Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SIGURÐUR A. SIGURJÓNSSON v. ICELAND

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SIGURÐUR A. SIGURJÓNSSON c. ISLANDE

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 11 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 9 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 10 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13 Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 10.07.1991 - 16130/90
• EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

Papierfundstellen

• Serie A Nr. 264

Wird zitiert von ... (31)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 20.04.1993 - 14327/88

  SIBSON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

  Such a form of compulsion, in the circumstances of the case, strikes at the very substance of the right guaranteed by Article 11 (art. 11) and itself amounts to an interference with that right (see the above-mentioned Young, James and Webster judgment, pp. 22-23, paras. 55 and 57, and the Sibson v. the United Kingdom judgment of 20 April 1993, Series A no. 258-A, p. 14, para. 29).
• EGMR, 13.08.1981 - 7601/76

  YOUNG, JAMES ET WEBSTER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

  2. Whether the right claimed by the applicant was covered by Article 11 (art. 11) 33. The Government, whilst accepting the view enunciated in the Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 August 1981 (Series A no. 44, pp. 21-22, para. 52) that the negative aspect of the right to freedom of association does not fall completely outside the ambit of Article 11 (art. 11), contested that it extended as far as encompassing a right for the applicant not to be a member of Frami.
• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

  He was thus subjected to a form of compulsion which, as already stated, is rare within the community of Contracting States and which, on the face of it, must be considered incompatible with Article 11 (art. 11) (see, mutatis mutandis, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 27, para. 65).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

  In this connection, it should be recalled that the Convention is a living instrument which must be interpreted in the light of present-day conditions (see, amongst other authorities, the Soering v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 40, para. 102).
• EGMR, 06.02.1976 - 5589/72

  SCHMIDT ET DAHLSTRÖM c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

  32. It is not necessary to decide whether Frami can also be regarded as a trade union within the meaning of Article 11 (art. 11), since the right to form and join trade unions in that provision is an aspect of the wider right to freedom of association, rather than a separate right (see, amongst other authorities, the Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden judgment of 6 February 1976, Series A no. 21, p. 15, para. 34).

• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  While, for example, in the context of Article 11 of the Convention, the freedom of association was found to involve not only a right to join an association but a corresponding right not to be forced to join an association, the Court observes that the notion of a freedom implies some measure of choice as to its exercise (see the Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44, § 52, and Sigurdur A. Sigurjónsson v. Island judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, pp. 15-16, § 35).
• EGMR, 12.11.2008 - 34503/97

  Demir und Baykara ./. Türkei - Streikrecht für Beamte

  By way of example, in finding that the right to organise had a negative aspect which excluded closed-shop agreements, the Court considered, largely on the basis of the European Social Charter and the case-law of its supervisory organs, together with other European or universal instruments, that there was a growing measure of agreement on the subject at international level (see Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland, 30 June 1993, § 35, Series A no. 264; and Sørensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark [GC], nos. 52562/99 and 52620/99, §§ 72-75, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11

  MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY

  It can be seen from the case-law that the travaux préparatoires are not delimiting for the question whether a right may be considered to fall within the scope of an Article of the Convention if the existence of such a right was supported by the growing measure of common ground that had emerged in the given area (see, for example Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland, 30 June 1993, § 35, Series A no. 264).

  In this sense, Article 10 § 1 is different from the first paragraphs of Articles 8, 9 and 11 of the Convention, the latter being textually framed in such a way as to allow the Court more flexibility in recognising positive obligations and identifying novel rights than is possible under Article 10. It follows that the example given by the majority in this context in support of its findings, that is, the recognition of a negative right to freedom of association under Article 11 of the Convention, as found in the case of Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (30 June 1993, § 35, Series A no. 264), is quite inapposite (see paragraph 125 of the judgment).

 
• EuGH, 09.03.2006 - C-499/04

  Werhof - Unternehmensübergang - Richtlinie 77/187/EWG - Wahrung der Ansprüche der …

  33 Die Vereinigungsfreiheit, die auch das Recht umfasst, einer Gewerkschaft nicht beizutreten (vgl. in diesem Sinne Urteile des Europäischen Gerichtshofes für Menschenrechte Sigurjónsson/Island vom 30. Juni 1993, Serie A Nr. 264, § 35, und Gustafsson/Schweden vom 25. April 1996, Reports of Judgements and Decisions 1996-II, 637, § 45), ist in Artikel 11 der am 4. November 1950 in Rom unterzeichneten Europäischen Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten verankert und gehört zu den Grundrechten, die nach ständiger Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofes in der Gemeinschaftsrechtsordnung geschützt werden (vgl. Urteil vom 15. Dezember 1995 in der Rechtssache C-415/93, Bosman, Slg. 1995, I-4921, Randnr. 79), worauf Artikel 6 Absatz 2 EU hinweist (Urteil vom 6. März 2001 in der Rechtssache C-274/99 P, Connolly/Kommission, Slg. 2001, I-1611).
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

  CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  The Court shares that opinion and will accordingly consider the complaint under Article 11 in the light of Article 9, since protection of personal opinions is one of the purposes of the freedom of association, which implies a negative freedom of association (see the Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, p. 17, § 37).
• EGMR, 25.04.1996 - 15573/89

  GUSTAFSSON v. SWEDEN

  Unlike the applicants in previous cases where the Court had recognised a negative right to freedom of association (see the Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44, pp. 21-22, paras. 55-58; and the Sigurdur A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, pp. 15-16, para. 35), the applicant in the present case had not been compelled to join an association.

  The interests protected by Article 11 (art. 11) As the judgment points out (at paragraph 45), Article 11 (art. 11) has been interpreted to encompass also the negative aspect of freedom of association, namely the right not to join an association (see Sigurdur A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, pp. 15-16, para. 35).

  Consequently, it becomes necessary in the present case to determine the question left open in the Sigurdur A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland judgment (30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, p. 16, para. 35).

  In spite of a certain reluctance to "open the door" to the negative freedom of association (paragraph 45, sub-paragraph 2) the Court, following the Sigurdur A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland judgment of 30 June 1993 (Series A no. 264, pp. 15-16, para. 35), has interpreted this Article (art. 11) in its logical sense that this negative right of association - the right not to join or to withdraw from a trade union - is only one aspect of the freedom of association with others.

• EGMR, 11.01.2006 - 52562/99

  SØRENSEN ET RASMUSSEN c. DANEMARK

  Accordingly, Article 11 must also be viewed as encompassing a negative right of association or, put in other words, a right not to be forced to join an association (see Sigurdur Sigurjónsson v. Iceland judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, § 35).

  That a negative right of association is protected by Article 11, at least to some extent, has been confirmed in the Court's subsequent case-law, but as the majority rightly stressed, the Court has hitherto not taken any definite stand on whether the negative and positive aspects of the right to freedom of association should be afforded the same level of protection (see, in particular, Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, § 35)).

• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 23646/09

  Keine Verletzung von Art. 11 EMRK (Recht auf Versammlungsfreiheit)

  Der Gerichtshof weist erneut darauf hin, dass die Vereinigungsfreiheit ein gewisses Maß an Wahlfreiheit hinsichtlich ihrer Wahrnehmung impliziert und sowohl das positive Recht, eine Vereinigung zu gründen und einer Vereinigung beizutreten, als auch das negative Recht, nicht zum Beitritt zu einer Vereinigung gezwungen zu werden, beinhaltet (Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson ./. Island, 30. Juni 1993, Rdnr. 35, Serie A Band 264;… Vörður Ólafsson ./. Island, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 20161/06, Rdnr. 45, ECHR 2010).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 23.05.2007 - C-341/05

  NACH AUFFASSUNG VON GENERALANWALT MENGOZZI KÖNNEN GEWERKSCHAFTEN DURCH KOLLEKTIVE …

  22 - Vgl. Urteile des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte vom 30. Juni 1993, Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson/Island (Serie A, Nr. 264, § 35), vom 25. April 1996, Gustafsson/Schweden (Rep. 1996-II, S. 637, § 45), und vom 11. Januar 2006, Sørensen und Rasmussen/Dänemark (noch nicht veröffentlicht, § 54).
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06

  VÖRDUR ÓLAFSSON c. ISLANDE

  In the Government's opinion, there was a fundamental difference between the situation at issue in the present case and that in previous judgments by the Court concerning the negative aspects of the freedom of association, notably Young, James and Webster, cited above; Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (30 June 1993, Series A no. 264); and Sørensen and Rasmussen, cited above.
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 15.11.2005 - C-499/04

  Werhof - Übergang von Unternehmen - Wahrung der Ansprüche der Arbeitnehmer - …
• EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 43311/98

  KÖLL v. AUSTRIA
• VG Düsseldorf, 21.11.2007 - 20 K 6268/06

  Dem Grunde nach bestehende Gewerbesteuerpflicht als Voraussetzung für die …
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 41561/07

  THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN - PIRIN AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 14.09.1999 - 32441/96

  KARAKURT v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 11002/05

  ASSOCIATED SOCIETY OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND FIREMEN (ASLEF) c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 08.09.2005 - 71477/01

  N. A. und I. F. gegen Deutschland
• EGMR, 20.03.2003 - 52620/99

  JENSEN and RASMUSSEN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 20.03.2003 - 52562/99

  SØRENSEN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 20006/08

  ÜSTÜNER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06

  Olafsson ./. Island
• EGMR, 12.12.2002 - 56400/00

  CESNIEKS contre la LETTONIE
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 13459/11

  DERIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 57045/00

  ZHECHEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99

  POPOV and OTHERS, VAKARELOVA, MARKOV and BANKOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 12.04.2001 - 35771/97

  THORKELSSON v. ICELAND
• EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32721/96

  M.A. v. SWEDEN
• EKMR, 08.04.1994 - 15533/89

  ENGLUND AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 60781/00

  SLAVIC UNIVERSITY IN BULGARIA and OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 36401/97

  KAJANEN AND TUOMAALA v. FINLAND
• EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 21386/93

  NATIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (NALGO) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM