Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MALEK v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the length of the proceedings Inadmissible under Art. 6-1 with regard to the other complaints Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 60553/00

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87

  PHILIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 60553/00

  The Court finds that no award can be made with respect to this claim, as the applicant chose to present his own case to the Court (see Philis v. Greece, judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, pp. 26-27, §§ 77-78; and Brincat v. Italy, judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-A, p. 13, § 29).
• EGMR, 26.11.1992 - 13867/88

  BRINCAT v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 60553/00

  The Court finds that no award can be made with respect to this claim, as the applicant chose to present his own case to the Court (see Philis v. Greece, judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, pp. 26-27, §§ 77-78; and Brincat v. Italy, judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-A, p. 13, § 29).

• EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 43447/19

  Streit um Justizreform: Polen verurteilt

  58812/15 and 4 others, § 160, 17 October 2019, and practising lawyers in Malek v. Austria, no. 60553/00, § 39, 12 June 2003, and Helmut Blum v. Austria, no. 33060/10, § 60, 5 April 2016.
• EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11

  PADLEWSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the Court's case-law (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, Malek v. Austria, no. 60553/00, § 48-49, 12 June 2003; Schmidt v. Austria, no. 513/05, § 24-29, 17 July 2008; Kincses v. Hungary, no. 66232/10, § 44-50, 27 January 2015; and Gollner v. Austria, no. 49455/99, § 24-25, 17 January 2002), the Court finds that the overall duration of the proceedings exceeded a "reasonable time".