Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHIRYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities and an excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court found similar violations in many cases against Russia (see, in general, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012; and also, as regards the conditions of detention obtaining in the IZ-71/1 remand prison at the material time, Kozhokar v. Russia, no. 33099/08, §§ 95-98, 16 December 2010, and Shcherbakov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 34959/07, §§ 67-74, 24 October 2013).

  In cases featuring a continuing situation, the six-month period runs from the cessation of that situation (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 71-72, 10 January 2012).

• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  The issue of an excessive length of appeal proceedings in detention matters has also been addressed by the Court on many occasions (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 157, 22 May 2012, and Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006).
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

  DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities and an excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court found similar violations in many cases against Russia (see, in general, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012; and also, as regards the conditions of detention obtaining in the IZ-71/1 remand prison at the material time, Kozhokar v. Russia, no. 33099/08, §§ 95-98, 16 December 2010, and Shcherbakov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 34959/07, §§ 67-74, 24 October 2013).

 
• EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  The issue of an excessive length of appeal proceedings in detention matters has also been addressed by the Court on many occasions (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 157, 22 May 2012, and Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006).
• EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

  SULWINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declarations in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03).
• EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 34959/07

  SHCHERBAKOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities and an excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court found similar violations in many cases against Russia (see, in general, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012; and also, as regards the conditions of detention obtaining in the IZ-71/1 remand prison at the material time, Kozhokar v. Russia, no. 33099/08, §§ 95-98, 16 December 2010, and Shcherbakov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 34959/07, §§ 67-74, 24 October 2013).
• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 33099/08

  KOZHOKAR v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities and an excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court found similar violations in many cases against Russia (see, in general, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012; and also, as regards the conditions of detention obtaining in the IZ-71/1 remand prison at the material time, Kozhokar v. Russia, no. 33099/08, §§ 95-98, 16 December 2010, and Shcherbakov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 34959/07, §§ 67-74, 24 October 2013).