Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 33431/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,68727) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABACI v. TURKEY
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 08.04.2008 - 21878/06
Uganda, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Europäischer Gerichtshof für …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 33431/02
In addition, it is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Nnyanzi v. the United Kingdom, no. 21878/06, § 42, 8 April 2008).
- EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 19467/07
KARAKUS v. TURKEY
The Court notes that it has already declared admissible similar complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, in particular, Abacı v. Turkey, no. 33431/02, §§ 11-18, 7 October 2008, and Turgut and Others v. Turkey, no. 1411/03, § 80, 8 July 2008) and has found violations in respect of the annulment of title acquired in good faith but later restored to State ownership without compensation being paid (see N.A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 37451/97, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2005-X). - EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 9738/06
MUSTAFA KOÇER v. TURKEY
The Court notes that it has already declared admissible similar cases (see, in particular, Abacı v. Turkey, no. 33431/02, §§ 11-18, 7 October 2008, and Turgut and Others v. Turkey, no. 1411/03, § 80, 8 July 2008) and has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of the annulment of title acquired in good faith but later restored to State ownership without compensation being paid (see N.A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 37451/97, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2005-X). - EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 41220/07
KALYONCU v. TURKEY
The Court notes that it has already declared admissible similar cases (see, in particular, Abacı v. Turkey, no. 33431/02, §§ 11-18, 7 October 2008, and Turgut and Others v. Turkey, no. 1411/03, § 80, 8 July 2008) and has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of the annulment of title acquired in good faith but later restored to State ownership without compensation being paid (see N.A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 37451/97, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2005-X).