Weitere Entscheidung unten: EuG, 20.10.2008

Rechtsprechung
   EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07, T-245/07, T-246/07, T-252/07, T-253/07, T-254/07, T-255/07, T-258/07, T-259/07, T-260/07, T-268/07, T-269/07, T-270/07, T-271/07, T-272/07, T-394/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,37084
EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07, T-245/07, T-246/07, T-252/07, T-253/07, T-254/07, T-255/07, T-258/07, T-259/07, T-260/07, T-268/07, T-269/07, T-270/07, T-271/07, T-272/07, T-394/07 (https://dejure.org/2008,37084)
EuG, Entscheidung vom 20.10.2008 - T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07, T-245/07, T-246/07, T-252/07, T-253/07, T-254/07, T-255/07, T-258/07, T-259/07, T-260/07, T-268/07, T-269/07, T-270/07, T-271/07, T-272/07, T-394/07 (https://dejure.org/2008,37084)
EuG, Entscheidung vom 20. Oktober 2008 - T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07, T-245/07, T-246/07, T-252/07, T-253/07, T-254/07, T-255/07, T-258/07, T-259/07, T-260/07, T-268/07, T-269/07, T-270/07, T-271/07, T-272/07, T-394/07 (https://dejure.org/2008,37084)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,37084) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (11)

Sonstiges (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof (Verfahrensmitteilung)

    Klage, eingereicht am 26. Juni 2007 - Las Palmeras / Rat und Kommission

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof (Verfahrensdokumentation)

    Las Palmeras / Rat und Kommission

    Klage auf Ersatz des Schadens, den die Klägerin infolge des Erlasses und der Anwendung des durch Art. 1 Nr. 20 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 864/2004 des Rates vom 29. April 2004 (ABl. L 161, S. 48) eingeführten und durch das Urteil des Gerichtshofs vom 7. September 2006 in ...

  • EU-Kommission (Verfahrensmitteilung)

    Klage

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (19)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,81933
EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07 (https://dejure.org/2008,81933)
EuG, Entscheidung vom 20.10.2008 - T-260/07 (https://dejure.org/2008,81933)
EuG, Entscheidung vom 20. Oktober 2008 - T-260/07 (https://dejure.org/2008,81933)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,81933) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EuGH, 20.05.2003 - C-465/00

    DIE WEITERGABE VON EINKOMMENSDATEN VON ARBEITNEHMERN ÖFFENTLICHER EINRICHTUNGEN …

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    That being so, it cannot be accepted that the processing of personal data carried out for the purposes of the operation of the search engine should escape the obligations and guarantees laid down by Directive 95/46, which would compromise the directive's effectiveness and the effective and complete protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons which the directive seeks to ensure (see, by analogy, L'Oréal and Others EU:C:2011:474, paragraphs 62 and 63), in particular their right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data, a right to which the directive accords special importance as is confirmed in particular by Article 1(1) thereof and recitals 2 and 10 in its preamble (see, to this effect, Joined Cases C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01 Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 70; Case C-553/07 Rijkeboer EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 47; and Case C-473/12 IPI EU:C:2013:715, paragraph 28 and the case-law cited).

    The Court has already held that the provisions of Directive 95/46, in so far as they govern the processing of personal data liable to infringe fundamental freedoms, in particular the right to privacy, must necessarily be interpreted in the light of fundamental rights, which, according to settled case-law, form an integral part of the general principles of law whose observance the Court ensures and which are now set out in the Charter (see, in particular, Case C-274/99 P Connolly v Commission EU:C:2001:127, paragraph 37, and Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 68).

    In this connection, it should be noted that, subject to the exceptions permitted under Article 13 of Directive 95/46, all processing of personal data must comply, first, with the principles relating to data quality set out in Article 6 of the directive and, secondly, with one of the criteria for making data processing legitimate listed in Article 7 of the directive (see Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 65; Joined Cases C-468/10 and C-469/10 ASNEF and FECEMD EU:C:2011:777, paragraph 26; and Case C-342/12 Worten EU:C:2013:355, paragraph 33).

  • EuGH, 24.11.2011 - C-468/10

    ASNEF - Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten - Richtlinie 95/46/EG - Art. 7 …

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    In this connection, it should be noted that, subject to the exceptions permitted under Article 13 of Directive 95/46, all processing of personal data must comply, first, with the principles relating to data quality set out in Article 6 of the directive and, secondly, with one of the criteria for making data processing legitimate listed in Article 7 of the directive (see Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 65; Joined Cases C-468/10 and C-469/10 ASNEF and FECEMD EU:C:2011:777, paragraph 26; and Case C-342/12 Worten EU:C:2013:355, paragraph 33).

    Application of Article 7(f) thus necessitates a balancing of the opposing rights and interests concerned, in the context of which account must be taken of the significance of the data subject's rights arising from Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter (see ASNEF and FECEMD , EU:C:2011:777, paragraphs 38 and 40).

  • EuGH, 07.11.2013 - C-473/12

    IPI - Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten - Richtlinie 95/46/EG - Art. 10 und 11 …

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    That being so, it cannot be accepted that the processing of personal data carried out for the purposes of the operation of the search engine should escape the obligations and guarantees laid down by Directive 95/46, which would compromise the directive's effectiveness and the effective and complete protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons which the directive seeks to ensure (see, by analogy, L'Oréal and Others EU:C:2011:474, paragraphs 62 and 63), in particular their right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data, a right to which the directive accords special importance as is confirmed in particular by Article 1(1) thereof and recitals 2 and 10 in its preamble (see, to this effect, Joined Cases C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01 Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 70; Case C-553/07 Rijkeboer EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 47; and Case C-473/12 IPI EU:C:2013:715, paragraph 28 and the case-law cited).

