Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2014,11217
EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,11217)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28.05.2014 - 62892/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,11217)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28. Mai 2014 - 62892/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,11217)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,11217) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention Take proceedings) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan) No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Article 5-1-f - Extradition) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Article 5-1-f - Expulsion) Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (21)

  • EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

    Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

    The Court reiterates that, since its Azimov judgment, which concerned a similar complaint (cited above, § 153), it has found a violation of Article 5 § 4 in a number of cases against Russia on account of the absence of any domestic legal provision which could have allowed an applicant to bring proceedings for a judicial review of his detention pending expulsion (see Kim, §§ 39-43, and Rakhimov, §§ 148-50, both cited above; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; and also Egamberdiyev, cited above, § 64).
  • EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15

    Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben

    The Court reiterates that, since its Azimov judgment, which concerned a similar complaint (see Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013), it has found a violation of Article 5 § 4 in a number of cases against Russia on account of the absence of any domestic legal provision which could have allowed an applicant to bring proceedings for judicial review of his or her detention pending expulsion (see L.M. and Others v. Russia, § 141, and Kim, §§ 39-43, both cited above; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 11.06.2019 - 35332/17

    S.S. AND B.Z. v. RUSSIA

    The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 11916/15

    R. v. RUSSIA

    It is also unclear what will happen after the expiry of the two-year time-limit, since the applicant will clearly remain in an irregular situation in terms of immigration law and will again be liable to expulsion and, consequently, to detention on those grounds (see Azimov, cited above, § 171; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, § 191, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev, cited above, § 92; and Khalikov, cited above, § 73).
  • EGMR, 15.09.2016 - 41651/10

    KHAMROEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    In that period, as afterwards, the applicants pursued their asylum claims in Ukraine (compare Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, § 158, 28 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 20999/14

    MUKHITDINOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court has been previously confronted with many cases concerning forced return from Russia to Uzbekistan of the persons accused by the Uzbek authorities of criminal, religious and political activities (see most recently, Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, 26 June 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, 28 May 2014; Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, 7 May 2014, with further references).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 58923/14

    KHOLMURODOV c. RUSSIE

    Pour plus de détails sur le droit et la pratique internes relatifs à la détention à des fins d'extradition, il est renvoyé à l'arrêt Akram Karimov c. Russie (no 62892/12, §§ 69-87, 28 mai 2014).
  • EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 66373/13

    KHALIKOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court has previously had the task of examining many cases concerning the forced return from Russia to Uzbekistan of persons accused by the Uzbek authorities of criminal, religious and political activities (see, most recently, Egamberdiyev cited above; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, 28 May 2014; and Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, 7 May 2014, with further references).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 68900/13

    ESHONKULOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court has been previously confronted with many cases concerning forced return from Russia to Uzbekistan of the persons accused by the Uzbek authorities of criminal, religious and political activities (see most recently, Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, 26 June 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, 28 May 2014; Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, 7 May 2014, with further references).
  • EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

    A.N. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 55080/12

    CHANTURIDZE v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 48528/09

    YAKOVENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

    CHKHIKVISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 59609/17

    B.U. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 46580/08

    MALIMONENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

    K.I. v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 53494/09

    ORUDZHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 70440/10

    KOSHEVOY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 78386/14

    SAAKYAN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 32779/15

    M.S.S. v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 2236/16

    S.S. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht