Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention Take proceedings) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan) No violation of ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Akram Karimov v. Russia

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  BOZANO v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  The Court reiterates that detention may be unlawful if its purported purpose differs from the real one (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, § 60; Conka, cited above, § 42, ECHR 2002-I; and Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, § 142, 31 May 2011).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  The Court reiterates at the outset that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94), and that the right to political asylum is not explicitly protected by either the Convention or its Protocols (see Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 135, ECHR 2007 I (extracts)).
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  Since the nature of the Contracting States" responsibility under Article 3 in cases of this kind lies in the act of exposing an individual to the risk of ill-treatment, the existence of the risk must be assessed primarily with reference to those facts which were known or ought to have been known to the Contracting State at the time of the expulsion (see Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 107, Series A no. 215).

 
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 45276/99

  Tansania, CUF, Civic United Front, Oppositionelle, Inhaftierung, Folter, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  These standards imply that the ill-treatment the applicant alleges he will face if returned must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this is relative, depending on all the circumstances of the case (see Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276/99, § 60, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  Nonetheless, there is no question of adjudicating on or establishing the responsibility of the receiving country, whether under general international law, under the Convention, or otherwise (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 91, Series A no. 161).
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 1948/04

  Somalia, Abschiebungshindernis, zielstaatsbezogene Abschiebungshindernisse, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  The Court reiterates at the outset that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94), and that the right to political asylum is not explicitly protected by either the Convention or its Protocols (see Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 135, ECHR 2007 I (extracts)).

• EGMR, 06.07.2021 - 34804/17

  A.B. v. RUSSIA

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments of Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia (no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts)) and Akram Karimov v. Russia (no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 67485/17

  R.R. AND A.R. v. RUSSIA

  RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 8. The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 65122/17

  S.B. AND S.Z. v. RUSSIA

  RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 9. The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).

 
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 2236/16

  S.S. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 11.06.2019 - 35332/17

  S.S. AND B.Z. v. RUSSIA

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 59609/17

  B.U. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removal from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 70440/10

  KOSHEVOY v. RUSSIA

  The applicable general principles have been summarised in Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, §§ 88-92, ECHR 2016 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 142-144, 28 May 2014.
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  A.N. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

  K.I. v. RUSSIA

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).