Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  POSOKHOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses - claim dismissed (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  POSOKHOV c. RUSSIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Frais et dépens - demande rejetée (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 63486/00
• EGMR, 04.03.2003 - 63486/00

Wird zitiert von ... (28)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

  DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2003 - 63486/00

  The Court further reiterates that a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).

• EGMR, 09.01.2013 - 21722/11

  OLEKSANDR VOLKOV c. UKRAINE

  The phrase "established by law" covers not only the legal basis for the very existence of a "tribunal" but also the composition of the bench in each case (see Buscarini v. San Marino (dec.), no. 31657/96, 4 May 2000, and Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-IV).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 04.03.2021 - C-357/19

  Nach Ansicht von Generalanwalt Bobek sind Entscheidungen eines …

  82 EGMR, 4. März 2003, Posokhov/Russland (CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD006348600, § 43); EGMR, 29. April 2008, Barashkova/Russland (CE:ECHR:2008:0429JUD002671603, § 32).
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 14370/03

  MOSKOVETS v. RUSSIA

  Therefore, the domestic law in that respect had been complied with (unlike the situation in the cases of Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, ECHR 2003-IV, and Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/01, 13 April 2006).

  The Court reiterates that it has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in other Russian cases in which it had been established that the selection of lay judges had been conducted contrary to the requirements of the Lay Judges Act (see Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, §§ 40-44, ECHR 2003-IV; Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/05, §§ 38-44, 13 April 2006; Shabanov and Tren v. Russia, no. 5433/02, §§ 28-32, 14 December 2006; and, most recently, Barashkova v. Russia, no. 26716/03, §§ 30-34, 29 April 2008).

 
• EuGH, 12.09.2019 - C-542/18

  Überprüfung - Gericht für den öffentlichen Dienst der Europäischen Union - …

  Somit verlangt die Rechtsprechung des EGMR für die Feststellung, dass das Recht auf ein auf Gesetz beruhendes Gericht verletzt wurde und diese Verletzung (einzeln betrachtet) zugleich zu einer Verletzung des durch Art. 6 Abs. 1 EMRK garantierten Rechts auf ein faires Verfahren geführt hat, eine "eklatante"( 36 Urteile des EGMR vom 31. Mai 2011, Kontalexis/Griechenland, Beschwerde Nr. 59000/08, CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD005900008, §§ 41 und 44, und vom 4. März 2003, Posokhov/Russland, Beschwerde Nr. 63486/00, CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD006348600, §§ 39 und 43. < schließen ) oder "schwerwiegende"( 37 Urteil des EGMR vom 9. Juli 2009, 11atovskiy/Russland, Beschwerde Nr. 6945/04, CE:ECHR:2009:0709JUD000694504, § 40. < schließen ) Verletzung des geltenden nationalen Rechts.
• EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 26716/03

  BARASHKOVA v. RUSSIA

  In conclusion the applicant referred to the case of Posokhov v. Russia (no. 63486/00, 4 March 2003) where a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of unlawful composition of the bench was established.

  The Court recalls that it has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in other Russian cases with similar factual circumstances (see Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, §§ 40-44, ECHR 2003-IV; Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/05, §§ 38-44, 13 April 2006; and Shabanov and Tren v. Russia, no. 5433/02, §§ 28-32, 14 December 2006).

• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 38697/02

  LARYAGIN v. RUSSIA

  He requested that the judgments of 27 December 2000 and 18 October 2002 be quashed, having referred to the Court's conclusion in the case of Posokhov v. Russia (no. 63486/00, ECHR 2003-IV).

  The Court reiterates that it has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in other Russian cases with similar factual circumstances (see Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, §§ 40-44, ECHR 2003-IV; Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/05, §§ 38-44, 13 April 2006; and Shabanov and Tren v. Russia, no. 5433/02, §§ 28-32, 14 December 2006).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 12.09.2019 - C-542/18 RX-II

  Réexamen Simpson/ Rat

  36 Urteile des EGMR vom 31. Mai 2011, Kontalexis/Griechenland, Beschwerde Nr. 59000/08, CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD005900008, §§ 41 und 44, und vom 4. März 2003, Posokhov/Russland, Beschwerde Nr. 63486/00, CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD006348600, §§ 39 und 43.
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 38623/03

  PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that the phrase "established by law" covers not only the legal basis for the very existence of a "tribunal" but also the composition of the bench in each case (see Buscarini v. San Marino (dec.), no. 31657/96, 4 May 2000, and Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-IV).
• EGMR, 20.07.2006 - 29458/04

  SOKURENKO AND STRYGUN v. UKRAINE

  The Court has also found that a court is not established by law where the rules governing the composition of a court have not been respected (as, for example, in Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, ECHR 2003-IV, judgment of 4 March 2003, and Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/01, 13 April 2006).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 12.09.2019 - C-543/18 RX-II

  Réexamen HG/ Kommission

  36 Urteile des EGMR vom 31. Mai 2011, Kontalexis/Griechenland, Beschwerde Nr. 59000/08, CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD005900008, §§ 41 und 44, und vom 4. März 2003, Posokhov/Russland, Beschwerde Nr. 63486/00, CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD006348600, §§ 39 und 43.
• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 33192/07

  KAÇIU AND KOTORRI v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 25.10.2011 - 54809/07

  Auf Gesetz beruhendes Gericht (Wahrung des gesetzlichen Richters bei Abordnungen: …
• EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 6110/03

  KUPTSOV AND KUPTSOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 1555/04

  ZAKHARKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 46134/09

  MAMMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 8026/04

  YEGORYCHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 75911/01

  PETR SEVASTYANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 5433/02

  SHABANOV AND TREN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 1935/07

  ZATYNAYKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 47737/10

  SHAYKHATAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 24490/03

  ANDREY ISAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 1985/05

  SERGEY DENISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 88/05

  DANILOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 39279/05

  IWANCZUK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 6945/04

  ILATOVSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 27912/02

  SULJAGIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 44925/06

  KLEYN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 31264/04

  WIECZOREK v. POLAND