Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 22289/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,37147) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BEREZOVSKIYE v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 22289/08
That right of access is not absolute and it is subject to limitations, which, however, must not restrict or reduce a person's access in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], no. 51357/07, §§ 112-14, 15 March 2018, and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 229-30, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08
BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 22289/08
Furthermore, it is not for this Court to deal with alleged errors of law or fact committed by the national courts unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015). - EGMR, 16.11.2000 - 39442/98
SOTIRIS ET NIKOS KOUTRAS ATTEE c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 22289/08
Taking those factors into consideration, the Court concludes that by refusing to examine the cassation appeal, the Higher Administrative Court penalised the applicants for an error that was attributable not to them but to the judicial authorities, thus depriving the applicants of their right of access to a court (see, for comparison, Gavrilov v. Ukraine, no. 11691/06, § 25, 16 February 2017; Simecki, cited above, § 46; and Sotiris and Nikos Koutras ATTEE v. Greece, no. 39442/98, § 21, ECHR 2000-XII). - EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 11691/06
GAVRILOV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 22289/08
Taking those factors into consideration, the Court concludes that by refusing to examine the cassation appeal, the Higher Administrative Court penalised the applicants for an error that was attributable not to them but to the judicial authorities, thus depriving the applicants of their right of access to a court (see, for comparison, Gavrilov v. Ukraine, no. 11691/06, § 25, 16 February 2017; Simecki, cited above, § 46; and Sotiris and Nikos Koutras ATTEE v. Greece, no. 39442/98, § 21, ECHR 2000-XII).