Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 58455/13 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
N.P. CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
N.P. AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
- EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 58455/13
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
N.P. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
POPOVSCHI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
- EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 58455/13
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 14.01.2003 - 27751/95
K.A. v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
It is not enough to show that a child could be placed in a more beneficial environment for his upbringing (see K. and T. v. Finland, cited above, § 173, and K.A. v. Finland, no. 27751/95, § 92, 14 January 2003). - EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 35348/06
R. AND H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
Firstly, the Court must examine whether, in the light of the case as a whole, the reasons adduced to justify the measures were "relevant and sufficient"; secondly it must be examined whether the decision-making process was fair and afforded due respect to the applicant's rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see K. and T. v. Finland, cited above, § 154; R.K. and A.K. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38000/05, § 34, 30 September 2008; Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 134, ECHR 2010; and R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35348/06, §§ 75 and 81, 31 May 2011). - EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 4547/10
Y.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
However, where the maintenance of family ties would harm the child's health and development, a parent is not entitled under Article 8 to insist that such ties be maintained (see Neulinger and Shuruk, cited above, § 136; R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 73; and Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4547/10, § 134, 13 March 2012).