Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RAZNIAK v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3 MRK
  Partly inadmissible No violation of Art. 5-3 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 6767/03

  As from that date he was detained "after conviction by a competent court", within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (a) and, consequently, that period of his detention falls outside the scope of Article 5 § 3 (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 104).

  The Court notes that the general principles regarding the right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention were stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI; McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-...; and Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), with further references).

• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04

  BAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 6767/03

  The Court notes that the general principles regarding the right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention were stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI; McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-...; and Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), with further references).
• EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88

  MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 6767/03

  However, it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question (see, for instance, Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175/01, 15 November 2005, § 31-42; Trzaska v. Poland, no. 25792/94, 11 July 2000; and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII, p. 3302, § 162 and Wloch v. Poland, no. 27785/95, § 125, ECHR 2000-XI, both with reference to Megyeri v. Germany, judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, p. 11, § 22).

• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 36249/14

  LISOVSKIJ v. LITHUANIA

  8824/09 and 42836/12, § 69, 9 July 2015; compare and contrast Chraidi v. Germany, no. 65655/01, § 44, ECHR 2006-XII, and Razniak v. Poland, no. 6767/03, §§ 10 and 33, 7 October 2008).
• EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 18480/06

  KURATOW c. POLOGNE

  La Cour rappelle que, si la procédure au titre de l'article 5 § 4 de la Convention ne doit pas toujours s'accompagner de garanties identiques à celles que l'article 6 prescrit pour les procès civils ou pénaux, il faut qu'elle revête un caractère judiciaire et offre des garanties adaptées à la nature de la privation de liberté en question (voir, par exemple, Reinprecht c. Autriche, no 67175/01, 15 novembre 2005, §§ 31-42 ; Razniak c. Pologne, no 6767/03, 7 octobre 2008, § 52).