    First of all, it should be remembered that, as is apparent from Article 1 and recital 10 in the preamble, Directive 95/46 seeks to ensure a high level of protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, in particular their right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data (see, to this effect, IPI EU:C:2013:715, paragraph 28).

     
  • EuGH, 12.07.2011 - C-324/09

    Verantwortlichkeit des Betreibers eines Online-Marktplatzes für …

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    Furthermore, in the light of the objective of Directive 95/46 of ensuring effective and complete protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, and in particular their right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data, those words cannot be interpreted restrictively (see, by analogy, Case C-324/09 L'Oréal and Others EU:C:2011:474, paragraphs 62 and 63).

    That being so, it cannot be accepted that the processing of personal data carried out for the purposes of the operation of the search engine should escape the obligations and guarantees laid down by Directive 95/46, which would compromise the directive's effectiveness and the effective and complete protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons which the directive seeks to ensure (see, by analogy, L'Oréal and Others EU:C:2011:474, paragraphs 62 and 63), in particular their right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data, a right to which the directive accords special importance as is confirmed in particular by Article 1(1) thereof and recitals 2 and 10 in its preamble (see, to this effect, Joined Cases C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01 Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 70; Case C-553/07 Rijkeboer EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 47; and Case C-473/12 IPI EU:C:2013:715, paragraph 28 and the case-law cited).

  • EuGH, 25.10.2011 - C-509/09

    Die Opfer mittels des Internets begangener Persönlichkeitsverletzungen können …

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    Furthermore, the effect of the interference with those rights of the data subject is heightened on account of the important role played by the internet and search engines in modern society, which render the information contained in such a list of results ubiquitous (see, to this effect, Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising and Others EU:C:2011:685, paragraph 45).
  • EuGH, 29.10.2010 - C-161/10

    Martinez und Martinez - Verbindung

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    Furthermore, the effect of the interference with those rights of the data subject is heightened on account of the important role played by the internet and search engines in modern society, which render the information contained in such a list of results ubiquitous (see, to this effect, Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising and Others EU:C:2011:685, paragraph 45).
  • EuGH, 07.05.2009 - C-553/07

    Rijkeboer - Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener …

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    That being so, it cannot be accepted that the processing of personal data carried out for the purposes of the operation of the search engine should escape the obligations and guarantees laid down by Directive 95/46, which would compromise the directive's effectiveness and the effective and complete protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons which the directive seeks to ensure (see, by analogy, L'Oréal and Others EU:C:2011:474, paragraphs 62 and 63), in particular their right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data, a right to which the directive accords special importance as is confirmed in particular by Article 1(1) thereof and recitals 2 and 10 in its preamble (see, to this effect, Joined Cases C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01 Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 70; Case C-553/07 Rijkeboer EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 47; and Case C-473/12 IPI EU:C:2013:715, paragraph 28 and the case-law cited).
  • EuGH, 30.05.2013 - C-342/12

    Worten

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    In this connection, it should be noted that, subject to the exceptions permitted under Article 13 of Directive 95/46, all processing of personal data must comply, first, with the principles relating to data quality set out in Article 6 of the directive and, secondly, with one of the criteria for making data processing legitimate listed in Article 7 of the directive (see Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others EU:C:2003:294, paragraph 65; Joined Cases C-468/10 and C-469/10 ASNEF and FECEMD EU:C:2011:777, paragraph 26; and Case C-342/12 Worten EU:C:2013:355, paragraph 33).
  • EuGH, 06.11.2003 - C-101/01

    Bodil Lindqvist - Verwendung personenbezogener Daten im Internet

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    As regards in particular the internet, the Court has already had occasion to state that the operation of loading personal data on an internet page must be considered to be such "processing' within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46 (see Case C-101/01 Lindqvist EU:C:2003:596, paragraph 25).
  • EuGH, 16.12.2008 - C-73/07

    Der Gerichtshof präzisiert das Verhältnis zwischen Datenschutz und Pressefreiheit

    Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2008 - T-260/07
    It has indeed observed in that regard that a general derogation from the application of Directive 95/46 in such a case would largely deprive the directive of its effect (see, to this effect, Case C-73/07 Satakunnan Markkinapörssi and Satamedia EU:C:2008:727, paragraphs 48 and 49).
  • EuGH, 06.03.2001 - C-274/99

    Connolly / Kommission

  • EuG, 15.08.2009 - T-252/07

    Außervertragliche Haftung - Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik - Änderung der …

          Mit Klageschriften, die bei der Kanzlei des Gerichts am 26. Juni und am 25. Oktober 2007 eingegangen sind (Rechtssachen T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07 bis T-246/07, T-252/07 bis T-255/07, T-258/07 bis T-260/07, T-268/07 bis T-272/07 und T-394/07), haben 18 Baumwoll- Entkörnungsunternehmen, darunter die Klägerinnen, Klagen auf Ersatz des Schadens erhoben, den sie im Wirtschaftsjahr 2006/07 durch den Erlass und die Anwendung der streitigen Vorschriften erlitten zu haben behaupten.

          Die Klägerinnen in den Rechtssachen T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07 bis T-246/07, T-253/07 bis T-255/07, T-258/07 bis T-260/07, T-268/07 bis T-270/07 und T-394/07 haben mit Schriftsatz, der am 18. Juli 2008 bei der Kanzlei des Gerichts eingegangen ist, dem Gericht mitgeteilt, dass sie ihre Klage zurückziehen.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht