Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 24745/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GHETTI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 24745/03
Alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the Convention 30. The Court refers to its established case-law on the structure of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and the three rules contained therein (see, amongst many other authorities, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden (23 September 1982, § 61, Series A no. 52).The Court finds it natural that, in an area as complex and difficult as that of urban planning, the Contracting States should enjoy a wide margin of appreciation in order to implement their policies in that regard (see and Elia S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 37710/97, § 77, ECHR 2001-IX 77, and, mutatis mutandis, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 69, Series A no. 52).
- EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79
BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 24745/03
Furthermore, the notion of "public interest" is necessarily extensive (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98).The Court further reiterates that while a deprivation of property effected for no reason other than to confer a private benefit on a private party cannot be "in the public interest", the compulsory transfer of property from one individual to another may, depending on the circumstances, constitute a legitimate means of promoting the public interest (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 40, Series A no. 98).