Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention;Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13
• EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 56796/13

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

• EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 42337/12

  SUSO MUSA AND 4 OTHER CASES AGAINST MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  Further relevant domestic law concerning the case is to be found in Suso Musa v. Malta (no. 42337/12, §§ 23-32, 23 July 2013).

  Despite the Court's findings in the cases of Suso Musa v. Malta (no. 42337/12, §§ 58-59) and Aden Ahmed (cited above, §§ 121-22) that, even assuming that such a remedy applied in the applicant's case, it was also not effective, the Government failed to explain why such a remedy was still available to the applicant despite such limitation and the circumstances as appeared at the time.

  She relied on the case of Suso Musa v. Malta (no. 42337/12, 23 July 2013).

• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 43985/13

  ABDI AHMED AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  The Government further relied on the Court's general principles cited in Abdi Ahmed and Others v. Malta ((dec.), no. 43985/13, 16 September 2014) and to its findings in that case, where the Court had established that the situation having ended, the duration of proceedings no longer rendered the remedy ineffective.

  Further, the Court notes firstly that the circumstances of the present case are different to those in the case of Abdi Ahmed and Others v. Malta ((dec.), no. 43985/13, 16 September 2014), relied on by the Government.

• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12

  ADEN AHMED v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  The relevant articles of the above-mentioned Acts can be found in Aden Ahmed v. Malta (no. 55352/12, §§ 31-35, 23 July 2013).

  The applicant submitted that there existed no effective domestic remedy which should have been used; in fact most of the Government's arguments had already been rejected by the Court in its judgment in the case of Aden Ahmed v. Malta (no. 55352/12, 23 July 2013) concerning an immigrant detained at around the same time as the applicant in the present case.

 
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 29810/03

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  In determining whether detention conditions have attained the level of degrading treatment, the Court "will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3" (see Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, §§ 95-96, 24 January 2008).
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

  Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  36925/10, 21487/12, 72893/12, 73196/12, 77718/12 and 9717/13, § 234, 27 January 2015, with further references).
• EGMR, 27.07.2010 - 24340/08

  Abschiebungshaft, Malta, Rechtsweggarantie, effektiver Rechtsschutz, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  The applicant relied on the Court's findings in Louled Massoud v. Malta (no. 24340/08, 27 July 2010), whereby the Court held that the available remedies in the Maltese domestic system were ineffective and insufficient for the purposes of Article 5 § 4. In respect of Article 25 A (6) of the Immigration Act, she added that as a rule the Board granted bail in connection with removal orders, but has done so at least once in connection with a challenge as to the lawfulness of detention under regulation 11(10) mentioned above at paragraph 29. Nevertheless, bail could only be granted against a financial deposit (usually around 1, 000 euros (EUR)) as well as a third-party guarantee showing that the applicant will have accommodation and subsistence, conditions which were unlikely to be fulfilled by immigrants arriving by boat (as opposed to those overstaying visas).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  The Government referred to the Court's case-law (Sizarev v. Ukraine, no. 17116/04, 17 January 2013; Selcuk and Akser v. Turkey, nos. 23184/94 and 23185/94, 24 April 1998; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, ECHR 2002-III); and particularly Aden Ahmed (cited above), and the principles cited therein.
• EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 8256/07

  TABESH c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  To cite one example, the detention of an asylum seeker for three months on police premises pending the application of an administrative measure, with no access to any recreational activities and without proper meals, has been considered to be degrading treatment for the purposes of Article 3 (see Tabesh v. Greece, no. 8256/07, §§ 41- 44, 26 November 2009).
• EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 17116/04

  SIZAREV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  The Government referred to the Court's case-law (Sizarev v. Ukraine, no. 17116/04, 17 January 2013; Selcuk and Akser v. Turkey, nos. 23184/94 and 23185/94, 24 April 1998; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, ECHR 2002-III); and particularly Aden Ahmed (cited above), and the principles cited therein.
• EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 12186/08

  A.A. c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  They considered that the conditions of detention at issue could not be compared to those in facilities in respect of which the Court had found a violation (for example, Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, ECHR 2001-II; S.D. v. Greece, no. 53541/07, 11 June 2009; and A.A. v. Greece, no. 12186/08, 22 July 2010).
• EGMR, 24.04.1998 - 23184/94

  SELÇUK ET ASKER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 30138/02

  NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 72710/11

  YARASHONEN v. TURKEY
• EGMR - 57875/09 (anhängig)

  [FRE]

• VG Hannover, 23.02.2018 - 10 B 921/18

  Malta; systemische Mängel

  Die Mitgliedstaaten sind aber verpflichtet, sich zu vergewissern, dass die Bedingungen der Haft mit der Achtung der Menschenwürde vereinbar sind, die Gefangenen nicht Leiden oder Härten unterworfen sind, die die mit einer Haft unvermeidbar verbundenen Beeinträchtigungen übersteigen, und dass Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden der Gefangenen unter Berücksichtigung der praktischen Bedürfnisse der Haft angemessen sichergestellt sind (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 21.01.2011 - 30696/09 -, juris; EGMR, Urteil vom 03.05.2016 - 56796/13 -, HUDOC m.w.N.).

  Solche Umstände können eine Verletzung von Art. 3 EMRK zur Folge haben (vgl. dazu EGMR, Urteil vom 03.05.2016 - 56796/13 -, HUDOC m.w.N.; VG Karlsruhe, Beschluss vom 08.10.2014 - A 8 K 345/14 - VG Oldenburg, Beschluss vom 23.07.2014 - 12 B 1217/14 -, juris m.w.N.).

  Auch der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte stellte wiederholt eine Verletzung der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention durch Malta mit Blick auf die Inhaftierung von Asylbewerbern fest (vgl. Urteile vom 23.07.2013 - 42337/12 - Suso Musa/Malta -, vom 23.7.2013 - 55352/12 - Aden Ahmed/Malta -, vom 26.11.2015 - 10290/13 - Mahamed Jama/Malta -, und vom 03.05.2016 - 56796/13 - Abdi Mahamadu/Malta -, HUDOC).

• VG Stuttgart, 03.09.2021 - A 8 K 3990/21

  Schwachstellen des Asylverfahrens bzw. der Aufnahmebedingungen in Malta; …

  Die Mitgliedstaaten sind aber verpflichtet, sich zu vergewissern, dass die Bedingungen der Haft mit der Achtung der Menschenwürde vereinbar sind, die Gefangenen nicht Leiden oder Härten unterworfen sind, die die mit einer Haft unvermeidbar verbundenen Beeinträchtigungen übersteigen, und dass Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden der Gefangenen unter Berücksichtigung der praktischen Bedürfnisse der Haft angemessen sichergestellt sind (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 23.07.2013 - 55352/12 - Aden Ahmed v. Malta, HUDOC Rn. 86; EGMR, Urteil vom 03.05.2016 - 56796/13 - Abdi Mahamud v. Malta, HUDOC m.w.N.).