Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 11.12.2019 - 34459/08, 53329/08, 27150/02, 6982/04, 34448/08, 12146/02, 42894/04, 35528/03, 28270/02, 5325/02, 35075/97, 10457/08, 34456/08, 34458/08, 41166/05, 14558/03, 34465/08, 34468/08, 74069/01, 2620/05, 35561/05, 28152/02, 77361/01, 10435/08, 14738/06, 22261/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABDULKADIR DEMIR CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 94 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABDULKADIR DEMIR AGAINST TURKEY AND 94 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 34459/08
- EGMR, 11.12.2019 - 34459/08, 53329/08, 27150/02, 6982/04, 34448/08, 12146/02, 42894/04, 35528/03, 28270/02, 5325/02, 35075/97, 10457/08, 34456/08, 34458/08, 41166/05, 14558/03, 34465/08, 34468/08, 74069/01, 2620/05, 35561/05, 28152/02, 77361/01, 10435/08, 14738/06, 22261/03
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 74069/01, 76380/01, 74703/01, 16809/02, 25710/02, 25714/02, 30383/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ÇIÇEK AND ÖZTEMEL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93
IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 74069/01
Whilst, a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances, it may not be such as to impair the essence of the right protected under Article 6 § 1 (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 74069/01
The Court reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, p. 84, § 59).
- EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 33994/06
GÜLER v. TURKEY
As for the second objection, that the complaints under Article 1 of the Protocol No. 1 are manifestly ill-founded, the Court observes that it has dismissed similar objections in its previous case-law (Çiçek and Öztemel and Others, nos. 74069/01, 74703/01, 76380/01, 16809/02, 25710/02, 25714/02 and 30383/02, § 37, 3 May 2007; Ekici and Others v. Turkey (no. 28877/03, § 26, 23 September 2008).74069/01, 74703/01, 76380/01, 16809/02, 25710/02, 25714/02 and 30383/02, § 42, 3 May 2007; Ekici and Others v. Turkey (no. 28877/03, 23 September 2008, § 32).