Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SEMENOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SEMENOV v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

  LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it discloses a violation of Article 11 of the Convention in the light of its findings in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia (nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7 February 2017).

  Article 11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant in a peaceful assembly, namely the applicant's administrative arrest and conviction for participating in an unauthorised public event (Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7 February 2017).

• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  Their judgments, however, contained no analysis as to why they viewed the "clearly political nature" of the banner as problematic, given that it contained no incitement to violence or rejection of democratic principles (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 41462/17

  LAGUNA GUZMAN v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  He acted peacefully and did not create any disturbance of public order (see Laguna Guzman v. Spain, no. 41462/17, §§ 33, 51-52, 6 October 2020, with further references, and, by contrast, Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, § 41, 7 October 2008).

 
• EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 10346/05

  EVA MOLNÁR c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  He acted peacefully and did not create any disturbance of public order (see Laguna Guzman v. Spain, no. 41462/17, §§ 33, 51-52, 6 October 2020, with further references, and, by contrast, Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, § 41, 7 October 2008).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  Their judgments, however, contained no analysis as to why they viewed the "clearly political nature" of the banner as problematic, given that it contained no incitement to violence or rejection of democratic principles (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

  SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  Furthermore, the domestic courts omitted to indicate what the alleged differences were between the declared aim of the demonstration and the applicant's banner (see Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 45, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08

  FÁBER v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  The Court will examine this complaint under Article 10 of the Convention, taking into account the general principles it has established in the context of Article 11 of the Convention (see Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 19 and §§ 32-41, 24 July 2012).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 72881/01

  BRANCHE DE MOSCOU DE L'ARMEE DU SALUT c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12

  Having regard to its findings above, the Court does not find it necessary to continue a separate examination of this complaint (see Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, § 100, ECHR 2006-XI).