Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BLAGA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Blaga v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BLAGA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 54443/10

  While it is not the Court's task to determine whether the proceedings in which the applicant was involved were properly stayed (see, mutatis mutandis, Broka v. Latvia, no. 70926/01, § 24, 28 June 2007), delays caused by the adjournment or suspension of proceedings pending the outcome of another case can be attributable to the State (see, mutatis mutandis, König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, §§ 104-05, Series A no. 27).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 54443/10

  Moreover, the States" obligations under Article 8 of the Convention are to be interpreted in harmony with the general principles of international law, and, in the context of international child abduction, particular account must be given to the provisions of the Hague Convention (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 29, Series A no. 18, and Ignaccolo-Zenide, cited above, § 95).
• EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 47457/99

  Bestimmung des Aufenthaltsorts gemeinsamer Kinder nach Trennung der Eltern; Eine …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 54443/10

  47457/99 and 47458/99, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 39388/05

  Maumousseau und Washington ./. Frankreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 54443/10

  In this area the decisive issue is whether a fair balance between the competing interests at stake - those of the child, of the two parents, and of public order - was struck, within the margin of appreciation afforded to States in such matters (see Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, § 62, 6 December 2007), bearing in mind, however, that the child's best interests must be the primary consideration (see Gnahoré v. France, no. 40031/98, § 59, ECHR 2000-IX) and that the objectives of prevention and immediate return correspond to a specific conception of "the best interests of the child" ( see X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, § 95, 26 November 2013).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 54443/10

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case; the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities; and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 51312/16

  M.K. c. GRÈCE

  I also note that in this respect the present judgment represents a deviation from the approach applied in several other Chamber judgments addressing similar situations of failure to enforce an order for the return of a wrongfully removed or retained child (see, for instance, Raw and Others v. France, no. 10131/11, 7 March 2013; López Guió v. Slovakia, no. 10280/12, 3 June 2014; Blaga v. Romania, no. 54443/10, 1 July 2014; M.A. v. Austria, no. 4097/13, 15 January 2015; and Sévère v. Austria, no. 53661/15, 21 September 2017).
• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 21347/21

  Z. v. CROATIA

  Insufficient reasoning in a ruling dismissing or accepting objections to the return of a child under the Hague Child Abduction Convention would be contrary to the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention (see X v. Latvia, cited above, §§ 106-7, and Blaga v. Romania, no. 54443/10, § 70, 1 July 2014).
• OLG Brandenburg, 06.10.2021 - 10 UF 75/21

  Ablehnung der Rückführung minderjähriger Kinder in den Heimatstaat Polen

  Insoweit können die Gerichte auch veranlasst sein, andere Umstände aus dem Umfeld des Kindes zu prüfen, bevor sie nach Ermessen entscheiden, die Rückgabe abzulehnen oder anzuordnen (EGMR (III. Sektion), Urt. v. 1.7.2014 - 54443/10, NJOZ 2015, 1148 Rn. 80).

 
• EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 14309/21

  I.Z.R. AND A.J.R. v. ROMANIA

  The Court finds that the domestic courts' reasoning on both counts is specific in the light of the circumstances of the applicants' case and took into account the best interests of the child (see Blaga v. Romania, no. 54443/10, § 70, 1 July 2014, and, contrast, Michnea, cited above, §§ 48-51).
• EGMR, 01.04.2021 - 16202/14

  M.V. v. POLAND

  In a number of its judgments, the Court has found a violation of Article 8 of the Convention, inter alia, in view of a similar or much shorter length of the Hague Convention proceedings (see G.N. v. Poland cited above, § 66-68 - seventeen months and two weeks; Blaga v. Romania, no. 54443/10, § 83, 1 July 2014 - fourteen months; Ferrari, cited above, § 54 and 56 - thirteen months; Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, § 82, 5 April 2005 - over twelve months; K.J. v. Poland, cited above, §§ 71 and 72, 1 March 2016 - twelve months; Karrer v. Romania, no. 16965/10, § 54, 21 February 2012 - eleven months; and R.S. v. Poland, no. 63777/09, § 70, 21 July 2015 - over six months; and, conversely, Strömblad v. Sweden, no. 3684/07, § 93, 5 April 2012 - less than twelve months).
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 1015/13

  BEKTAS c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  La Cour a établi dans un certain nombre d'affaires relatives à des enlèvements internationaux d'enfants sa pratique en ce qui concerne les griefs tirés de la violation du droit au respect de la vie familiale (voir, par exemple, Iosub Caras c. Roumanie, no 7198/04, §§ 32-40, 27 juillet 2006, Neulinger et Shuruk c. Suisse [GC], no 41615/07, §§ 131-140, CEDH 2010, X c. Lettonie [GC], no 27853/09, §§ 92-108, CEDH 2013, Blaga c. Roumanie, no 54443/10, §§ 64-91, 1er juillet 2014, G.S. c. Géorgie, no 2361/13, §§ 41-67, 21 juillet 2015, R.S. c. Pologne, no 63777/09, §§ 53-73, 21 juillet 2015, et K.J. c. Pologne, no 30813/14, §§ 51-75, 1er mars 2016).
• EGMR - 103/22 (anhängig)

  MAKRIS v. GREECE

  Have the proceedings for the return of the child, which started on 30 September 2019 and ended on 28 May 2021, 1asted too long, contrary to the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention and of the recommendations set out in Article 11 of the Hague Convention (see, notably, Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, § 82, 5 April 2005, Karrer v. Romania, no. 16965/10, § 54, 21 February 2012 and Blaga v. Romania, no. 54443/10, § 83, 1 July 2014)?.