Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
W. c. SUISSE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
Non-violation de l'Art. 5-3 (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
W. v. SWITZERLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
No violation of Art. 5-3 (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 09.10.1990 - 14379/88
- EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
Papierfundstellen
- Serie A Nr. 254-A
Wird zitiert von ... (160)
- EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06
Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair
However, the "reasonable time" cannot be assessed in abstracto: "continued detention can be justified... only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest,... which outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty" (see W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, § 30). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
La poursuite de l'incarcération ne se justifie, dans une espèce donnée, que si des indices concrets révèlent une véritable exigence d'intérêt public prévalant, nonobstant la présomption d'innocence, sur la règle du respect de la liberté individuelle (voir, entre autres, l'arrêt W. c. Suisse du 26 janvier 1993, série A n° 254-A, p. 15, § 30). - EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 65655/01
Menschenrechte: Überlange Untersuchungshaft, "La Belle"
Im konkreten Fall kann die Fortdauer der Haft nur dann gerechtfertigt sein, wenn es konkrete Anhaltspunkte dafür gibt, dass sie im öffentlichen Interesse wirklich erforderlich ist, und dieses öffentliche Interesse, ungeachtet der Unschuldsvermutung, den Grundsatz der Achtung der Freiheit der Person überwiegt (siehe W. ./. Schweiz , Urteil vom 26. Januar 1993, Serie A Band 254-A, S. 15, Randnr. 30;… Labita , a. a. O., Randnr. 152).
- EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 14305/17
Menschenrechtsgerichtshof fordert Freilassung von Selahattin Demirtas
As regards the risk of flight, the Court has held that it must be assessed with reference to a number of other factors, such as the accused's character, morals, assets, links with the jurisdiction, and international contacts (see W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 33 Series A no. 254-A; Smirnova, cited above, § 60; and Buzadji, cited above, § 90). - EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 15217/07
ALEKSANDR MAKAROV v. RUSSIA
Continued detention can be justified only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see, among other authorities, W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI).However, with the passage of time the mere availability of the information, without any evidence to support its veracity, inevitably became less and less relevant, particularly so when the applicant persistently disputed his ability to abscond, alleging that no property had been sold or foreign currency bought and referring to his age, poor health, lack of a valid passport for travel or medical insurance and the fact that he had no relatives and did not own property outside the Tomsk Region to confirm that there was no danger of his absconding (see, by contrast, W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 33, Series A no. 254-A).
They should have analysed other pertinent factors, such as the advancement of the investigation or judicial proceedings, the applicant's personality, his behaviour before and after the arrest and any other specific indications justifying the fear that he might abuse his regained liberty by carrying out acts aimed at falsification or destruction of evidence or manipulation of witnesses (see W., cited above, § 36, Series A no. 254-A).
- EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 49746/99
Übermäßig lange Dauer der Untersuchungshaft und Verstoß gegen den …
Im konkreten Fall kann die Fortdauer der Haft nur dann gerechtfertigt sein, wenn es bestimmte Anhaltspunkte dafür gibt, dass sie im öffentlichen Interesse wirklich erforderlich ist, und dieses öffentliche Interesse, ungeachtet der Unschuldsvermutung, stärker als der Grundsatz der Achtung der Freiheit der Person zu gewichten ist (siehe u. a. W. ./. Schweiz, Urteil vom 26. Januar 1993, Serie A Band 254-A, S. 15, Nr. 30; Labita ./. Italien [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 26772/95, Nr. 152, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
In this context regard must be had in particular to the character of the person involved, his morals, his assets, his links with the State in which he is being prosecuted and his international contacts (see W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, § 33 with further references). - EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09
Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte
However, with the passage of time the mere availability of that information inevitably became less and less relevant, particularly when the first applicant persistently disputed his ability to abscond, alleging that there was no record of his application for a United Kingdom entry visa and referring to his poor health and family situation to confirm that there was no danger of his absconding (see, by contrast, W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 33, Series A no. 254-A).They should have analysed other pertinent factors, such as the advancement of the investigation or judicial proceedings, the first applicant's personality, his behaviour after the arrest and any other specific indications justifying the fear that he might abuse his regained liberty by carrying out acts aimed at the falsification or destruction of evidence or the manipulation of witnesses (see W. v. Switzerland, cited above, § 36, Series A no. 254-A).
- EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 62936/00
MOISEYEV v. RUSSIA
Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see, among other authorities, W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30, and Kudla, cited above, § 110). - OLG Karlsruhe, 04.10.2021 - Ausl 301 AR 86/21 Mit Erlass des Eröffnungsbeschlusses am 17.06.2021 wurde der Verfolgte vielmehr unter verschiedenen Auflagen, trotz der nunmehr Ende November 2021 anstehenden Hauptverhandlung, "provisorisch" aus der Untersuchungshaft entlassen, offensichtlich, um die Rechte des Verfolgten aus § 5 Abs. 3 EMRK zu wahren und keinen schadensersatzpflichtigen Konventionsverstoß (wegen der Verletzung des Beschleunigungsgebots) zu begehen (vgl. EGMR , Urteil vom 6.11.2014 - 67522/09 - Ereren/Deutschland = NJW 2015, 3773 ; EGMR , Urteil vom 29.07.2004 - 49746/99 Cevizovic/Deutschland = NJW 2005, 3125 ; EGMR , 1993, Serie A, Bd. 254 Nr. 30 = ÖJZ 1993, 562 - W./Schweiz; EGMR , Slg. 2000-IV Nr. 152 - Labita/Italien; EGMR , Slg. 2006-XII Nr. 35 - Chraidi/Deutschland; EGMR , Urteil vom 26.4.2011 - 59301/08 Nr. 49 - Tinner/Schweiz; BVerfGE 75, 1ff und Beschluss vom 17.02.2009, 2 BvR 257/09; Senat, NStZ 2005, 351 und StraFo 2007, 477 ; OLG Hamm, Beschluss vom 28.12.2007 in StV 2008, 648 und OLG Hamm, Beschluss vom 10.09.2013 - III-2 Ausl 95/11 -, juris).
- EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 20756/04
ISAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05
MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 65745/01
Beschleunigungsgrundsatz im Haftverfahren (doppelte Strafmilderung bei Verletzung …
- EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13
MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 23755/07
BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
SARDINAS ALBO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 633/03
DUDEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 43808/07
LUKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 5453/08
YURIY YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 11287/03
LELIEVRE c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 08.08.2006 - 23042/02
CABALA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 57541/09
VALERIY SAMOYLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.12.2008 - 46468/06
ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.08.2006 - 3489/03
CEGLOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.07.2006 - 77832/01
DZYRUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04
CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 8014/07
FRUNI v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02
ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04
BAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 23691/06
SHTEYN (STEIN) v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2005 - 75112/01
CZARNECKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 61767/08
PYATKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 48977/09
ARUTYUNYAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 20197/03
MIMINOSHVILI v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33619/04
SOKURENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 57180/09
BERNOBIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 2052/08
KOKOSHKINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 38623/03
PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 46793/06
BULDASHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 78146/01
VLASOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 38971/06
KORSHUNOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 46082/99
KLYAKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2004 - 4493/04
LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2002 - 57861/00
ABSANDZE contre la GEORGIE
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 22386/04
CONTOLORU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33682/05
KAROLY v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 41545/06
SEGEDA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 20824/09
PERICA OREB v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2013 - 52624/10
HAGYÓ v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 57319/10
SOPIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 1600/09
KOROLEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 28018/05
STRELETS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 36653/09
TRIFKOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 67341/10
DERVISHI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 24202/05
VELIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.05.2008 - 67542/01
GUSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 3947/03
SILIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 42940/06
GOVORUSHKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 24552/02
MELNIKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.02.2007 - 15067/02
CZAJKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.08.2006 - 49048/99
HUSEYIN ESEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 38415/13
NENAD KOVACEVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 75068/12
DRAGIN v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2014 - 14945/03
ARTEMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 56111/12
ORBAN v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 68435/10
HUNVALD v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 28020/05
YEVGENIY GUSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 45373/05
SHIKUTA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 46108/11
MKHITARYAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 33123/08
SIZOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.03.2010 - 30930/02
SAVENKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 2737/04
AVDEYEV AND VERYAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 20817/04
NART v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.02.2008 - 18123/04
MATSKUS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 16308/02
PECHEUR c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 32849/04
MUCHA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99
