Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 3 EMRK; Art. 6 Abs. 1 Satz 1 EMRK; Art. 5 EMRK; § 112 StPO; § 119 Abs. 3 StPO
  Isolationshaft (Einzelhaft; Kontaktsperre; konkrete Begründung und Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz; medizinische [psychiatrische] Betreuung; Untersuchungshaftvollzug) und unmenschliche Behandlung (absolutes Folterverbot); Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit; Schweigerecht ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROHDE v. DENMARK

  Art. 3 MRK
  No violation of Art. 3 (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 69332/01
• EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  When assessing conditions of detention, account has to be taken of the cumulative effects of these conditions, as well as the specific allegations made by the applicant (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  Furthermore, in considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of this provision (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  The Court recalls that the authorities are under an obligation to protect the health of persons deprived of liberty and the lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see, among others, McGlinchey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 50390/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-V, and Ilhan v. Turkey (GC), no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see Labita v. Italy (GC), no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  Furthermore, in considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of this provision (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 50390/99

  McGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  The Court recalls that the authorities are under an obligation to protect the health of persons deprived of liberty and the lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see, among others, McGlinchey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 50390/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-V, and Ilhan v. Turkey (GC), no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95

  KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  In the judgment Keenan v. United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001-III, §§ 113-116, the Court was struck by the lack of medical notes concerning the applicant, who was an identifiable suicide risk.

• EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 24069/03

  ÖCALAN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)

  (see Ilascu and Others, cited above, § 438; see also, for a finding of no violation of Article 3 in the case of different conditions of detention, Rohde v. Denmark, no. 69332/01, § 97, 21 July 2005).