Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JASINSKI v. POLAND
Art. 3, Art. 8 MRK
No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 8 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01
The Court also points out that where an individual, when taken into police custody, is in good health, but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-11, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01
Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, pp. 25-26, § 34, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01
Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, pp. 25-26, § 34, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
- EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01
The Court also points out that where an individual, when taken into police custody, is in good health, but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-11, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01
The Court reiterates that any "interference by a public authority" with the right to respect for correspondence will contravene Article 8 of the Convention unless it is "in accordance with the law", pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article and is "necessary in a democratic society" in order to achieve them (see, among many other authorities, Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 32, § 84; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 16, § 34, and Niedbala v. Poland no. 27915/95, § 78). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01
The Court reiterates that any "interference by a public authority" with the right to respect for correspondence will contravene Article 8 of the Convention unless it is "in accordance with the law", pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article and is "necessary in a democratic society" in order to achieve them (see, among many other authorities, Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 32, § 84; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 16, § 34, and Niedbala v. Poland no. 27915/95, § 78).
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 8933/05
TOMASZEWSCY c. POLOGNE
Pour l'établissement des faits allégués, la Cour se sert du critère de la preuve « au-delà de tout doute raisonnable'; une telle preuve peut néanmoins résulter d'un faisceau d'indices, ou de présomptions non réfutées, suffisamment graves, précis et concordants (Berktay c. Turquie, no 22493/93, § 165, 1er mars 2001, Jasinski c. Pologne, no 72976/01, § 35, 6 décembre 2007, Grimailovs c. Lettonie, no 6087/03, § 101, 25 juin 2013).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.11.2013 - 31583/96, 43120/05, 31038/06, 13637/03, 42332/06, 20138/03, 24205/06, 26846/05, 31622/07, 20841/02, 35833/03, 31116/03, 55470/00, 44025/08, 38816/97, 39631/06, 34907/05, 36161/05, 20251/04, 8713/03, 23623/07, 72976/01, 26744/02, 8363/04, 31820/06, 44521/0 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KLAMECKI ET 57 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KLAMECKI AND 57 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 31583/96
- EGMR, 30.04.2002 - 31583/96
- EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 31583/96
- EGMR, 20.11.2013 - 31583/96, 43120/05, 31038/06, 13637/03, 42332/06, 20138/03, 24205/06, 26846/05, 31622/07, 20841/02, 35833/03, 31116/03, 55470/00, 44025/08, 38816/97, 39631/06, 34907/05, 36161/05, 20251/04, 8713/03, 23623/07, 72976/01, 26744/02, 8363/04, 31820/06, 44521/0
Wird zitiert von ...
- EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97
BAGINSKI v. POLAND
The Court has already dealt with a number of similar cases against Poland that arose out of the fact that under domestic criminal legislation applicable at the material time there was no possibility for a person detained at the investigative stage to be brought before anyone other than a prosecutor (see, among many other examples, G.K. v. Poland (dec.), no. 38816/97, 8 December 1998, unreported).