MEHMET YAVUZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 40991/98
KEMAL KOÇAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 34333/02
BORGMANN v. GERMANY
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 2708/02
VLADIMIR SOLOVYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 7328/03
KAPAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 10816/02
KOZIMOR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 67016/01
DUDA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 75107/01
DOMBEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 13425/02
MICHTA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 40159/98
TEMEL ET TASKIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 75274/01
CALLEJA v. MALTA
- EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 34221/96
D.P. v. POLAND
- EKMR, 29.06.1994 - 20602/92
SZÜCS v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 26211/13
SOS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 48982/08
YURIY RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 16115/13
MARGARETIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11
GÁL v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 14807/08
MIKHAIL GRISHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 2366/07
SUSLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 33762/05
ERIMESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 7983/06
SZEPESI v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 16854/03
TSARKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 20315/04
WIERZBA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 13167/02
RYDZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39742/05
PIOTR BARANOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 19177/03
SCHMALZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.07.2007 - 29437/02
LEWANDOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 29798/02
MORKUNAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 33198/04
RUCINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 19583/05
RYCKIE v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.01.2007 - 26186/02
HESSE v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 38872/03
BOGDANOWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 26876/03
TRZNADEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 37766/02
PIOTR KUC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 6334/02
DOLASINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 62324/00
DEPA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 64284/01
OLEKSY v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 26918/02
TRZCIALKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 18368/02
BUTA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 5270/04
DRABEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 6356/04
PASINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 42554/98
TEKIN ET BALTAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 66004/01
VAIVADA v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 24552/02
MELNIKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.10.2003 - 38654/97
GORAL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.01.2003 - 39324/98
DEMIREL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.04.2002 - 35489/97
SALAPA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 60268/00
UZEYIR contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 24244/94
MIGON v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.02.2001 - 33079/96
SZELOCH v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.09.2000 - 34447/97
SZOFER v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 34994/97
WALTER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2000 - 35207/97
AGGIATO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 24.08.1998 - 27143/95
CONTRADA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 19382/92
VAN DER TANG c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
ALEKSANDR NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 16986/10
ÇELIK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 60468/08
ROSSI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 32420/03
MURAT KAÇAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.04.2007 - 37326/04
TERESZCZENKO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 15141/03
CZERBINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97
MATWIEJCZUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.11.2001 - 34052/96
OLSTOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 38764/97
OUAJIL contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 35848/97
BARFUSS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 39615/99
MOTIERE contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 12.10.1999 - 37073/97
RICHARD contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.07.1999 - 42296/98
LOWRY v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 20.04.1999 - 35220/97
BOICHINOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 30.03.1999 - 37369/97
BOUT contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 23.03.1999 - 34033/96
DAUGY contre la FRANCE
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28155/95
KUMAR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20231/92
W.S. v. SWITZERLAND
- EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 37311/08
ROMAN PETROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 7390/07
KEVIN O'DOWD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 2563/06
SHENOYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 39840/05
PAWLAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 43748/98
WIENSZTAL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 76024/01
RAPACCIUOLO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 28.03.2002 - 25415/94
KLAMECKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.11.2000 - 41852/98
VACCARO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 17.03.1997 - 21802/93
MULLER v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 37912/04
ÇAYAN BILGIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.04.2001 - 39765/98
WARIDEL contre la SUISSE