Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55989) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AYANGIL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of P1-1 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Ayangil and Others v. Turkey
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 33294/03
- EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 33294/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
Nonetheless, even in the absence of a formal expropriation, that is to say, a transfer of ownership, the Court must look behind appearances and investigate the realities of the situation complained of (Sporrong and Lönnroth, cited above, § 36, and Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, 24 June 1982, § 38, Series A no. 50; see also Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
The applicants" right of property thus became precarious and defeasible over a long period of time (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 60, Series A no. 52). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
It must then examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected of him or her to exhaust domestic remedies (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 59, ECHR 2000-VII).
- EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77
VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
Nonetheless, even in the absence of a formal expropriation, that is to say, a transfer of ownership, the Court must look behind appearances and investigate the realities of the situation complained of (Sporrong and Lönnroth, cited above, § 36, and Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, 24 June 1982, § 38, Series A no. 50; see also Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
The burden of proof is on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that an effective remedy was available in theory and in practice at the relevant time; that is to say, that the remedy was accessible, was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 29787/03
RIAD ET IDIAB c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
It should also be reiterated that an applicant must have made normal use of domestic remedies which are likely to be effective and sufficient and that, when a remedy has been pursued, use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 84, ECHR 2008-... (extracts)).