Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BORIS KOSTADINOV v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KOSTADINOV c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3 MRK
  [FRA]

Wird zitiert von ... (21)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05

  DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  The questions whether the applicant has in fact been so affected and whether he or she is actually the victim of a breach go to the merits of the case (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, §§ 33 and 38, Series A no. 28; Dogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, § 93, ECHR 2004-VI (extracts); Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, § 106-07, ECHR 2011-IV; and Dimov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 30086/05, § 61, 6 November 2012).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

  BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  The burden to prove that this was the case rests on the Government (see, in general, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72 in fine, ECHR 2000-XII, and Petkov and Parnarov v. Bulgaria, no. 59273/10, § 47, 19 May 2015, and, specifically with respect to force used by the police in connection with mass demonstrations, Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, § 31, 29 November 2007; Samüt Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999/04, § 42, 27 January 2009; and Gazioglu and Others v. Turkey, no. 29835/05, § 43, 17 May 2011).
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  It is true that the police resorted to the use of force while trying to protect participants in the Sofia Gay Pride parade against possible attacks, and thus with a view to discharging Bulgaria's positive obligations under Articles 3, 11 and 14 of the Convention (see Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, §§ 66, 72 and 94-100, 12 May 2015).

 
• EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 29835/05

  GAZIOGLU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  The burden to prove that this was the case rests on the Government (see, in general, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72 in fine, ECHR 2000-XII, and Petkov and Parnarov v. Bulgaria, no. 59273/10, § 47, 19 May 2015, and, specifically with respect to force used by the police in connection with mass demonstrations, Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, § 31, 29 November 2007; Samüt Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999/04, § 42, 27 January 2009; and Gazioglu and Others v. Turkey, no. 29835/05, § 43, 17 May 2011).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  In relation to this latter point, it is settled case-law that when considering a claim for just satisfaction, the Court is not bound by domestic scales or standards (see, among other authorities, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 99 (a), Series A no. 94; Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 47, Series A no. 330-B; and Dimitrov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 77938/11, § 190, 1 July 2014), even in relation to costs referable to domestic proceedings (see König v. Germany (Article 50), 10 March 1980, § 23, Series A no. 36; Eckle v. Germany (Article 50), 21 June 1983, § 35, Series A no. 65; and Papamichalopoulos and Others, cited above, § 47).
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 59273/10

  PETKOV ET PARNAROV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  The burden to prove that this was the case rests on the Government (see, in general, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72 in fine, ECHR 2000-XII, and Petkov and Parnarov v. Bulgaria, no. 59273/10, § 47, 19 May 2015, and, specifically with respect to force used by the police in connection with mass demonstrations, Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, § 31, 29 November 2007; Samüt Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999/04, § 42, 27 January 2009; and Gazioglu and Others v. Turkey, no. 29835/05, § 43, 17 May 2011).
• EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05

  MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  However, it is settled case-law that such force will not be in breach of this Article only if it was indispensable and not excessive (see, in general, Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 63, 12 April 2007, with further references, and, in relation specifically to the use of force to quell mass unrest, Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 109, 2 April 2009).
• EGMR, 07.05.1974 - 1936/63

  NEUMEISTER v. AUSTRIA (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  In relation to this head of claim, the Court finds it appropriate firstly to distinguish between damage caused by a breach of the Convention and costs incurred by the applicant to prevent this breach or to obtain redress therefor (see Neumeister v. Austria (Article 50), 7 May 1974, § 43, Series A no. 17; The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (Article 50), 6 November 1980, § 16, Series A no. 38; Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere, cited above, § 14; and Dimitrov and Others, cited above, § 180).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99

  IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  However, it is settled case-law that such force will not be in breach of this Article only if it was indispensable and not excessive (see, in general, Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 63, 12 April 2007, with further references, and, in relation specifically to the use of force to quell mass unrest, Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 109, 2 April 2009).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  In this case, the purpose of the proceedings before the Bulgarian prosecuting authorities was precisely to obtain redress for the substantive breach of Article 3 of the Convention and to ensure compliance with the procedural limb of this Article (see, mutatis mutandis, De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 50, Series A no. 12; Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 18, Series A no. 32; and The Sunday Times, cited above, § 18).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 2594/07

  NAJAFLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1) (ARTICLE 50)
• EGMR, 21.06.1983 - 8130/78

  Eckle./. Deutschland
• EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

  Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
• EGMR, 18.10.1982 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN AND DE MEYERE v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 16999/04

  SAMÜT KARABULUT v. TURKEY

• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 15367/14

  SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  The burden to prove that this was the case rests on the Government (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII, and Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 53, 21 January 2016).
• EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  Russland muss Nawalny Entschädigung zahlen

  The burden to prove that this was the case rests on the Government (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII, and Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 53, 21 January 2016).
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06

  KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The burden to prove this rests on the Government (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 72-78, ECHR 2000-XII, and, among recent authorities, Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, §§ 52-54, 21 January 2016).

 
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 32731/17

  KOSTOV c. BULGARIE

  Par ailleurs, la Cour relève que le montant de l'indemnité proposée par le Gouvernement - une somme de 16 400 euros - est pleinement satisfaisant au regard des montants alloués par elle dans des affaires similaires (voir, par exemple, Boris Kostadinov c. Bulgarie, no 61701/11, §§ 65-76, 21 janvier 2016, Stevan Petrovic c. Serbie, nos 6097/16 et 28999/19, §§ 181-187, 20 avril 2021, et Trocin c. République de Moldova, no 23847/19, §§ 65-70, 16 mars 2021).
• EGMR, 19.04.2018 - 47145/14

  MAMMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  It follows that the Government are estopped from pleading non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, §§ 52-53, ECHR 2016 (extracts), and Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 44, 21 January 2016).
• EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  G.S. v. BULGARIA

  This raises the question whether the Government are estopped from pleading non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120/09, §§ 24-25, 8 April 2014; G.C. v. Italy, no. 73869/10, §§ 36-37, 22 April 2014; Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 44, 21 January 2016; and Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, §§ 52-54, 15 December 2016).
• EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 76813/16

  KUCHTA AND METEL v. POLAND

  The burden rests on the Government to demonstrate that this was the case (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII, and Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 53, 21 January 2016).
• EGMR, 08.06.2017 - 75832/13

  M.M. c. BULGARIE

  Il s'ensuit que le Gouvernement est forclos à exciper du non-épuisement des voies de recours internes (Khlaifia et autres c. Italie [GC], no 16483/12, § 52, CEDH 2016, voir aussi Dhahbi c. Italie, no 17120/09, §§ 24-25, 8 avril 2014, et Boris Kostadinov c. Bulgarie, no 61701/11, § 44, 21 janvier 2016).
• EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 71333/10

  LAVRENTYEV v. RUSSIA

  The general principles concerning the obligation of the High Contracting Parties under Article 3 of the Convention not to submit persons under their jurisdiction to inhuman or degrading treatment or torture in the course of encounters with the police have been summarised in Bouyid v. Belgium ([GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-88, ECHR 2015), and Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria (no. 61701/11, § 53, 21 January 2016).
• EGMR, 03.09.2020 - 11157/11

  YORDANOVI c. BULGARIE

  Les questions de savoir si le requérant a été réellement lésé et s'il est effectivement victime d'une violation de la Convention relèvent du fond de l'affaire (Dimov et autres c. Bulgarie, no 30086/05, § 61, 6 novembre 2012, et Boris Kostadinov c. Bulgarie, no 61701/11, § 45, 21 janvier 2016).
• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 17054/08

  GREMINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 32617/16

  APOPII v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 34720/16

  KVIRIKASHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 20649/18

  R.R. AND R.D. v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 24.10.2017 - 40384/06

  DEVYATKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.03.2023 - 46419/16

  ABISHOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 4670/16

  CANUDA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 23.05.2019 - 37023/13

  KANCIAL v. POLAND
• EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 3627/07

  SOKOVNIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 2674/07

  SERGEY RYABOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 25238/08

  SARSEMBAYEV v. RUSSIA