Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DIGAY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 16.01.2020 - 34645/17

  DIGAY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  The Court notes that the same complaints have already been examined by it in application no. 34645/17 (see Digay and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 34645/17 and 8 others, 16 January 2020) and in application no. 50771/16 (see Perekrestov and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 18467/16 and 5 others, 9 November 2017).

  34645/17 and 50771/16 and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4.

• EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 22/08

  SKERDA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  22/08/2017 to.
• KAG Mainz, 24.04.2008 - M 21/07

  Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  21/07/2018.

 
• KAG Münster, 12.07.2010 - 28/09

  Einführung einer Verteilung der Dienstzeiten auf 5,5 Tage-Woche; Verstoß gegen §§ …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  28/09/2018.
• RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05

  Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  20/05/2018.
• VerfGH Berlin, 20.12.2011 - VerfGH 28/11

  Verfassungsbeschwerde: Verletzung des Anspruchs auf effektiven Rechtsschutz iSv …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  29/11/2017.
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13

  KHLOYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  There is nothing in the material submitted to the Court to show any significant period of inactivity on the part of the prosecution or the courts dealing with the matter (see, for similar reasoning, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, §§ 102-10, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, §§ 38-48, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, §§ 153-56, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 20756/04

  ISAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  There is nothing in the material submitted to the Court to show any significant period of inactivity on the part of the prosecution or the courts dealing with the matter (see, for similar reasoning, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, §§ 102-10, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, §§ 38-48, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, §§ 153-56, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 78774/13

  TOPEKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  There is nothing in the material submitted to the Court to show any significant period of inactivity on the part of the prosecution or the courts dealing with the matter (see, for similar reasoning, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, §§ 102-10, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, §§ 38-48, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, §§ 153-56, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 57319/10

  SOPIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

  There is nothing in the material submitted to the Court to show any significant period of inactivity on the part of the prosecution or the courts dealing with the matter (see, for similar reasoning, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, §§ 102-10, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, §§ 38-48, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, §§ 153-56, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 18467/16

  PEREKRESTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 2091/11

  ELKSNIT AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA