Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TREGUBENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the right to a court Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 with regard to fairness Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the right of access to a court Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 21.10.2003 - 61333/00
• EGMR, 02.11.2004 - 61333/00

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2004 - 61333/00

  The Court reiterates that, in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention and were reasonable as to quantum (see, among many other authorities, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 30.04.2019 - C-556/17

  Torubarov - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und …

  53 Vgl. entsprechend auch EGMR, Urteil vom 2. November 2004, Tregubenko/Ukraine (CE:ECHR:2004:1102JUD006133300, §§ 34 bis 38), und EGMR, Urteil vom 6. Oktober 2011, Agrokompleks/Ukraine (CE:ECHR:2011:1006JUD002346503, §§ 150 und 151).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 6725/03

  LIZANETS v. UKRAINE

  In assessing the domestic judicial practices against their compatibility with the principle of legal certainty the Court primarily focused on the extraordinary review proceedings susceptible to undermine the finality of court judgments (cf., Popov v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 19960/04, § 52, 6 December 2005, Tregubenko v. Ukraine, no. 61333/00, § 36, 2 November 2004, Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-IX and Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, § 92, 9 November 2004).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 27865/02

  BOCVARSKA v.

  It is the established jurisprudence of this Court that the quashing of a final and binding judgment that conferred a "possession" on the applicant constitutes an interference with the applicant's right to that property (see Tregubenko v. Ukraine, no. 61333/00, § 51, 2 November 2004, and Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 74, ECHR 1999-VII).

 
• EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 75473/01

  KONDRASHOVA v. RUSSIA

  In the case of Tregubenko v. Ukraine (no. 61333/00, 2 November 2004) the Court found a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in that the quashing of a final judgment of pecuniary nature in the applicant's favour constituted a disproportionate interference with his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 63158/00

  TIMOTIYEVICH v. UKRAINE

  The Court has previously found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in similar cases against Ukraine, holding that such measures are incompatible with the principles of the rule of law and legal certainty enshrined in that provision (see Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, § 77, ECHR 2002-VII; Tregubenko v. Ukraine, no. 61333/00, §§ 44-45, 2 November 2004; Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, § 92, 9 November 2004).
• EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 55531/00

  SITKOV v. RUSSIA

  In the case Tregubenko v. Ukraine (no. 61333/00, § 46 et seq., 2 November 2004) the Court found a violation of Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 to the Convention in that the quashing of a final judgment of pecuniary nature in the applicant's favour constituted a disproportionate interference with his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AGROTEHSERVIS ET 7 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE L'UKRAINE

  Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AGROTEHSERVIS AND 7 OTHER CASES AGAINST UKRAINE

  Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 62608/00
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 62608/00
• EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 62608/00, 74104/01, 27640/02, 77317/01, 53500/99, 61333/00, 11370/02, 63158/00