Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, § 9, Series A no. 7, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 145 and 147, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 49429/99

  CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  Although the primary purpose of the Convention system is to provide individual relief, its mission is also to determine issues on public-policy grounds in the common interest, thereby raising the general standards of protection of human rights and extending human rights jurisprudence throughout the community of the Convention States (see Karner, cited above, § 26, and Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, §§ 78 to 79, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  The Court observes that, since, its first judgment concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 104-21, ECHR 2002-VI), it has delivered more than 110 judgments against Russia in which a violation of Article 5 § 3 on account of the excessive length of detention was found.
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

  Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  In determining the length of detention pending trial under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, the period to be taken into consideration begins on the day the accused is taken into custody and ends on the day when the charge is determined, even if only by a court of first instance (see Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, § 9, Series A no. 7, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 145 and 147, ECHR 2000-IV).

• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 2335/09

  TKACHUK c. RUSSIE

  Quand ceux-ci se révèlent « pertinents'et « suffisants ", elle recherche de surcroît si les autorités nationales compétentes ont apporté une « diligence particulière'à la poursuite de la procédure (voir, parmi d'autres, Buzadji c. République de Moldova [GC], no 23755/07, § 87, CEDH 2016, Zherebin c. Russie, no 51445/09, §§ 49-54, 24 mars 2016, et Labita c. Italie [GC], no 26772/95, §§ 152-153, CEDH 2000-IV).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 19.11.2019 - C-653/19

  Spetsializirana prokuratura - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Justizielle …

  65 Vgl. u. a. EGMR, 24. März 2016, Zherebin gegen Russland (CE:ECHR:2016:0324JUD005144509, §§ 51, 60 und 62).
• EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 45767/09

  UTVENKO ET BORISOV c. RUSSIE

  Elle note que les juridictions internes n'ont pas recherché si une autre mesure préventive telle que l'assignation à domicile pouvait se substituer à la détention provisoire de l'intéressé (Zherebin c. Russie, no 51445/09, § 59, 24 mars 2016, et Aleksandr Makarov c. Russie, no 15217/07, §§ 138-139, 12 mars 2009).

 
• EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 40834/11

  KALINICHENKO c. RUSSIE

  La Cour note également que les juridictions internes n'ont pas recherché si une autre mesure préventive pouvait se substituer à la détention provisoire de l'intéressé (Zherebin c. Russie, no 51445/09, § 59, 24 mars 2016, et Aleksandr Makarov c. Russie, no 15217/07, §§ 138-139, 12 mars 2009).
• EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 63748/13

  PSHIBIYEV ET BEROV c. RUSSIE

  La Cour rappelle dans ce contexte qu'elle a conclu que la durée excessive de la détention provisoire de personnes suspectées ou accusées d'infractions pénales constitue un problème structurel dans l'ordre juridique russe résultant d'une pratique incompatible avec la Convention (Zherebin c. Russie, no 51445/09, §§ 74-80, 24 mars 2016).
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05

  SHKARUPA v. RUSSIA

  The Court has already, on numerous occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many other authorities, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X and Dirdizov, cited above, §§ 108-11; see also Zherebin v. Russia, no. 51445/09, communicated on 13 November 2012).
• EGMR, 05.05.2022 - 17730/08

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  1.5 years in custody pending the first set of criminal proceedings against him and has been serving a 10 years' prison sentence since 10/09/2003, by failing to consider alternative "preventive measures", and relying exclusively on the seriousness of the charges, the authorities extended his detention on grounds which, although "relevant", cannot be regarded as "sufficient" to justify its duration (compare, Zherebin v. Russia, no. 51445/09, §§ 56-62, 24 March 2016; and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 127-36, 22 May 2012).
• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 8797/16

  TAMASAUSKAS AND RADZEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  The Court will have regard in this connection to the compatibility of the amount with its own awards in similar cases, bearing in mind the principles which it has developed for assessing the amount of compensation to be awarded in respect of non-pecuniary damage in cases concerning inadequate conditions of detention (see, mutatis mutandis, Zherebin v. Russia, no. 51445/09, § 40, 24 March 2016).
• EGMR, 17.09.2015 - 13008/13

  KOVYAZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court has already, on numerous occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many other authorities, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012; Zherebin v. Russia, no. 51445/09, communicated on 13 November 2012; and Taranenko, cited above, §§ 52-55).
• EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10

  GAYDUKOV v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the recurrent nature of this grievance (see Zherebin and 9 Other Applications (dec.), no. 51445/09, § 3, 13 November 2012), the Court finds it to be the subject of its well-established case-law.
• EGMR, 07.09.2021 - 21237/19

  VAIDELYS v. LITHUANIA