Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1989,9712
EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83 (https://dejure.org/1989,9712)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.11.1989 - 10572/83 (https://dejure.org/1989,9712)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. November 1989 - 10572/83 (https://dejure.org/1989,9712)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1989,9712) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • afp 1988, 231
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (90)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79

    Barthold ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
    This is so in spheres such as that of competition, in which the situation is constantly changing in accordance with developments in the market and in the field of communication (see the Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 22, § 47, and, mutatis mutandis, the Müller and Others judgment, cited above, Series A no. 133, p. 20, § 29).

    The Court must confine its review to the question whether the measures taken on the national level are justifiable in principle and proportionate (see, inter alia, the above-mentioned Barthold judgment, Series A no. 90, p. 25, § 55).

    In my view - and here too I find myself in agreement with the joint dissenting opinion - it is necessary to ask whether it was established convincingly (see the Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 25, § 58) that the private interests of the Club were more important than the general interest, in accordance with which not only the specialised reader but also the public as a whole should have been able to acquaint themselves with facts having a certain importance in the context of the struggle of small and medium-sized retail undertakings against the large-scale distribution companies.

    [2] Handyside judgment, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, § 49; Sunday Times, cited above, p. 40, § 65; Barthold judgment, 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 26, § 58; Lingens judgment, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, § 41; and Müller and Others judgment, 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 22, § 33.

  • EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84

    MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
    Such information cannot be excluded from the scope of Article 10 § 1 (art. 10-1) which does not apply solely to certain types of information or ideas or forms of expression (see, mutatis mutandis, the Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 19, § 27).

    This is so in spheres such as that of competition, in which the situation is constantly changing in accordance with developments in the market and in the field of communication (see the Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 22, § 47, and, mutatis mutandis, the Müller and Others judgment, cited above, Series A no. 133, p. 20, § 29).

    [2] Handyside judgment, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, § 49; Sunday Times, cited above, p. 40, § 65; Barthold judgment, 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 26, § 58; Lingens judgment, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, § 41; and Müller and Others judgment, 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 22, § 33.

  • EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11508/85

    BARFOD c. DANEMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
    The Court has consistently held that the Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing the existence and extent of the necessity of an interference, but this margin is subject to a European supervision as regards both the legislation and the decisions applying it, even those given by an independent court (see, as the most recent authority, the Barfod judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, p. 12, § 28).

    In exercising its power of review, the Court must look at the impugned court decision in the light of the case as a whole (see the above-mentioned Barfod judgment, Series A no. 149, p. 12, § 28).

    [5] Barfod judgment, 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, p. 12, § 28; see also Barthold judgment, cited above, loc.

  • EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

    SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
    The interpretation and application of such legislation are inevitably questions of practice (see the Sunday Times judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, § 49).

    [1] See inter alia Klass and Others judgment, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, p. 21, § 42, and Sunday Times judgment, 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 41, § 65.

  • EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

    Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
    [1] See inter alia Klass and Others judgment, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, p. 21, § 42, and Sunday Times judgment, 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 41, § 65.
  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
    [2] Handyside judgment, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, § 49; Sunday Times, cited above, p. 40, § 65; Barthold judgment, 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 26, § 58; Lingens judgment, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, § 41; and Müller and Others judgment, 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 22, § 33.
  • BVerfG, 15.11.1982 - 1 BvR 108/80

    Boykottaufruf

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
    "As the Federal Constitutional Court held in its decision of 15 November 1982 (1 BvR 108/80 and others [Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, volume 62, pp. 230-248]), the requirements which must be satisfied in order for freedom of expression and of the press to override other legal interests protected under statutes of general application are not fulfilled where an item published in the press is intended to promote, in the context of commercial competition, certain economic interests to the detriment of others.
  • EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 53649/09

    Meinungsfreiheit gilt auch für Werbung

    Die vorliegende Beschwerde verlangt eine Prüfung des angemessenen Gleichgewichts, das zwischen dem Recht des Beschwerdeführers auf Achtung seines Privatlebens unter dem Blickwinkel der dem Staat nach Artikel 8 der Konvention obliegenden positiven Pflichten und der Meinungsfreiheit der Gesellschaft nach Artikel 10 der Konvention herzustellen ist, der auch auf kommerzielle Meinungsäußerungen Anwendung findet (M../. Deutschland, 20. November 1989, Rdnr. 26, Serie A Band 165), da er "jeder Person" die Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung zusichert, ohne danach zu unterscheiden, ob dies unter Umständen in Gewinnerzielungsabsicht geschieht (Neij und Sunde Kolmisoppi./. Schweden (Entsch.), Nr. 40397/12, 19. Februar 2013).
  • EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 3111/10

    Menschenrechtsgerichtshof verurteilt Türkei wegen Online-Zensur

    This is borne out not only by the words "conditions", "restrictions", "preventing" and "prevention" which appear in that provision, but also by the Court's judgment in The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (26 April 1979, Series A no. 30) and in markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany (20 November 1989, Series A no. 165).
  • EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 53495/09

    Meinungsfreiheit gilt auch für Werbung

    Die vorliegende Beschwerde verlangt eine Prüfung des angemessenen Gleichgewichts, das zwischen dem Recht des Beschwerdeführers auf Achtung seines Privatlebens unter dem Blickwinkel der dem Staat nach Artikel 8 der Konvention obliegenden positiven Pflichten und der Meinungsfreiheit der Gesellschaft nach Artikel 10 der Konvention herzustellen ist, der auch auf kommerzielle Meinungsäußerungen Anwendung findet (m. und B../. Deutschland, 20. November 1989, Rdnr. 26, Serie A Band 165), da er "jeder Person" die Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung zusichert, ohne danach zu unterscheiden, ob dies unter Umständen in Gewinnerzielungsabsicht geschieht (K../. Schweden (Entsch.), Nr. 40397/12, 19. Februar 2013).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht