Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARELIN v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KARELIN v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (138) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 25.06.1992 - 13778/88
THORGEIR THORGEIRSON v. ICELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
In the case of Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland (judgment of 25 June 1992, §§ 46-54, Series A no. 239) the Court found no violation of Article 6 § 1, having established that the applicant's fears of a lack of impartiality were not objectively justified.It found no violation of Article 6 on the ground that at the sittings held in the public prosecutor's absence the court was not called upon to investigate the merits of the case, let alone to assume any function which might have been fulfilled by the prosecutor had he been present (judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 24, § 53).
- EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously examined applications relating to the administrative offence proceedings under Russian law and found violations of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular on account of the fairness requirement (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 94-100, ECHR 2006-III; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 97-120; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 36-69, 3 October 2013; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, §§ 81-94, 31 July 2014; and Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 76-85, 4 December 2014). - EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously considered that appearances may be of importance in court proceedings, for instance for assessing compliance with the requirement of objective impartiality, or for the sake of preserving the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 77, ECHR 2007-IV; Sara Lind Eggertsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 31930/04, § 42, ECHR 2007-VIII; and Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 32, 1 April 2010).
- EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously examined applications relating to the administrative offence proceedings under Russian law and found violations of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular on account of the fairness requirement (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 94-100, ECHR 2006-III; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 97-120; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 36-69, 3 October 2013; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, §§ 81-94, 31 July 2014; and Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 76-85, 4 December 2014). - EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
Thus, the appeal proceedings did not remedy the impartiality matter arising at the trial (see De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 33, Series A no. 86, and Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, § 134, ECHR 2005-XIII). - EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V). - EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 5447/03
KOROLEV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously considered that appearances may be of importance in court proceedings, for instance for assessing compliance with the requirement of objective impartiality, or for the sake of preserving the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 77, ECHR 2007-IV; Sara Lind Eggertsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 31930/04, § 42, ECHR 2007-VIII; and Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 32, 1 April 2010). - EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
DRIZA c. ALBANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
In that connection, the Court considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V). - EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 17995/02
STOIMENOV v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
In the context of the principle of equality of arms, in the case of Stoimenov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 17995/02, §§ 40-42, 5 April 2007) the Court also referred to "appearances" when concluding that an opinion submitted by the Forensic Science Bureau, a State agency, was akin to incriminating evidence used by the prosecution and that the refusal of an alternative expert examination and the applicant's inability to challenge the Bureau's report in the circumstances of that case had resulted in a violation of the equality of arms (see also Shulepova v. Russia, no. 34449/03, §§ 65-67, 11 December 2008). - EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 34449/03
SHULEPOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07
KASPAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1774/11
NEMTSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they disclose violations of Article 5 § 1, Article 6 § 1, Article 6 § 3 (d), Article 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia (no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014); Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015); Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016); Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia (nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018); Navalnyy v. Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix.6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016);.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016);.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 40408/18
GORYUNKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 60-84, 20 September 2016) and Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, § 168, 5 January 2016).6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
- EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 76201/17
KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 60-84, 20 September 2016) and Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, § 168, 5 January 2016).6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 38503/18
MIRONOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 60-84, 20 September 2016) and Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, § 168, 5 January 2016).6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
- EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 51766/21
RYAKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO). - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 09.03.2017 - C-685/15
Online Games u.a. - Art. 49 und 56 AEUV - Glücksspiele - Glücksspielmonopol in …
29 Dazu zählen die Urteile vom 15. Dezember 2005, Kyprianou/Zypern (CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD007379701, §§ 118, 121 und 126 bis 128), vom 18. Mai 2010, 0zerov/Russland (CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD006496201, §§ 51 bis 54), und vom 20. September 2016, Karelin/Russland (CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD000092608).55 Urteil vom 20. September 2016, Karelin/Russland (CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD000092608).
- EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 4604/17
DMITRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019, and Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017 as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 40133/21
PAPULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 38346/21
VASIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocol in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 21782/21
ZHUKOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 28232/22
FIGURKA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 1097/18
CHIRKUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 24722/18
SLIVIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 35579/21
KINZHABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 44147/21
POGORELOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 53913/15
BORISOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 50067/18
BORODIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47784/18
ZINCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 41806/21
KAMENTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 16047/21
SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 12166/19
ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 2097/22
SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 38671/21
PEREVOZCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 2523/21
PETROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 25187/15
LUTSEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 71114/17
OLSHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 40064/21
MAMONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 43191/21
KIRSANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 44630/21
KOROLKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 46570/18
NURUSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 13038/18
SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 32180/21
YELYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 52365/22
VAKULKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 39222/21
PROGUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 63772/17
BUKHTENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 33196/22
ABROSIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 31649/22
STRELETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 13238/21
DANKOVSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 28133/21
KULVINSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 46694/21
BOROVKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 40486/21
PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 57580/21
SOLOVYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 54089/21
LEVKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 25863/21
ILYIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 33633/21
GUSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 54470/21
IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 55480/21
PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 32174/21
YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08
TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47048/21
MAKSIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 48029/21
YERMOLAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 45205/22
ATAMANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 51373/21
USTINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 57518/22
BOBROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 28538/21
BIREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 38070/21
SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 49997/21
KANYGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 57870/21
GENERALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 25870/21
GRYAZEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 884/22
PANTENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 43487/21
MOLCHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 43566/21
GORODNICHEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 43655/21
PULUDI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 52077/22
NAZAREDSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41071/18
TINGAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 69539/12
IMRET v. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 4815/18
KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 61147/13
TREVOGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 52342/20
LAVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 20948/13
MEZAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 34241/16
KHORRSHR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 44292/18
FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 27284/17
KOZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 43267/21
SAVCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 44105/21
DORONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 50116/18
ABAKUMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 2954/18
MAZANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 15326/19
SARANCHUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 44850/18
KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 23169/18
VARACHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 2825/21
STALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 51074/21
AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 3345/18
OVCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 83654/17
SAVELYEVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 984/15
MAZUROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 41853/21
NADAREYSHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24326/18
KUSHTAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 65015/19
BUZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 23158/20
MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 2838/22
BORIS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 51391/21
TARASENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 16001/17
KAPITONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 54923/21
GALIMULLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 26870/19
ANDREYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 60851/12
VARZHABETYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 4792/22
ABAKUMETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 75231/17
YURGILEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 8793/17 (anhängig)
FERENETS v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 711/18
POPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 14839/21
BAKHMATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 54250/18
KOLESNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 21527/18
KOTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 16154/19
OOO ORION AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 2829/18
BOYARSHINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 41761/20
KUSHNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 13679/18
NIKOLENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 44712/18 (anhängig)
KADYROV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
- EGMR - 74186/17 (anhängig)
ORLOVSKIY AND SANGORSKIY v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
- EGMR - 14379/18 (anhängig)
NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
- EGMR - 75484/14 (anhängig)
MONAKHOV v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
- EGMR - 24712/21 (anhängig)
KUZMIN v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
- EGMR - 73383/17 (anhängig)
MOCHALOV v. RUSSIA and17 other applications
- EGMR - 43224/17 (anhängig)
ZAVOROTNYKH v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 78796/17
GORSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 75530/17
ABLYAKIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 33409/17 (anhängig)
SAULYAK v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications
- EGMR - 11180/18 (anhängig)
ZHILKIN v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
- EGMR - 719/19 (anhängig)
YERSHOV v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
- EGMR, 25.05.2023 - 13359/19
RECHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 56109/13
KAPUSTINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 35000/13
TSUKANOV AND TORCHINSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 27023/18 (anhängig)
YELMAKOV v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
- EGMR - 78686/17 (anhängig)
VASHCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
- EGMR - 83527/17 (anhängig)
PETROV v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
- EGMR - 47409/18 (anhängig)
HILL v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
- EGMR - 48403/18 (anhängig)
FAYZRAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA and 11 other applications
- EGMR - 13644/21 (anhängig)
GRESKO v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
- EGMR - 39000/18 (anhängig)
STRUNIN v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
- EGMR - 226/18 (anhängig)
YEVSTIFEYEV v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
- EGMR - 2388/18 (anhängig)
BATUSOVA v. RUSSIA and 12 other applications
- EGMR - 84346/17 (anhängig)
YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 26200/20
KULAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 74343/17 (anhängig)
VALKOVICH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 76249/17 (anhängig)
ZBOROSHENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.04.2023 - 70345/17
SLASTENIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 16694/13
ASAINOV AND SIBIRYAK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 47810/17 (anhängig)
SEMENOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 41535/17 (anhängig)
SHIROKOV v. RUSSIA