Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LATIF FUAT ÖZTÜRK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

  DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 54673/00

  Consequently, the Government's objection that the case to be struck out should be rejected (see, among many others, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 54673/00

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  IVANTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 19074/05

  HASAN TUNÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  La Cour rappelle avoir déjà considéré que le recours en rectification d'arrêt, tel qu'il est prévu en droit turc pour les procédures civiles, constitue un recours interne efficace au sens des principes du droit international généralement reconnus (voir Molin Insaat c. Turquie, (déc.) no 23762/94, 7 septembre 1995, et Latif Fuat Öztürk et autres c. Turquie, no 54673/00, § 29, 2 février 2006).
• EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 48756/11

  MEHMET HIDAYET ALTUN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Sur ce point, la Cour rappelle avoir déjà considéré que le recours en rectification d'arrêt, tel qu'il est prévu en droit turc pour les procédures civiles, constitue un recours interne efficace au sens des principes du droit international généralement reconnus (Molin Insaat c. Turquie (déc.), no 23762/94, 7 septembre 1995, Latif Fuat Öztürk et autres c. Turquie, no 54673/00, § 29, 2 février 2006, et Hasan Tunç et autres c. Turquie, no 19074/05, § 36, 31 janvier 2017).

 
• EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 22486/05

  ULYANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 14313/07

  AKULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 66446/01

  GÖKTAS v. TURKEY

  The Court reiterates that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among many others, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI and Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006 and Mutlu v. Turkey, no. 8006/02, §§ 13-14, 10 October 2006).
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 18378/02

  HANBAYAT v. TURKEY

  The Court reiterates that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing their wish to pursue the case before the Court (see, among many others, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI, Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Mutlu v. Turkey, no. 8006/02, §§ 13-14, 10 October 2006).
• EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 1985/05

  SERGEY DENISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 25952/03

  DUZDEMIR AND GUNER v. TURKEY

  The Court reiterates that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among many others, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI; Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006; Mutlu v. Turkey, no. 8006/02, §§ 13-14, 10 October 2006).
• EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 10301/03

  GETIREN v. TURKEY

  It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among many others, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI; Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006; Mutlu v. Turkey, no. 8006/02, §§ 13-14, 10 October 2006; and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 03.12.2020 - 66687/09

  KISELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 40555/04

  ÜTEBAY v. TURKEY