Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 77562/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,32465) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAN LEONARD BAND CLUB c. MALTE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation de l'art. 6-1 (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAN LEONARD BAND CLUB v. MALTA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 77562/01
- EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 77562/01
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 34130/96
MOREL c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 77562/01
As to the subjective test, the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see, among other authorities, Padovani v. Italy, judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, § 26, and Morel v. France, no. 34130/96, § 41, ECHR 2000-VI). - EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 8562/79
FELDBRUGGE v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 77562/01
In this respect, the actual name given to the proceedings in the domestic legal system or the fact that the national courts have considered them as an extraordinary remedy cannot be considered determinant: what is decisive is the nature and the scope of the proceedings in issue (see, mutatis mutandis and with reference to the concept of "civil rights and obligations", Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands, judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99, pp. 12-13, § 28). - EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 77562/01
As to the subjective test, the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see, among other authorities, Padovani v. Italy, judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, § 26, and Morel v. France, no. 34130/96, § 41, ECHR 2000-VI). - EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65
DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 77562/01
As the applicant company had alleged, in substance, the unlawfulness of the second-instance judgment, its application was similar to an appeal on points of law before a court of cassation, a remedy to which Article 6 has consistently been held to be applicable (see, for instance, Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 13-15, §§ 25-26).
- BGH, 02.04.2009 - III ZA 2/09
Besorgnis der Befangenheit eines Richters bei Mitwirkung an der Entscheidung über …
Demgegenüber stelle es nach der Entscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte vom 7. Oktober 2008, der sich auf seine Entscheidung vom 29. Juli 2004 in Sachen San Leonard Band Club v. Malta (Nr. 77562/01 ECHR 2004-IX) bezogen habe, einen Verstoß gegen Art. 6 Abs. 1 der Konvention dar, wenn Richter ihre eigenen angeblichen Fehler bewerten und über sie entscheiden und damit über sich selbst urteilen müssten.
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 77562/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,64580) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAN LEONARD BAND CLUB CONTRE MALTE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises pour l'exécution de l'engagement auquel a été subordonnée la solution de l'affaire (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAN LEONARD BAND CLUB AGAINST MALTA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken for the execution of the undertakings attached to the solution of the case (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 77562/01
- EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 77562/01
Wird zitiert von ... (9)
- EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Enfin, manifestement, on ne se trouve pas en l'espèce dans un cas comparable à l'affaire San Leonard Band Club c. Malte (no 77562/01, § 63, CEDH 2004-IX), où les membres de la formation de jugement étaient amenés à déterminer s'ils avaient ou non commis une erreur d'interprétation ou d'application du droit, c'est-à-dire à se juger eux-mêmes et à apprécier leur propre capacité à appliquer la loi. - EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 55997/14
DOS SANTOS CALADO ET AUTRES c. PORTUGAL
La procédure devant le juge rapporteur fait ainsi entièrement partie de la procédure d'admissibilité des recours constitutionnels prévue à l'article 78-A de la LOTC, le comité de trois juges n'est donc pas une entité à part entière et autonome appelée à se prononcer sur la question litigieuse (comparer avec San Leonard Band Club c. Malte, no 77562/01, § 61-63, CEDH 2004-IX, Driza c. Albanie, no 33771/02, § 78-79, CEDH 2007-V (extraits), Kayasu c. Turquie, nos 64119/00 et 76292/01, § 121, 13 novembre 2008, Pereira da Silva c. Portugal, no 77050/11, § 59-60, 22 mars 2016, Warsicka c. Pologne, no 2065/03, § 41, 16 janvier 2007, et Binder c. Allemagne (déc.), no 44455/07, 20 septembre 2011). - EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 55759/07
MARESTI v. CROATIA
The Court firstly observes that the actual name given to the proceedings in the domestic legal system or the fact that the national jurisdictions have considered them as an extraordinary remedy cannot be considered determinant: what is decisive is the nature and the scope of the proceedings at issue (see San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 41, ECHR 2004-IX).
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 4429/09
SEBALJ v. CROATIA
"23. The Court firstly observes that the actual name given to the proceedings in the domestic legal system or the fact that the national jurisdictions have considered them as an extraordinary remedy cannot be considered determinant: what is decisive is the nature and the scope of the proceedings at issue (see San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 41, ECHR 2004-IX). - EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 8602/09
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. c. ROUMANIE
La Cour rappelle qu'elle a déjà conclu que l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention, pris sous son volet civil, pouvait être applicable à l'examen d'une demande de réouverture d'une procédure civile (San Leonard Band Club c. Malte, no 77562/01, §§ 47-48, CEDH 2004-IX). - EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 17209/02
ZARB ADAMI v. MALTA
The Court considers that it is not necessary to ascertain whether the authorities raised the objection of non-exhaustion before the Constitutional Court and whether a failure to do so might result in the Government being estopped from raising a similar objection in Strasbourg (see, mutatis mutandis, San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 46, CEDH 2004- IX). - EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
DEBELIC v. CROATIA
The Court firstly observes that the actual name given to the proceedings in the domestic legal system or the fact that the national jurisdictions have considered them as an extraordinary remedy cannot be considered determinant: what is decisive is the nature and the scope of the proceedings at issue (see San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 41, ECHR 2004-...). - EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 73009/13
GRADINSCAK v. CROATIA
"23. The Court firstly observes that the actual name given to the proceedings in the domestic legal system or the fact that the national jurisdictions have considered them as an extraordinary remedy cannot be considered determinant: what is decisive is the nature and the scope of the proceedings at issue (see San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 41, ECHR 2004-IX). - EGMR, 04.11.2021 - 19300/12
GLAZYRIN v. UKRAINE
The actual name given to the proceedings in the domestic legal system or the fact that the national jurisdictions have considered them as an extraordinary remedy cannot be considered determinant: what is decisive is the nature and the scope of the proceedings at issue (see San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 41, ECHR 2004-IX).