Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00 (https://dejure.org/2015,26222)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.09.2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00 (https://dejure.org/2015,26222)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. September 2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00 (https://dejure.org/2015,26222)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,26222) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CASES OF FINGER, DIMITROV AND HAMANOV AND 54 OTHER CASES AGAINST BULGARIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AFFAIRES FINGER, DIMITROV ET HAMANOV ET 54 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA BULGARIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 48059/06
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48059/06
- EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00
- EGMR - 48059/06
Wird zitiert von ... (4)
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 29476/06
D.M.T. ET D.K.I. c. BULGARIE
Dans plusieurs autres affaires similaires contre la Bulgarie, la Cour a déjà constaté que le droit interne n'offrait aucune autre voie de recours effective permettant d'accélérer le cours des poursuites pénales ou d'obtenir une compensation pour durée excessive de la procédure pénale (voir, avec les références, Dimitrov et Hamanov c. Bulgarie, nos 48059/06 et 2708/09, §§ 92-97, 10 mai 2011). - EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
OSSO v. BULGARIA
Also, a request for fixing of time-limit could not provide effective redress in respect of delays resulting from courts' own failure to organise proper examination of the case, or in situations in which the proceedings had lasted too long without there being identifiable periods of inactivity (see Deyanov v. Bulgaria, no. 2930/04, §§ 69-70, 30 September 2010). - EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 13364/05
KECHEV c. BULGARIE
La disposition de l'article 239a fut reprise dans les articles 368-369 du CPP de 2006, puis elle fut abrogée en 2010 (voir aussi Dimitrov et Hamanov c. Bulgarie, nos 48059/06 et 2708/09, §§ 43-45, 10 mai 2011). - EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 23470/05
NICOLETA GHEORGHE c. ROUMANIE
Au regard des circonstances particulière de l'espèce, elle considère que la poursuite de l'examen de l'affaire s'impose au nom du respect des droits de l'homme nonobstant la valeur de l'amende (environ 17 euros) qui était à l'origine du grief tiré de l'article 6 de la Convention (voir, mutatis mutandis, Juhas Äuric c. Serbie, no 48155/06, §§ 56-58, 7 juin 2011 et Finger c. Bulgarie, no 37346/05, §§ 74-77, 10 mai 2011).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,55811) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARCHEVA AND SHTARBOVA v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - financial awards Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
MIKULIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
In view of what was at stake for the second applicant in the present case, that is her right to have her paternity established or refuted and thus to have her uncertainty as to the identity of her natural father eliminated, the Court considers that the competent national authorities were required by Article 6 § 1 to act with particular diligence in ensuring the progress of the proceedings (see Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 41, ECHR 2002 I).
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
In the instant case, the Court considers that the hourly rate of EUR 70 is excessive and that a reduction of the same is appropriate (see, a contrario, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 176 in fine, ECHR 2002-IV; Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 111, 30 January 2003; Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 75, 19 May 2004 and Rachevi, cited above, § 111, where the Court found an hourly rate of EUR 50 reasonable). - EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 38884/97
NIKOLOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
In the instant case, the Court considers that the hourly rate of EUR 70 is excessive and that a reduction of the same is appropriate (see, a contrario, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 176 in fine, ECHR 2002-IV; Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 111, 30 January 2003; Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 75, 19 May 2004 and Rachevi, cited above, § 111, where the Court found an hourly rate of EUR 50 reasonable). - EGMR, 19.05.2004 - 42027/98
TOTEVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
In the instant case, the Court considers that the hourly rate of EUR 70 is excessive and that a reduction of the same is appropriate (see, a contrario, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 176 in fine, ECHR 2002-IV; Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 111, 30 January 2003; Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 75, 19 May 2004 and Rachevi, cited above, § 111, where the Court found an hourly rate of EUR 50 reasonable). - EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 47877/99
RACHEVI v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
The Court notes that in similar cases against Bulgaria it has found that a complaint based on the direct applicability of the Convention in Bulgarian law is not an effective remedy and neither is a "complaint about delays" under Article 217a of the Code of Civil Procedure (see Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, § 100, 23 September 2004). - EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90
KEEGAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
The Court reiterates that it has held on numerous occasions that paternity proceedings fall within the scope of Article 8 of the Convention (see, for example, Rasmussen, cited above, § 33 and Keegan v. Ireland, judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, p. 18, § 45). - EGMR, 28.11.1984 - 8777/79
RASMUSSEN v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
The Court notes that it has previously recognised that an action contesting paternity is a matter of family law and, accordingly, that Article 6 of the Convention is applicable in its "civil" law part (see Rasmussen v. Denmark, judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, p. 13, § 32).
- EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 32003/13
SLADZEVSKIS v. LATVIA
At the same time, the delaying tactics used by a party do not absolve the authorities from their duty to ensure that proceedings are conducted within a reasonable time (see Karcheva and Shtarbova v. Bulgaria, no. 60939/00, § 47, 28 September 2006, and Mincheva v. Bulgaria, no. 21558/03, § 68, 2 September 2010). - EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 51683/19
KILCHES v. AUSTRIA
In this regard, the Court has held that even if the domestic authorities cannot be held responsible for the conduct of a respondent, the dilatory methods used by one of the parties do not relieve them of their obligation to ensure that the proceedings are conducted within a reasonable time (see Mincheva v. Bulgaria, no. 21558/03, § 68, 2 September 2010; and Kartcheva and Chtarbova v. Bulgaria, no. 60939/00, § 47, 28 September 2006).