Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÄRZTEKAMMER FÜR WIEN AND DORNER v. AUSTRIA

  Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÄRZTEKAMMER FÜR WIEN AND DORNER v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Besprechungen u.ä.

• lehofer.at (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Ärztekammer Wien und Dorner / Österreich - Begriff "Heuschrecke" als unethische Herabsetzung eines Wettbewerbers

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ÄRZTEKAMMER FÜR WIEN AND DORNER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 07.06.2012 - 38433/09

  CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  The Court reiterates that the term "victim", used in Article 34 of the Convention, denotes the person directly affected by the act or omission which is in issue (see Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 92, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  The classification of a statement as one of fact or as a value judgment is a matter which, in the first place, falls within the margin of appreciation of the national authorities - in particular, the courts (see, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 55, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 40998/98

  ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN SHIPPING LINES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  In order to determine whether any given legal person falls within one of the two above categories, account must be taken of its legal status and, where appropriate, the rights that status gives it, the nature of the activity it carries out, the context in which it is carried out, and the degree of its independence from the political authorities (see Radio France and Others v. France (dec.), no. 53984/00, § 26, ECHR 2003-X, and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v. Turkey (no. 40998/98, §§ 78-81, ECHR 2007-V).

 
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 106, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

  MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  The Court reiterates that, under its case-law, Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing the necessity of an interference, but this margin is subject to European supervision as regards both the relevant rules and the decisions applying them (see markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165).
• EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39069/97

  KRONE VERLAG GmbH & Co. KG (N° 3) c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  The Court reiterates that, in the past, it has held that section 1 of the Unfair Competition Act - which prohibits unfair commercial practice or any other unfair action which might affect the competitive capability of a business in a significant way for competitive purposes - was sufficiently precise for the purpose of Article 10 of the Convention and, accordingly, that an interference based on that provision was prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 10 (see, Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 3), no. 39069/97, § 24, ECHR 2003-XII).
• EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 27447/07

  KHARLAMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  However, the Court can change this classification under its supervisory role (see Kharlamov v. Russia, no. 27447/07, § 31, 8 October 2015; Pinto Pinheiro Marques v. Portugal, no. 26671/09, § 43, 22 January 2015).
• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  Therefore, the State enjoys a margin of appreciation as to the means it provides under domestic law by which a company can challenge the truth and limit the damage of allegations which risk harming its reputation (see Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 94, ECHR 2005- II).
• EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 15088/89

  JACUBOWSKI v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  Furthermore, the Court emphasises that a wider margin of appreciation entrusted to the States is essential in the complex and fluctuating area of unfair competition (see Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG (no. 3), cited above § 30, and Jacubowski v. Germany, 23 June 1994, § 26, Series A no. 291-A).

• BVerwG, 12.12.2019 - 8 C 8.19

  Kein Grundrechtsschutz für überwiegend von der öffentlichen Hand getragenen …

  Für die Abgrenzung staatlicher von nichtstaatlichen Organisationen im Sinne von Art. 34 EMRK sind im Wesentlichen der rechtliche Status und die mit ihm verliehenen Befugnisse, die Natur der Betätigung der Organisation, deren Kontext und der Grad ihrer Unabhängigkeit von den politischen Behörden maßgeblich (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 16. Februar 2016 - Nr. 8895/10 Ärztekammer für Wien und Dorner v. Austria - Rn. 35 f.;… Entscheidung vom 15. November 2011 - Nr. 28502/08 TRANSPETROL v. Slovakia - Rn. 60 ff.;… Urteil vom 13. Dezember 2007 - 40998/98 Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v. Turkey - Rn. 79 ff.).
• EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 39685/19

  SASMA c. TÜRKIYE

  Quant à la nécessité de l'ingérence, la Cour renvoie aux principes généraux concernant le droit à la liberté d'expression et les critères qui doivent guider son appréciation - et surtout celle des juridictions internes - dans la mise en balance de ce droit avec le droit à la réputation commerciale d'une société (Ärztekammer für Wien et Dorner c. Autriche, no 8895/10, §§ 62-67, 16 février 2016, et OOO Regnum c. Russie, no 22649/08, §§ 58-63 et 66, 8 septembre 2020).
• EGMR, 18.11.2020 - 54155/16

  SLOVÉNIE c. CROATIE

  In order to determine whether any given legal person falls within one of the two above categories, account must be taken of its legal status and, where appropriate, the rights that status gives it, the nature of the activity it carries out, the context in which it is carried out, and the degree of its independence from the political authorities (see Ärztekammer für Wien and Dorner v. Austria, no. 8895/10, § 35, 16 February 2016, as well as Österreichischer Rundfunk v. Austria, no. 35841/02, §§ 48-54, 7 December 2006; Radio France and Others v. France (dec.), no. 53984/00, § 26, ECHR 2003-X, and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, cited above, §§ 78-81).

 
• EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10

  KURSKI v. POLAND

  Therefore, in a democratic system the limits of permissible criticism are much wider with regard to newspapers than in relation to a private citizen (see, mutatis mutandis, Ärztekammer für Wien and Dorner v. Austria, no. 8895/10, § 65, 16 February 2016).
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 40355/14

  IHSAN DOGRAMACI BILKENT ÜNIVERSITESI c. TURQUIE

  Pour déterminer si tel est le cas pour une personne morale donnée autre qu'une collectivité territoriale, il y a lieu de prendre en considération son statut juridique et, le cas échéant, les prérogatives qu'il lui donne, la nature de l'activité qu'elle exerce et le contexte dans lequel s'inscrit celle-ci, et son degré d'indépendance par rapport aux autorités politiques (Radio France et autres c. France (déc.), no 53984/00, § 26, CEDH 2003-X (extraits), et Ärztekammer für Wien et Dorner c. Autriche, no 8895/10, §§ 35-36, 16 février 2016).
• EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 40597/08

  RUNGAINIS v. LATVIA

  Where it examines an application lodged under Article 10, the Court will also examine the way in which the information was obtained and its veracity, as well as the severity of the sanction imposed (see, for recent authorities, Medzlis Islamske Zajednice Brcko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 17224/11, §§ 88 and 118, ECHR 2017 with further references, and Ärztekammer für Wien and Dorner v. Austria, no. 8895/10, § 64, 16 February 2016 ).