Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 7198/04, 16965/10, 54443/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. September 2018 - 7198/04, 16965/10, 54443/10 (https://dejure.org/2018,30749)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,30749) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IOSUB CARAS CONTRE LA ROUMANIE ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IOSUB CARAS AGAINST ROMANIA AND 2 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
- EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 7198/04, 16965/10, 54443/10
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,68220) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IOSUB CARAS v. ROMANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 5 MRK
Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 and P1-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (first applicant) Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (second applicant) Costs and ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
- EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 7198/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
With the Government, the Court recalls that it is not within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34; and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 32842/96
NUUTINEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
The positive obligations imposed on States by Article 8 include taking measures to ensure a parent's reunification with his or her child (see Ignaccolo-Zenide, cited above, § 94, and Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 127, ECHR 2000-VIII). - EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46833/99
DE DIEGO NAFRIA c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
They relied on authorities such as Winterwerp v. the Netherlands (judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 20, § 46), Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain (no. 56673/00, § 61, ECHR 2003-V) and De Diego Nafría v. Spain (no. 46833/99, § 39, 14 March 2002).
- EGMR, 26.06.2003 - 48206/99
MAIRE v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
Having regard to the sums awarded in comparable cases (see Ignaccolo-Zenide, § 117; Sylvester, § 84; Iglesias Gil and A.U.I., § 67, and Monory, § 96, cited above, Sophia Gudrun Hansen v. Turkey, no. 36141/97, § 115, 23 September 2003, as well as Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 82, ECHR 2003-VII), and making an assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41, the Court awards the first applicant EUR 20, 000 under this head. - EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 36141/97
HANSEN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
Having regard to the sums awarded in comparable cases (see Ignaccolo-Zenide, § 117; Sylvester, § 84; Iglesias Gil and A.U.I., § 67, and Monory, § 96, cited above, Sophia Gudrun Hansen v. Turkey, no. 36141/97, § 115, 23 September 2003, as well as Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 82, ECHR 2003-VII), and making an assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41, the Court awards the first applicant EUR 20, 000 under this head. - EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90
McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
If they have not, there will have been a failure to respect their family life and the interference resulting from the decision will not be capable of being regarded as "necessary" within the meaning of Article 8." (see the... W. v. the United Kingdom judgment [of 8 July 1987, Series A no. 121-A], pp. 28 and 29, §§ 62 and 64, McMichael v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B, p. 55, § 87 and Ignaccolo-Zenide, cited above, § 99). - EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
In such cases, the standing as the natural parent suffices to afford him or her the necessary power to apply to the Court on the child's behalf, too, in order to protect the child's interests (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 138, ECHR 2000-VIII, Iglesias Gil et Urcera Iglesias v. Spain (dec.), no. 56673/00, 5 March 2002 and Sylvester v. Austria (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
With the Government, the Court recalls that it is not within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34; and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).