Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,53693) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BELLER v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 51837/99
- EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99
Wird zitiert von ... (7) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99
Given its jurisdiction ratione temporis, the Court can only consider the period which has elapsed since 1 May 1993, although it will have regard to the stage reached in the proceedings on that date (see, among other authorities, Zwierzynski v. Poland, no. 30210/96, § 123, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99
To sum up, having regard to all the relevant points of law and fact, I have no doubt whatsoever that the applicant did have and still has "possessions" as far as her property rights are concerned at least in the form of "claims in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51 and Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, § 31). - EGMR, 06.05.1981 - 7759/77
Buchholz ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99
In its decision on the admissibility of the present case, the Court found that the failure to try an action within a reasonable time can on occasions have repercussions as regards respect for some other right guaranteed by the Convention (see Buchholz v. Germany, judgment of 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42, p. 22, § 65). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99
To sum up, having regard to all the relevant points of law and fact, I have no doubt whatsoever that the applicant did have and still has "possessions" as far as her property rights are concerned at least in the form of "claims in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51 and Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, § 31).
- EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Contrary to the Court's established case-law on the assessment of the reasonableness of the length of proceedings (see, among many other examples, Kudla, cited above, § 119-124; Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, §§ 58-60, 15 October 1999; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2005-VI; Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, § 67-71, 1 February 2005; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 28 and 33, 28 March 2006; and, in particular, Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 35, 11 October 2005), the courts did not examine the overall length of the proceedings but only selected parts of them. - EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 43702/02
GRABINSKI v. POLAND
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, §§ 68-70, 1 February 2005). - EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 52495/99
KOSS v. POLAND
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, 15 October 1999, § 60, Beller v. Poland no. 51837/99, § 67-71, 1 February 2005 ).
- EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 23759/02
PRZEPALKOWSKI v. POLAND
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, §§ 68-70, 1 February 2005). - EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 21246/05
GRACZYK v. POLAND
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, and Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, §§ 68-70, 1 February 2005). - EGMR, 22.04.2008 - 59857/00
BENNICH-ZALEWSKI v. POLAND
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, and Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, § 67, 1 February 2005). - EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 11522/03
KLIBER v. POLAND
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; and Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, §§ 68-70, 1 February 2005).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 51837/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,54334) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BELLER v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 51837/99
- EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 06.05.1981 - 7759/77
Buchholz ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 51837/99
The Court recalls that the failure to try an action within a reasonable time can on occasions have repercussions as regards respect for some other right guaranteed by the Convention (see Buchholz v. Germany, judgment of 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42, p. 22, § 65).