Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  USPASKICH v. LITHUANIA

  No violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  USPASKICH v. LITHUANIA

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99

  PODKOLZINA c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 14737/08

  Without the appropriate direct communication with voters, the electoral campaign had not been effective and his right to stand for elections had only been declarative and illusory (the applicant relied on Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 35, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 36503/11

  GAHRAMANLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 14737/08

  The Court considers that what is at stake in the present case is not the applicant's right to win the parliamentary election in the Dzukija single-member constituency, but his right to stand freely and effectively for it, this right being inherent in the concept of a truly democratic regime (see Gahramanli and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 36503/11, § 68, 8 October 2015).
• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 13716/02

  SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 14737/08

  The Lithuanian court had regard to the Court's case-law on the subject and emphasised that the right to stand for elections was not absolute (the Supreme Administrative Court referred to Sukhovetskyy v. Ukraine, no. 13716/02, §§ 50 and 51, ECHR 2006-VI).
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 18705/06

  NAMAT ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 14737/08

  The general principles regarding Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention have been set out in Namat Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 18705/06, §§ 70-73, 8 April 2010).

• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 14305/17

  Menschenrechtsgerichtshof fordert Freilassung von Selahattin Demirtas

  The Court reiterates that democracy constitutes a fundamental element of the "European public order", and that the rights guaranteed under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention are crucial to establishing and maintaining the foundations of an effective and meaningful democracy governed by the rule of law (see Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 141, 17 May 2016, and Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no. 14737/08, § 87, 20 December 2016).
• EuGH, 19.12.2019 - C-502/19

  Vorrechte und Befreiungen

  In dieser doppelten Hinsicht zielen die zugunsten der Mitglieder des Europäischen Parlaments vorgesehenen Immunitäten darauf ab, die Unabhängigkeit dieses Organs bei der Erfüllung seiner Aufgabe sicherzustellen, wie der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte in Bezug auf die verschiedenen Formen parlamentarischer Immunität, die in den demokratischen politischen Systemen eingeführt wurden, festgestellt hat (vgl. in diesem Sinne EGMR, 17. Mai 2016, Karácsony u. a./Ungarn, CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD004246113, § 138, und EGMR, 20. Dezember 2016, Uspaskich/Litauen, CE:ECHR:2016:1220JUD001473708, § 98).
• EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA

  The Government pointed out that in the case of Uspaskich v. Lithuania (no. 14737/08, §§ 44-49, 20 December 2016) the prosecutor had granted several requests lodged by the applicant, who had been under house arrest, to leave home to receive medical treatment.
• EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11

  ABDALOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court reiterates that the applicants were entitled, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, to stand for election in fair and democratic conditions, regardless of whether ultimately they won or lost (see Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no. 14737/08, §§ 88-92, 20 December 2016, § 88, with further references).