Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DUNN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  In applying the subjective test - that is, endeavouring to ascertain the personal conviction or interest of a given judge in a particular case - the Court has consistently held that the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53; Kyprianou, cited above, § 119; Sander v. the United Kingdom, no. 34129/96, § 25, ECHR 2000-V; Szypusz v. the United Kingdom, no. 8400/07, § 80, 21 September 2010; and Toziczka v. Poland, no. 29995/08, 24 July 2012).

  Any misgivings of an accused, although important, cannot be decisive for its determination (see Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53; Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 194, ECHR 2003-VI; Gregory, cited above, § 45; Sander, cited above, § 27; Szypusz, cited above, § 81; Grieves v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 57067/00, § 69, ECHR 2003-XII; and Hanif and Khan, cited above, § 140).

• EGMR - 61779/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  The Court recalls that it is of fundamental importance in a democratic society that the courts inspire confidence in the public (Hanif and Khan v. the United Kingdom, nos. 52999/08 and 61779/08, § 138-140, 20 December 2011).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  Any misgivings of an accused, although important, cannot be decisive for its determination (see Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53; Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 194, ECHR 2003-VI; Gregory, cited above, § 45; Sander, cited above, § 27; Szypusz, cited above, § 81; Grieves v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 57067/00, § 69, ECHR 2003-XII; and Hanif and Khan, cited above, § 140).

 
• EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 8400/07

  SZYPUSZ v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  In applying the subjective test - that is, endeavouring to ascertain the personal conviction or interest of a given judge in a particular case - the Court has consistently held that the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53; Kyprianou, cited above, § 119; Sander v. the United Kingdom, no. 34129/96, § 25, ECHR 2000-V; Szypusz v. the United Kingdom, no. 8400/07, § 80, 21 September 2010; and Toziczka v. Poland, no. 29995/08, 24 July 2012).
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 9718/03

  GEORGEL AND GEORGETA STOICESCU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  In other words, to ensure compatibility with Article 6, 1imitations must pursue a legitimate aim and there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (Georgel and Georgeta Stoicescu v. Romania, no. 9718/03, 26 July 2011; Levages Prestations Services v. France judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, § 40; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, § 65; Tolstoy Miloslavsky, cited above; and Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 333-B, § 31).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  In other words, to ensure compatibility with Article 6, 1imitations must pursue a legitimate aim and there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (Georgel and Georgeta Stoicescu v. Romania, no. 9718/03, 26 July 2011; Levages Prestations Services v. France judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, § 40; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, § 65; Tolstoy Miloslavsky, cited above; and Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 333-B, § 31).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  The right of access to a court is inherent in the right to a fair trial set out in Article 6 § 1 (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 23805/94

  BELLET c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  In other words, to ensure compatibility with Article 6, 1imitations must pursue a legitimate aim and there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (Georgel and Georgeta Stoicescu v. Romania, no. 9718/03, 26 July 2011; Levages Prestations Services v. France judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, § 40; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, § 65; Tolstoy Miloslavsky, cited above; and Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 333-B, § 31).
• EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

  HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  To that end it has constantly stressed that a tribunal must be impartial from an objective as well as a subjective point of view (see Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989, § 46, Series A no. 154; Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, ECHR 2005-XIII, § 118; Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 30, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III; Gregory v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 43 Reports 1997-I; and Hanif and Khan, cited above, § 138).
• EGMR, 24.08.1993 - 13924/88

  NORTIER c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 62793/10

  The Court is cognisant of the fact that where judges exercise consecutive functions in the same proceedings, what matters is not the fact of dual participation, but the scope and nature of the decisions taken (Nortier v. the Netherlands, 24 August 1993, § 33, Series A no. 267; and Hauschildt v. Denmark, cited above, § 21).
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 77050/11

  PEREIRA DA SILVA c. PORTUGAL

  Dès lors, la Cour considère que, bien que son objet soit à première vue seulement de savoir si une question d'intérêt général est en jeu (en sens contraire, voir Dunn c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 62793/10, § 35, 23 octobre 2012), un tel recours implique en réalité nécessairement une appréciation du fond de la cause.
• EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 47450/11

  VALCHEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  In addition, in many cases the former Commission and the Court have reviewed various aspects of permission-to-appeal or similar proceedings under that provision (see Webb v. the United Kingdom, no. 33186/96, Commission decision of 2 July 1997, unreported; ITC (Isle of Man), P.S.W.H. and A.G.S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45619/99, 29 February 2000; Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42295/98, 11 July 2000; Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716/00, ECHR 2001-VI; Walczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 77395/01, 7 May 2002; Stepinska v. France, no. 1814/02, §§ 15-19, 15 June 2004; Guz v. Poland (dec.), no. 29293/02, 19 May 2005; Martinie v. France [GC], no. 58675/00, §§ 53-55, ECHR 2006-VI; Stepenska v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 24079/02, 12 June 2006; Jaczkó v. Hungary, no. 40109/03, § 29, 18 July 2006; Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 106, 18 December 2007; Mrúz v. Hungary, no. 3261/05, § 20, 14 October 2008; Lajos Németh v. Hungary, no. 3840/05, § 20, 21 October 2008; Makuszewski v. Poland, no. 35556/05, § 53, 13 January 2009; Grori v. Albania, no. 25336/04, § 199, 7 July 2009; Wnuk v. Poland (dec.), no. 38308/05, 1 September 2009; Jakupi v. Albania (dec.), no. 11186/03, 1 December 2009; Nersesyan v. Armenia (dec.), no. 15371/07, §§ 23-25, 19 January 2010; Bachowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 32463/06, 2 November 2010; and Dunn v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62793/10, §§ 27-40, 23 October 2012).
• EGMR, 27.03.2014 - 15928/14

  LAMBRICH c. ALLEMAGNE

  Par ailleurs, si le droit à un procès équitable garanti par l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention englobe, entre autres, le droit des parties au procès à présenter les observations qu'elles estiment pertinentes pour leur affaire, il ne garantit pas aux plaideurs une issue favorable (Andronicou et Constantinou c. Chypre, arrêt du 9 octobre 1997, § 201, Recueil 1997-VI ; Klasen c. Allemagne, no 75204/01, § 43, 5 octobre 2006 ; Dunn c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 62793/10, 23 octobre 2012).