Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89, 8/1993/403/481   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1994,11040
EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89, 8/1993/403/481 (https://dejure.org/1994,11040)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.02.1994 - 15450/89, 8/1993/403/481 (https://dejure.org/1994,11040)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Februar 1994 - 15450/89, 8/1993/403/481 (https://dejure.org/1994,11040)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,11040) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

Papierfundstellen

  • ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0224JUD001545089
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (74)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

    MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    Article 10 (art. 10) does not apply solely to certain types of information or ideas or forms of expression (see the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 17, para. 26), in particular those of a political nature; it also encompasses artistic expression (see the Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 19, para. 27), information of a commercial nature (see the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment previously cited, ibid.) - as the Commission rightly pointed out - and even light music and commercials transmitted by cable (see the Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 173, p. 22, paras. 54-55).

    Under the Court's case-law, the States parties to the Convention have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing the necessity of an interference, but this margin is subject to European supervision as regards both the relevant rules and the decisions applying them (see, inter alia, the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment previously cited, Series A no. 165, p. 20, para. 33).

    Any such restrictions must, however, be closely scrutinised by the Court, which must weigh the requirements of those particular features against the advertising in question; to this end, the Court must look at the impugned penalty in the light of the case as a whole (see, mutatis mutandis, the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment previously cited, Series A no. 165, p. 20, para. 34).

  • EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79

    Barthold ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    In its Barthold v. Germany judgment of 25 March 1985 (Series A no. 90, pp. 20-21, para. 42) the Court left open the question whether commercial advertising as such came within the scope of the guarantees under Article 10 (art. 10), but its later case-law provides guidance on this matter.

    In the instant case, the Court's task is therefore confined to ascertaining whether the measures taken at national level are justifiable in principle and proportionate (see, inter alia, ibid. and the Barthold judgment previously cited, Series A no. 90, p. 25, para. 55).

  • EGMR, 25.06.1992 - 13778/88

    THORGEIR THORGEIRSON v. ICELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    2 (art. 10-2) and was "necessary in a democratic society" for the aforementioned aim (see, in particular, the Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 25, para. 56).

    It is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see, inter alia, the Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland judgment previously cited, Series A no. 239, p. 25, para. 58).

  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    In the case of the Bars, this status is further buttressed by their purpose of serving the public interest through the furtherance of free, adequate legal assistance combined with public supervision of the practice of the profession and of compliance with professional ethics (see, in the case of a Bar, the Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 15, para. 29 in fine, and the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, pp. 27-28, paras. 24-29; see also, mutatis mutandis, in the case of a medical association, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. 26-27, para. 64).
  • EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84

    MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    Article 10 (art. 10) does not apply solely to certain types of information or ideas or forms of expression (see the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 17, para. 26), in particular those of a political nature; it also encompasses artistic expression (see the Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 19, para. 27), information of a commercial nature (see the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment previously cited, ibid.) - as the Commission rightly pointed out - and even light music and commercials transmitted by cable (see the Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 173, p. 22, paras. 54-55).
  • EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 10890/84

    GROPPERA RADIO AG ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    Article 10 (art. 10) does not apply solely to certain types of information or ideas or forms of expression (see the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 17, para. 26), in particular those of a political nature; it also encompasses artistic expression (see the Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 19, para. 27), information of a commercial nature (see the markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment previously cited, ibid.) - as the Commission rightly pointed out - and even light music and commercials transmitted by cable (see the Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 173, p. 22, paras. 54-55).
  • EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 12726/87

    AUTRONIC AG v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    No distinction is made in it according to whether the type of aim pursued is profit-making or not (see, mutatis mutandis, the Autronic AG v. Switzerland judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 178, p. 23, para. 47) and a difference in treatment in this sphere might fall foul of Article 14 (art. 14).
  • EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85

    CASTELLS v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    In the light of the wording of the provisions in question (see, mutatis mutandis, the Castells v. Spain judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, p. 21, para. 37) and the state of its own case-law at the time, the Court finds this interpretation to be reasonable and likewise the Constitutional Court's interpretation of Article 20 of the Constitution in its decision of 17 April 1989 (see paragraphs 15 and 16 above).
  • EGMR, 30.11.1987 - 8950/80

    H. v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    In the case of the Bars, this status is further buttressed by their purpose of serving the public interest through the furtherance of free, adequate legal assistance combined with public supervision of the practice of the profession and of compliance with professional ethics (see, in the case of a Bar, the Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 15, para. 29 in fine, and the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, pp. 27-28, paras. 24-29; see also, mutatis mutandis, in the case of a medical association, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. 26-27, para. 64).
  • EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80

    VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
    In the case of the Bars, this status is further buttressed by their purpose of serving the public interest through the furtherance of free, adequate legal assistance combined with public supervision of the practice of the profession and of compliance with professional ethics (see, in the case of a Bar, the Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 15, para. 29 in fine, and the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, pp. 27-28, paras. 24-29; see also, mutatis mutandis, in the case of a medical association, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. 26-27, para. 64).
  • EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 12323/11

    MICHAUD v. FRANCE

    Quatrièmement, comme la Cour l'a souligné dans l'arrêt Casado Coca c. Espagne (24 février 1994, série A no 285-A), l'avocat joue un rôle clé pour assurer la confiance du public dans l'action des tribunaux ; il est donc primordial que la confiance du justiciable à son égard soit garantie, ce qui exige la préservation de son indépendance à l'égard des pouvoirs publics - mise en cause par le lien avec Tracfin établi par les dispositions litigieuses - et du secret professionnel.
  • EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90

    LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE

    The Court has consistently held that it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see, inter alia, the Casado Coca v. Spain judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 285-A, p. 18, para. 43).
  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 23.12.2015 - C-547/14

    Philip Morris Brands u.a. - Rechtsangleichung - Richtlinie 2014/40/EU -

    143 - EGMR, Urteile markt intern Verlag und Beermann/Deutschland (ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1120JUD001057283, Rn. 33) und Casado Coca/Spanien (ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0224JUD001545089, Rn. 50).

    144 - EGMR, Urteile Casado Coca/Spanien (ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0224JUD001545089, Rn. 51) und Stambuk/Deutschland (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1017JUD003792897, Rn. 39).

    146 - Im selben Sinne Urteil Deutsches Weintor (C-544/10, EU:C:2012:526, Rn. 52 und 53); zur Beschränkung sachlicher wahrheitsgetreuer Werbung vgl. außerdem auch EGMR, Urteile markt intern Verlag und Beermann/Deutschland (ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1120JUD001057283, Rn. 35), Casado Coca/Spanien (ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0224JUD001545089, Rn. 51) und Stambuk/Deutschland (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1017JUD003792897, Rn. 39).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht