Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOARE c. ROUMANIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'art. 6-1 Violation de l'art. 13 Préjudice moral - réparation Dommage matériel - demande rejetée (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 72439/01

  La Cour rappelle que le caractère raisonnable de la durée d'une procédure s'apprécie suivant les circonstances de la cause et eu égard aux critères consacrés par la jurisprudence de la Cour, en particulier la complexité de l'affaire, le comportement du requérant et celui des autorités compétentes (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Pélissier et Sassi c. France [GC], no 25444/94, § 67, CEDH 1999-II).

• EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 40756/06

  VLAD AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see, for instance, Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517/01 and 77722/01, § 26, ECHR 2005-VIII; Georgescu v. Romania, no. 25230/03, §§ 93- 96, 13 May 2008; and Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 29, 16 June 2009) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04

  BOROBAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517/01 and 77722/01, § 26, ECHR 2005-VIII, and Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 29, 16 June 2009).
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 24916/05

  FLORIN IONESCU v. ROMANIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517/01 and 77722/01, § 26, ECHR 2005-VIII, and Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 29, 16 June 2009).

 
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 24964/09

  DZHIOYEVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Such a situation may, according to the Court´s case law, engage Article 2 of the Convention (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI; Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 109, 16 June 2009; Trévalec v. Belgium, no. 30812/07, § 55-61, 14 June 2011; Abuyeva and Others, cited above, §§ 200 and 203).
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 2256/09

  NANIYEVA AND BAGAYEV v. GEORGIA

  According to the Court's jurisprudence, an immediate danger to life caused by the conduct of the State agents, can engage Article 2 of the Convention even in situations, when no death occurred (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI; Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 109, 16 June 2009; Trévalec v. Belgium, no. 30812/07, § 55-61, 14 June 2011).
• EGMR, 27.07.2010 - 34728/02

  ABABEI v. ROMANIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517/01 and 77722/01, § 26, ECHR 2005-VIII; and Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 29, 16 June 2009).