Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOBOLEWSKI (No. 2) v. POLAND

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07
• EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 19847/07

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

  KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07

  Given that the requirements of paragraph 3 (c) represent specific aspects of the right to a fair hearing guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, the Court will examine the applicant's complaints in the light of the two texts taken in combination (see, among many other authorities, Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I, and Kamasinski v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, pp. 31-32, § 62).

  Nonetheless, the personal attendance of the defendant does not take on the same crucial significance for an appeal hearing as it does for the trial hearing (see Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 106, Series A no. 168).

• EGMR, 06.07.2004 - 50545/99

  DONDARINI c. SAINT-MARIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07

  Where an appellate court has to examine a case as to the facts and the law and make a full assessment of the issue of guilt or innocence, it cannot determine the issue without a direct assessment of the evidence given in person by the accused for the purpose of proving that he did not commit the act allegedly constituting a criminal offence (see Dondarini v. San Marino, no. 50545/99, § 27, 6 July 2004).
• EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 12631/87

  FEJDE c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07

  However, even where the court of appeal has jurisdiction to review the case both as to the facts and law, Article 6 does not always require a right to a public hearing, still less a right to appear in person (see Fejde v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-C, p. 68, § 31).

 
• EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

  POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07

  However, such a waiver must, if it is to be effective for Convention purposes, be established in an unequivocal manner and be attended by minimum safeguards commensurate with its importance (see Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 31, Series A no. 277-A).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 26103/95

  VAN GEYSEGHEM c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07

  Given that the requirements of paragraph 3 (c) represent specific aspects of the right to a fair hearing guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, the Court will examine the applicant's complaints in the light of the two texts taken in combination (see, among many other authorities, Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I, and Kamasinski v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, pp. 31-32, § 62).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9562/81

  MONNELL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07

  The Government referred to the Court's judgments in the cases Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom (2 March 1987, Series A no. 115) and Belziuk v. Poland (referred to above).
• EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

  Sutter ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 19847/07

  Proceedings involving only questions of law, as opposed to questions of fact, may comply with the requirements of Article 6, although the appellant was not given an opportunity of being heard in person by the appeal or cassation court, provided that a public hearing was held at first instance (see, among other authorities, Monnell and Morris, cited above, p. 22, § 58, as regards the issue of leave to appeal, and Sutter v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1984, Series A no. 74, p. 13, § 30, as regards the court of cassation).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 26.07.2017 - C-270/17

  Tupikas

  EGMR, 18. Oktober 2006, Hermi/Italien, CE:ECHR:2006:1018JUD001811402, § 62; 21. Juli 2009, Seliwiak/Polen, CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD000381804, §§ 54 bis 64; 9. Juni 2009, Sobolewski/Polen, CE:ECHR:2009:0609JUD001984707, §§ 33 bis 44; 9. Juni 2009, Strzalkowski/Polen, CE:ECHR:2009:0609JUD003150902, §§ 39 bis 55; 21. September 1993, Kremzow/Österreich, CE:ECHR:1993:0921JUD001235086, § 67; 26. Juli 2002, Meftah/Frankreich, CE:ECHR:2002:0726JUD003291196, § 41; 25. April 2013, Zahirovic/Kroatien, CE:ECHR:2013:0425JUD005859011, §§ 54 bis 57.