Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 13.05.2004

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,51971
EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99 (https://dejure.org/2005,51971)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.12.2005 - 53203/99 (https://dejure.org/2005,51971)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Dezember 2005 - 53203/99 (https://dejure.org/2005,51971)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,51971) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    VANYAN v. RUSSIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 (conviction) Violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (48)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

    NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
    The Court reiterates that, in order for costs and expenses to be awarded under Article 41, it must be established that that they were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention and were reasonable as to quantum (see Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII).
  • EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 48539/99

    Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Umgehungsschutz; Schweigerecht; materieller / …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
    The question which must be answered is whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was obtained, were fair (see Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, § 42, ECHR 2002-IX).
  • EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

    DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
    The Court points out that Article 6 of the Convention applies to proceedings where a person is charged with a criminal offence until that charge is finally determined (see Adolf v. Austria, judgment of 26 March 1982, Series A no. 49, p. 15, § 30; Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 12-15, §§ 22-26).
     
  • EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 14861/89

    LALA c. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
    It is also of crucial importance for the fairness of the criminal justice system that the accused be adequately defended, both at first-instance and on appeal (see Lala v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 13, § 33).
  • EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

    SCHENK c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
    While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is therefore primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, §§ 45-46, and, for a more recent example in a different context, Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1462, § 34).
  • EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78

    Adolf ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
    The Court points out that Article 6 of the Convention applies to proceedings where a person is charged with a criminal offence until that charge is finally determined (see Adolf v. Austria, judgment of 26 March 1982, Series A no. 49, p. 15, § 30; Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 12-15, §§ 22-26).
  • EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84

    Brandstetter ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
    The latter means, in a criminal case, that both prosecution and defence must be given the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed and the evidence adduced by the other party (see Brandstetter v. Austria, judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, p. 27, §§ 66-67).
  • EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

    BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

    En revanche, si un recours extraordinaire conduit de plein droit ou concrètement à faire entièrement rejuger le litige, l'article 6 s'applique de la manière habituelle à la procédure de « réexamen'(voir, par exemple, Sablon, précité, §§ 88-89 ; Vaniane c. Russie, no 53203/99, § 56, 15 décembre 2005; Zassourtsev c. Russie, no 67051/01, § 62, 27 avril 2006 ; Alexeïenko c. Russie, no 74266/01, § 55, 8 janvier 2009 ; Hakkar, décision précitée, et Rizi c. Albanie (déc.), no 49201/06, § 47, 8 novembre 2011).
  • EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 4455/10

    MARGUS v. CROATIA

    On the whole, the Court is called upon to examine whether the criminal proceedings against the applicant, in their entirety, were fair (see, among other authorities, Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, § 38; S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 43, ECHR 2002-V; and Vanyan v. Russia, no. 53203/99, § 63-68, 15 December 2005).
  • EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 8810/05

    DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA

    In several cases against Russia, the Court has found that applicable domestic law did not provide for sufficient safeguards in relation to test purchases of drugs, and has stated the need for their judicial or other independent authorisation and supervision (see Vanyan v. Russia, no. 53203/99, §§ 46-49, 15 December 2005; Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 135, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts); and Bannikova v. Russia, no. 18757/06, §§ 48-50, 4 November 2010).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.05.2004 - 53203/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,48323
EGMR, 13.05.2004 - 53203/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,48323)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.05.2004 - 53203/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,48323)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Mai 2004 - 53203/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,48323)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,48323) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht